Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. III. Broad-sense heritability of epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, and relative water content
A. T. James A , R. J. Lawn B D and M. Cooper CA Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072; now CSIRO Plant Industry, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.
B Tropical Crop Science Unit, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Davies Laboratory, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia.
C Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072; now Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., PO Box 1004, Johnston, IA 50131, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email Robert.Lawn@jcu.edu.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(7) 679-689 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07161
Submitted: 19 April 2007 Accepted: 18 March 2008 Published: 3 July 2008
Abstract
The broad-sense heritability of 3 traits related to leaf survival in severely stressed plants was studied in several hybrid soybean populations. The 3 traits were epidermal conductance (ge), osmotic potential (π), and relative water content (RWC). The populations were generated by hybridising unrelated parental genotypes previously shown to differ in the 3 traits. ge (mm/s) was measured on well watered plants from 10 populations involving all combinations of 5 parental lines, grown in soil-filled beds in the glasshouse. π (MPa) and RWC (%) were measured on severely stressed plants of 3 populations involving all combinations of 3 different parents, growing into a terminal water deficit under a rainout shelter in the field. Broad-sense heritability for ge was significantly different from zero (P < 0.05) in all 10 populations and ranged from 60% to 93%. Heritability estimates for π70 (the tissue osmotic potential at 70% RWC) ranged from 33% to 71%. Only two estimates were statistically significant (P < 0.05) because of large standard errors and the fact that parental differences were smaller than previously observed. Broad-sense heritability for RWC of severely stressed plants ranged from 40% to 74%, and was statistically significant (P < 0.05) for 2 of the 3 populations. For all 3 traits, F2 progeny distributions were consistent with quantitative inheritance with a high degree of additive gene action. It was concluded that capacity exists to breed varieties with low ge, low π70, and high RWC in stressed plants. However, in the case of osmotic potential, genotypes with lower π70 combined with greater precision of measurement would be needed than proved possible in these studies. Further, specific strategies would be needed to select for the critical RWC, the minimal RWC at which leaf tissues die and which provides a measure of tissue dehydration tolerance. More research is also needed to characterise the dynamic relations between ge, π, and RWC in influencing leaf survival in soybean, before they could be confidently used in a breeding program to improve drought tolerance.
Additional keywords: breeding, drought resistance, leaf survival, turgor maintenance, physiology.
Acknowledgments
The research reported here was supported by CSIRO, the Grains Research and Development Corporation, and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research and was undertaken in partial fulfillment of the PhD degree awarded to ATJ by the University of Queensland in 2004.
Barrs HD, Weatherley PE
(1962) A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Science 15, 413–428.
Blum A
(2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1159–1168.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hiromoto DM, Vello NA
(1986) The genetic base of Brazilian soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) cultivars. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 2, 295–306.
James AT,
Lawn RJ, Cooper M
(2008a) Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. I. Variation in soybean and wild Glycine spp. for epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, and relative water content. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 656–669.
James AT,
Lawn RJ, Cooper M
(2008b) Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. II. Inter-relations between epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, relative water content, and plant survival. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 670–678.
Lawn RJ
(1982) Response of four grain legumes to water stress in south-eastern Queensland. I. Physiological response mechanisms. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 481–496.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lawn RJ, Imrie BC
(1991) Crop improvement for tropical Australia: designing plants for difficult climates. Field Crops Research 26, 113–139.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Likoswe AA, Lawn RJ
(2008) Response to terminal water deficit stress of cowpea, pigeonpea, and soybean in pure stand and in competition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 27–37.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ludlow MM, Muchow RC
(1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 43, 107–153.
| Crossref |
Morgan JM
(1977) Differences in osmoregulation between wheat genotypes. Nature 270, 234–235.
| Crossref |
Morgan JM
(1992) Adaptation to water deficits in three grain legume species. Mechanisms of turgor maintenance. Field Crops Research 29, 91–106.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Morgan JM
(2000) Increases in grain yield of wheat by breeding for an osmoregulation gene: relationship to water supply and evaporative demand. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 971–978.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Muchow RC
(1985) Stomatal behaviour in grain legumes grown under different soil water regimes in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Research 11, 291–307.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nguyen HT,
Chandra Babu R, Blum A
(1997) Breeding for drought resistance in rice: physiology and molecular genetics considerations. Crop Science 37, 1426–1434.
Osborne R, Patterson WSB
(1952) On the sampling variance of heritability estimates derived from variance analyses. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section B: Biology 694, 456–461.
Pajé M,
Ludlow MM, Lawn RJ
(1988) Variation among soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) accessions in epidermal conductance of leaves. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 363–373.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rose IA,
McWhirter KS, Spurway RA
(1992) Identification of drought-tolerance in early-maturing indeterminate soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 645–657.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shorter R,
Lawn RJ, Hammer GL
(1991) Improving genotypic adaptation in crops—a role for breeders, physiologists and modellers. Experimental Agriculture 27, 155–175.
Sinclair TR, Ludlow MM
(1986) Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13, 329–341.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Subbarao GV,
Johansen C,
Slinkard AE,
Nageswara Rao RC,
Saxena NP, Chauhan YS
(1995) Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 14, 469–523.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Summerfield RJ, Lawn RJ
(1987) Tropical grain legume crops: a commentary. Outlook on Agriculture 16, 189–198.
Warner JW
(1952) A method for estimating heritability. Agronomy Journal 44, 427–430.