Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Source–sink effects on grain weight of bread wheat, durum wheat, and triticale at different locations

Daniel F. Calderini A D , M. P. Reynolds B and G. A. Slafer C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Campus Isla Teja, Valdivia, Chile.

B CIMMYT (International Centre for Maize and Wheat Improvement), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Colonia Juárez, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico.

C Research Professor of ICREA at the Department of Crop Production and Forestry, University of Lleida, Centre UdL-IRTA, Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.

D Corresponding author. Email: danielcalderini@uach.cl

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(2) 227-233 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05107
Submitted: 17 March 2005  Accepted: 2 November 2005   Published: 24 February 2006

Abstract

Source limitation during grain filling is important for both management and breeding strategies of grain crops. There is little information on the sensitivity of grain weight of temperate cereals to variations in source–sink ratios, and no studies are available on the comparative behaviour of temperate cereals growing together in the same experiment. The objective of the current study was to evaluate, under field conditions, the response of grain weight to different source–sink ratios during grain filling in high-yielding cultivars of bread wheat, durum wheat, and triticale at 2 contrasting locations. Two experiments were carried out at C. Obregon and El Batan in Mexico. In each location, 6 genotypes (2 bread wheat, 2 durum wheat, 2 triticale) were evaluated. A week after anthesis, 2 source–sink (control and halved spikes) treatments were imposed. Location and genotype significantly (P < 0.01) affected grain yield and components. Significant grain weight increases (P < 0.05) were found only in 2 cases in El Batan. The highest response of 17% was found in triticale, with less than 10% in most of the other genotypes. The effect of genotype and location is discussed.

Additional keywords: source–sink ratio, kernel weight, grain weight components.


Acknowledgments

We especially thank the staff of CIMMYT’s Wheat Physiology Laboratory, Tirso. Rojo, Eugenio Perez, and Guadalupe Perez, for their important technical assistance. This work was supported by an overseas scholarship from the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina (Programa Thalmann).


References


Borghi B, Corbellini M, Cattaneo M, Fornasari MA, Zucchelli L (1986) Modification of the sink/source relationship in bread wheat and its influence on grain yield and protein content. Journal Agronomy and Crop Science 157, 245–254. open url image1

Borrás L, Slafer GA, Otegui MO (2004) Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research 86, 131–146.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Brocklehurst PA (1977) Factors controlling grain weight in wheat. Nature 266, 348–349.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Calderini DF, Abeledo LG, Savin R, Slafer GA (1999a) Carpel size and temperature in pre-anthesis modify potential grain weight in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 132, 453–460.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Calderini DF, Abeledo LG, Savin R, Slafer GA (1999b) Final grain weight in wheat as affected by short periods of high temperature during pre- and post-anthesis under field conditions. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23, 453–458. open url image1

Calderini DF, Miralles DJ, Sadras VO (1996) Appearance and growth of individual leaves as affected by semidwarfism in isogenic lines of wheat. Annals of Botany 77, 583–589.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cruz-Aguado JA, Reyes F, Rodes R, Perez I, Dorado M (1999) Effect of source-sink ratio on partitioning of dry matter and 14C-photoassimilates in wheat during grain filling. Annals of Botany 83, 655–665.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dreccer MF, Grashoff C, Rabbinge R (1997) Source–sink ratio in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) during grain filling: effects on senescence and grain protein concentration. Field Crops Research 49, 269–277.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fischer RA (1985) Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 447–461. open url image1

Fischer RA, HilleRisLambers D (1978) Effect of environment and cultivar on source limitation to grain weight in spring wheats. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 443–458.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hay RKM, Kirby EJM (1991) Convergence and synchrony—a review of the coordination of development in wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 661–700.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jandel (1991). ‘Table Curve V. 3.0. User’s manual version 3.0 AISN software.’ (Jandel Scientific: Corte Madera, CA)

Koshkin EI, Tararina VV (1989) Yield and source/sink relations of spring wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research 22, 297–306.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kruk BC, Calderini DF, Slafer GA (1997) Grain weight in wheat cultivars released from 1920 to 1990 as affected by post-anthesis defoliation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 128, 273–281.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Loss SP, Kirby EJM, Siddique KHM, Perry MW (1989) Grain growth and development of old and modern Australian wheats. Field Crops Research 21, 131–146.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lupton FGH, Ali MAM (1966) Studies on photosynthesis in the ear of wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 57, 281–286. open url image1

Ma YZ, MacKnown CT, VanSandford DA (1990) Sink manipulation in wheat: compensatory changes in kernel size. Crop Science 30, 1099–1105. open url image1

Miralles DJ, Dominguez CF, Slafer GA (1996) Grain growth and postanthesis leaf area duration in dwarf, semidwarf and tall isogenic lines of wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 177, 115–122. open url image1

Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (1995) Individual grain weight responses to genetic reduction in culm length in wheat as affected by source-sink manipulations. Field Crops Research 43, 55–66.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nicolas ME, Gleadow RM, Dalling MJ (1984) Effects of drought and high temperature on grain growth in wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11, 553–566. open url image1

Pérez P, Martínez-Carrasco R (1985) Regulación de la acumulación de nitrógeno en el grano de trigo por el suministro de la demanda de fotosintatos. Anales de Edafología y Agrobiología 43, 479–489. open url image1

Prescott JA (1940) Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 64, 114–125. open url image1

Randall PJ, Moss HJ (1990) Some effects of temperature regime during grain filling on wheat quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 603–617.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Reynolds MP, Pellegrineschi A, Skovmand B (2005) Sink-limitation to yield and biomass: a summary of some investigations in spring wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 146, 39–49. open url image1

Reynolds MP, Trethowan R, Crossa J, Vargas M, Sayre KD (2002) Physiological factors associated with genotype by environment interaction in wheat. Field Crops Research 75, 139–160.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Richards RA (1996) Increasing the yield potential in wheat: manipulating sources and sinks. ‘Increasing yield potential in wheat: breaking the barriers’. (Eds MP Reynolds, S Rajaram, A McNab) pp. 134–149. (CIMMYT Int. Symp., CIANO, Cd: Obregon, Mexico)

Savin R, Molina-Cano JL (2002) Changes in malting quality and its determinants in response to abiotic stresses. ‘Barley. Recent advances from molecular biology to agronomy of yield and quality’. (Eds GA Slafer, JL Molina-Cano, JL Arauz, R Savin, I Romagosa) pp. 523–550. (Food Product Press, The Haworth Press: New York)

Savin R, Slafer GA (1991) Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinian wheat cultivar. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116, 1–7. open url image1

Simmons ST, Crooston RK, Kurle JE (1982) Growth of spring wheat kernels as influenced by reduced kernel number per spike and defoliation. Crop Science 22, 983–988. open url image1

Slafer GA, Connor DJ, Halloran GM (1994) Rate of leaf appearance and final number of leaves in wheat: effects of duration and rate of change of photoperiod. Annals of Botany 74, 427–436.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Slafer GA, Savin R (1994) Grain mass change in a semi-dwarf and a standard-height wheat cultivar under different sink-source relationships. Field Crops Research 37, 39–49.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sofield I, Evans LT, Cook MG, Wardlaw I (1977) Factors influencing the rate and duration of grain filling in wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 4, 785–797. open url image1

Voltas J, Romagosa I, Araus JL (1998) Growth and final weight of central and lateral barley grains under Mediterranean conditions as influenced by sink strength. Crop Science 38, 84–89. open url image1

Wardlaw IF (1994) The effect of high temperature on kernel development in wheat: variability related to pre-heading and post-anthesis conditions. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 21, 731–739. open url image1

Wardlaw IF, Moncur L (1995) The response of wheat to high temperature following anthesis. I. The rate and duration of kernel filling. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22, 391–397. open url image1

Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421. open url image1