The response of sows to increased nutrient intake during mid to late gestation
R. H. King A C , P. J. Eason A , R. J. Smits B , W. C. Morley B and D. J. Henman BA Primary Industries Research Victoria, 600 Sneydes Road, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia.
B QAF Meats Pty Ltd, Redlands Road, Corowa, NSW 2646, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: Ray.King@dpi.vic.gov.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(1) 33-39 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05195
Submitted: 24 May 2005 Accepted: 21 September 2005 Published: 30 January 2006
Abstract
Five hundred and ten multiparous sows were allocated at 66 days after mating to one of 6 dietary treatments that were imposed for the subsequent 35 days. The dietary treatments were 5 feeding levels of 2.2, 2.6, 3.0, 3.4, and 3.8 kg/day of a gestation diet containing 12.9 MJ DE/kg, 127 g crude protein/kg, and 5.6 g lysine/kg, plus a protein intake treatment where sows received 2.8 kg/day of a lactation diet containing 13.8 MJ DE/kg, 168 g crude protein/kg, and 8.3 g lysine/kg. After the treatment period, all sows were offered the lactation diet at the common feeding level of 3.0 kg/day and after farrowing, all sows were offered this diet ad libitum throughout lactation. Increasing feeding levels between Day 66 and Day 101 of pregnancy increased (P < 0.001) liveweight gain prior to farrowing but increased (P < 0.001) liveweight loss during lactation. The majority of the extra maternal energy intake during mid to late gestation was deposited as maternal gain. These linear weight responses during lactation were explained by the significant inverse relationship between voluntary daily feed intake in lactation (FI) and average daily digestible energy intake in the previous gestation (DE):
Neither increasing the feeding level during mid to late gestation nor increasing the protein content of the diet had any significant effect on litter birth weight, average piglet birth weight, or the standard deviation of individual piglet birth weight within the litter. In addition, there were no significant effects of gestation feeding treatments on litter size weaned or weaning weight. Furthermore, neither increasing the feeding level during mid to late gestation nor increasing the protein content of the gestation diet had any significant effect on subsequent fertility or litter size. In conclusion, when average individual piglet birth weight is already well in excess of 1.5 kg, there is no significant response to feed intake levels between 2.2 and 3.8 kg/day when offered between Day 66 and Day 101 of gestation.
Additional keyword: birth weight.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr Peter Rich for his assistance in collection and collation of experimental data. The financial support of Australian Pork Limited is also acknowledged.
Close, WH ,
and
Cole, DJA (2000).
Close WH,
Noblet J, Heavens RP
(1985) Studies on energy metabolism of the pregnant sow. 2. The partition and utilisation of metabolizable energy intake in pregnant and non-pregnant animals. The British Journal of Nutrition 53, 267–279.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Cole M, Varley M
(2000) Weight watchers from birth. Pig International 30, 13–16.
Dourmad JY
(1991) Effect of feeding level in the gilt during pregnancy on voluntary feed intake during lactation and changes in body composition during gestation and lactation. Livestock Production Science 27, 309–319.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Elliot JI, Lodge GA
(1978) Severe feed restriction of the sow during late pregnancy. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 58, 43–48.
Hillyer GN, Phillips P
(1980) The effect of increasing feed level to sows and gilts in late pregnancy on subsequent litter size, litter weight and maternal bodyweight change. Animal Production [Abstr.] 30, 469.
Hughes PE, Smits RJ
(2003) The relationships between sow body condition, reproductive performance and culling. ‘Manipulating pig production IX’. (Ed. J Paterson)
p. 58. (Australasian Pig Science Association: Werribee, Vic.)
Lee PA, Mitchell KG
(1989) Feeding sows for specific weight gains in pregnancy and its effects on reproductive performance. Animal Production 48, 407–417.
Lodge GA
(1972) Quantitative aspects of nutrition in pregnancy. ‘Pig production’. (Ed. DJA Cole)
pp. 99–116. (Butterworths: London)
National Research Council (1998).
Noblet J,
Close WH,
Heavens RP, Brown D
(1985) Studies on the energy metabolism of the pregnant sow. 1. Uterus and mammary tissue development. The British Journal of Nutrition 53, 251–265.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Noblet J, Etienne M
(1985) Energy metabolism in the pregnant sow. Abstr. 74. ‘Proceedings, 10th International Symposium on Energy Metabolism’. 15–21 Sept 1985, Airlie, VA.. (United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)
Petchy AM, Jolly GM
(1979) Sow service in lactation: an analysis of data from one herd. Animal Production 29, 183–191.
Pluske JR, Williams IH, Aherne FX
(1995) Nutrition of the neonatal pig. ‘The neonatal pig: development and survival’. (Ed. MA Varley)
pp. 187–235. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Pond WE,
Yen JT,
Maurer RR, Christenson RK
(1981) Effect of doubling daily energy intake during the last two weeks of pregnancy on pig birth weight survival and weaning weight. Journal of Animal Science 52, 535–541.
| PubMed |
Shearer IJ, Adam JL
(1973) Nutritional and physiological development in reproduction in pigs. Proceedings New Zealand Society of Animal Production 33, 62–86.
Smits RJ, Campbell RG, King RH
(1997) The effect of increased feed intake during gestation on fertility, litter size and lactation performance of primiparous sows. ‘Manipulating pig production VI’. (Ed. PD Cranwell)
p. 57. (Australasian Pig Science Association: Werribee, Vic.)
Snedecor, GW ,
and
Cochran, WG (1967).
Walker N
(1983) The effects of food intake in gestation on sows lactating for 14 days. Animal Production 37, 25–31.
Whittemore, CT (1993).
Williams, IH ,
Close, WH ,
and
Cole, DJA (1985).
