Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 4. Genetic parameters for first-cross animal performance

V. M. Ingham A , N. M. Fogarty B F , A. R. Gilmour B , R. A. Afolayan B , L. J. Cummins C , G. M. Gaunt D , J. Stafford E and J. E. Hocking Edwards E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Agrisearch Services Pty Ltd, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

B The Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

C Department of Primary Industries, Primary Industries Research, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.

D Department of Primary Industries, Primary Industries Research, Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia.

E South Australian Research & Development Institute, Struan Research Centre, Naracoorte, SA 5271, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: neal.fogarty@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58(8) 839-846 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06368
Submitted: 22 November 2006  Accepted: 3 May 2007   Published: 30 August 2007

Abstract

The study estimated heritability for lamb growth and carcass performance, hogget ewe wool production, and worm egg count among crossbred progeny of maternal breed sires, as well as the genetic and phenotypic correlations among the traits. The data were from crossbred progeny of 91 sires from maternal breeds including Border Leicester, East Friesian, Finnsheep, Coopworth, White Suffolk, Corriedale, and Booroola Leicester. The sires were mated to Merino ewes at 3 sites over 3 years (and also Corriedale ewes at one site), with 3 common sires used at each site and year to provide genetic links. These sheep comprised part of the national maternal sire central progeny test program (MCPT) to evaluate the genetic variation for economically important production traits in progeny of maternal and dual-purpose (meat and wool) sires and the scope for genetic improvement. The matings resulted in 7846 first-cross lambs born, with 2964 wether lambs slaughtered at an average age of 214 days, and wool data from 2795 hogget ewes. Data were analysed using univariate mixed models containing fixed effects for site, year, sex and type of birth and rearing, dam source and sire breed, and random terms for sire and dam effects. Heritabilities and genetic correlations were estimated based on variances from progeny of 70 sires by fitting the same mixed models using a REML procedure in univariate and multivariate analyses. Estimates of heritability were low for lamb growth traits (0.07–0.29), meat colour and meat pH (0.10–0.23), and faecal worm egg count (0.10), moderate for carcass fat and muscle traits (0.32–0.47), and moderate to high for wool traits (0.36–0.55). Estimates of direct genetic correlations among liveweights at various ages were high and positive (0.41–0.77) and those between liveweights and most carcass and meat quality traits were small and varied in sign. Liveweights were moderately to highly positively correlated with most wool traits, except fibre diameter (–0.28–0.08). The study indicates that there is genetic variation for wool, growth, carcass, and meat quality traits, as well as for faecal worm egg count, with scope for selection within Australian maternal sire breeds of sheep.

Additional keywords: heritability, genetic correlations, maternal breeds, meat colour, meat pH.


Acknowledgments

The MCPT was run by the NSW Department of Primary Industries, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, and the South Australian Research and Development Institute, with the generous financial support of Meat and Livestock Australia. Commonwealth funding through the Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre is also gratefully acknowledged. We also gratefully acknowledge the many other scientists, technical, and other support staff at the Agricultural and Advisory Station, Cowra, Orange Agricultural Institute, the Pastoral and Veterinary Institute, Hamilton, Rutherglen Research Institute, and Struan Research Centre, who have contributed to and supported the work over several years. We especially acknowledge the contributions of Jayce Morgan, Lynette McLeod, Kelly Lees, Tony Markham, Murray Arnold, Kerrie Groves, Trevor Pollard, Greg Seymour, Taffy Phillips, Paul Curran, Jack Rowe, Tamara Starbuck, Liz Abraham, and Elke Hocking. The support of ram breeders who entered sires is also greatly appreciated.


References


Al-Shorepy SA, Notter DR (1996) Genetic variation and covariation for ewe reproduction, lamb growth, and lamb scrotal circumference in a Fall-lambing sheep flock. Journal of Animal Science 74, 1490–1498.
PubMed |
open url image1

Banks RG (2002) An integrated system of genetic evaluation and improvement tools for Australian sheep breeders. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 50, 359–365. open url image1

Brash LD, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR (1994) Genetic parameters for Australian maternal and dual-purpose meatsheep breeds. II. Liveweight, wool and reproduction in Corriedale sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 469–480.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bromley CM, Snowder GD, Van Vleck LD (2000) Genetic parameters among growth, prolificacy, and wool traits of Columbia, Polypay, Rambouillet, and Targhee sheep. Journal of Animal Science 78, 846–858.
PubMed |
open url image1

Brown DJ , Ball A , Huisman AE , Swan AA , Atkins KD , Graser HU , Banks R , Swan P , Woolaston R (2006) Sheep Genetics Australia: a national genetic evaluation system for Australian sheep. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production’. Belo Horizonte, Brazil, (CD-ROM Communication 05–03)

Fogarty NM (1995) Genetic parameters for live weight, fat and muscle measurements, wool production and reproduction in sheep: a review. Animal Breeding Abstract 63, 101–143. open url image1

Fogarty NM, Ingham VM, Gilmour AR, Cummins LJ, Gaunt GM, Stafford J, Hocking Edwards JE, Banks RG (2005a) Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 1. Breed and fixed effects for birth and weaning weight of first-cross lambs, gestation length, and reproduction of base ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 443–453.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fogarty NM, Ingham VM, Gilmour AR, Cummins LJ, Gaunt GM, Stafford J, Hocking Edwards JE, Banks RG (2005b) Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 2. Breed and fixed effects for post-weaning growth, carcass, and wool of first-cross lambs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 455–463.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fogarty NM, Safari E, Gilmour AR, Ingham VI, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Swan AA, Brien F, Greeff JC, van der Werf JHJ (2006) Wool and meat genetics—the joint possibilities. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 54, 22–27. open url image1

Fogarty NM, Safari E, Taylor PJ, Murray W (2003) Genetic parameters for meat quality and carcass traits and their correlation with wool traits in Australian Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 715–722.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gilmour AR , Gogel BJ , Cullis BR , Welham SJ , Thompson R (2002) ‘ASReml user guide release 1.0.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Greeff J, Davidson R, Skerritt J (2003) Genetic relationships between carcass quality and wool production traits in Australian Merino rams. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 330–333. open url image1

Greeff JC, Cox G, Butler L, Dowling M (2005) Genetic relationships between carcass quality and wool production traits in Australian Merino rams. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 16, 12–15. open url image1

Kenney PA, Goddard ME, Thatcher LP (1995) Genetic parameters for terminal sires estimated using data of progeny from Border Leicester × Merino ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 703–719.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lewer RP, Woolaston RR, Howe RR (1994) Studies on Western Australian sheep. 2. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for objectively measured traits on ram and ewe hoggets using different model types. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 829–840.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pollott GE, Guy DR, Croston D (1994) Genetic parameters of lamb carcass characteristics at three end-points: fat level, age and weight. Animal Production 58, 65–75. open url image1

Safari E , Fogarty NM (2003) Genetic parameters for sheep production traits: estimates from the literature. Technical Bulletin vol. 49, NSW Agriculture, Orange, Australia. www.sheep.crc.org.au/articles.php3?rc=145.

Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR (2005) A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science 92, 271–289.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR (2006) Sensitivity of multi-trait index selection to changes in genetic correlations between production traits in sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 283–290.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Snyman MA, Erasmus GJ, van Wyk JB, Olivier JJ (1998) Genetic and phenotypic correlations among production and reproduction traits in Afrino sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science 28, 74–81. open url image1

Waldron DF, Clarke JN, Rae AL, Kirton AH, Bennett GL (1992) Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for selection to improve lamb carcass traits. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Science 35, 287–298. open url image1

van Wijk HJ, Arts DJG, Matthews JO, Webster M, Ducro BJ, Knol EF (2005) Genetic parameter estimates for carcass composition and pork quality estimated in a commercial production chain. Journal of Animal Science 83, 324–333.
PubMed |
open url image1