Dual-purpose canola—a new opportunity in mixed farming systems
J. A. Kirkegaard A D , S. J. Sprague A , H. Dove A , W. M. Kelman A , S. J. Marcroft B , A. Lieschke C , G. N. Howe A and J. M. Graham AA CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B Marcroft Grains Pathology, 110 Natimuk Rd, Horsham, Vic. 3400, Australia.
C School of Agriculture, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: john.kirkegaard@csiro.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(4) 291-302 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07285
Submitted: 31 July 2007 Accepted: 18 January 2008 Published: 8 April 2008
Abstract
The term dual-purpose canola describes the use of a canola crop for forage before seed production. It could potentially provide a profitable and flexible break-crop option for mixed farms, but there have been no studies to test the concept in Australia. We investigated the feasibility of using canola in this way in field experiments near Canberra, Australia, from 2004 to 2006, using European winter and mid–late maturing Australian spring canola varieties. Winter varieties sown from early March to mid-April produced 2.5–5.0 t/ha of biomass providing 0.3–3.5 t/ha of high-quality forage grazed by sheep in winter. The spring varieties produced similar amounts of vegetative biomass from April sowing but were unsuited to the earlier March sowing as they flowered in early winter and did not recover from grazing. The canola forage was readily eaten by sheep; alkane-based estimates of diet composition indicated that >85% of the organic matter intake consisted of canola. Canola forage was also highly digestible (86–88%) and Merino hoggets grew at 210 g/day from a dry matter intake of 1530 g DM/day. The canola generally recovered well when grazed in winter before bud elongation. Delays in flowering associated with heavy grazing ranged from 0 to 4 days when grazed before buds were visible, to 28 days if the crop had commenced flowering. Significant delays in flowering (>14 days) associated with winter grazing did not reduce seed yield or oil content when favourable spring conditions allowed compensatory growth. Yield loss was observed when winter and spring conditions were unfavourable for compensatory growth, or if grazing continued too late into spring (late September) irrespective of seasonal conditions. The yield loss was more than offset by the value of the grazed forage and the mean gross margin for dual-purpose canola over the four experiments was $240 to $500 higher than for grain-only canola depending on the value assumed for the forage. The study indicates there is considerable scope to capture value from grazing early-sown canola crops during winter without significant, uneconomic trade-offs with seed yield. Further investigations in other medium to high rainfall environments in southern Australia are warranted.
Additional keywords: feed gap, Brassica, mixed farming, forage rape, diet selection, intake.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the staff at CSIRO Ginninderra Experiment Station for assistance in managing the crops and livestock in these experiments, and Mr Mark Smith for technical assistance.
Bruce SE,
Kirkegaard JA,
Pratley JE, Howe GN
(2005) Impacts of retained wheat residue on canola in southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 421–433.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bruce SE,
Ryan MH,
Kirkegaard JA, Pratley J
(2006) Improving the performance of canola in retained wheat stubble. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1203–1212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dann PR,
Axelsen A,
Dear BS,
Williams ER, Edwards CBH
(1983) Herbage, grain and animal production from winter-grazed cereal crops. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 23, 154–161.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dann PR,
Axelsen A, Edwards CBH
(1977) The grain yield of winter-grazed crops. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 17, 452–461.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dove H, Mayes RW
(2006) Protocol for the analysis of n-alkanes and other plant-wax compounds and for their use as markers for quantifying the nutrient supply of large mammalian herbivores. Nature Protocols 1, 1680–1697.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Dove H,
Mayes RW,
Lamb CS, Ellis KJ
(2002) Factors influencing the release rate of alkanes from an intra-ruminal, controlled-release device, and the resultant accuracy of intake estimation in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 681–696.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dove H, Milne JA
(2006) The intake and productivity of lambs grazing leafy or stemmy forage rape and the effect of energy or protein supplements. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 763–769.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dove H, Moore AD
(1995) Using a least-squares optimisation procedure to estimate botanical composition based on the alkanes of plant cuticular wax. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1535–1544.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fitt BDL,
Brun H,
Barbetti MJ, Rimmer SR
(2006) World-wide importance of phoma stem canker (Leptosphaeria maculans and L. biglobosa) on oilseed rape (Brassica napus). European Journal of Plant Pathology 114, 3–15.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harper FR, Berkenkamp B
(1975) Revised growth stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 55, 657–658.
Hocking PJ,
Kirkegaard JA,
Angus JF,
Gibson AH, Koetz EA
(1997a) Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments. I. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality. Field Crops Research 49, 107–125.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hocking PJ,
Randall PJ, DeMarco D
(1997b) The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertiliser: partitioning and mobilisation of dry matter and nitrogen and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Research 54, 201–220.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelman WM, Dove H
(2007) Effects of a spring-sown Brassica crop on lamb performance and on subsequent establishment and grain yield of dual-purpose winter wheat and oat crops. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 815–824.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA,
Sprague SJ,
Robertson M, Hamblin P
(2006) Impacts of blackleg and sclerotinia stem rot on canola yield in a high rainfall zone, southern New South Wales, Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 201–212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lewis RM,
Magadlela AM,
Jessop NS, Emmans GC
(2003) The ability of the n-alkane technique to estimate intake and diet choice of sheep. Animal Science 77, 319–327.
Marcroft SJ,
Purwantara A,
Salisbury PA,
Potter TD,
Wratten N,
Khangura R,
Barbetti MJ, Howlett BJ
(2002) Reaction of a range of Brassica species under Australian conditions to the fungus, Leptosphaeria maculans, the causal agent of blackleg. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 587–594.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mayes RW,
Lamb CS, Colgrove PM
(1986) The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 161–170.
Robertson MJ,
Watkinson AR,
Kirkegaard JA,
Holland JF, Potter TD ,
et al.
.
(2002) Environmental and genotypic control of time to flowering in canola and Indian mustard. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 793–809.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Virgona JM,
Gummer FAJ, Angus JF
(2006) Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use and nitrogen use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1307–1319.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |