Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > AR05082
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 57(9)

Genetics of flight time and other measures of temperament and their value as selection criteria for improving meat quality traits in tropically adapted breeds of beef cattle

Meridy J. Kadel A , David J. Johnston A D , Heather M. Burrow B , Hans-U. Graser A and Drewe M. Ferguson C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Cooperative Research Centre for Cattle and Beef Quality.

A Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit*, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

B CSIRO Livestock Industries, Box 5545, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Qld 4702, Australia.

C CSIRO Livestock Industries, Locked Bag 1, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email djohnsto@pobox.une.edu.au

*AGBU is a joint venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries and The University of New England.

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(9) 1029-1035 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05082
Submitted: 3 March 2005  Accepted: 24 April 2006   Published: 30 August 2006

Abstract

Flight time, an objective measure of temperament, was recorded in 3594 Brahman, Belmont Red, and Santa Gertrudis heifers and steers. Two subjective measures of temperament (crush score and flight speed score) were also available for over 2000 of these animals. Temperament measures were recorded post-weaning (average age 8 months) and again at the start of finishing (average age 19 months) on a subset of the animals. Nine meat quality traits were measured on these animals and included measures on 2 different muscles [M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) and M. semitendinosus (ST)]. The heritability of flight time measured post-weaning and at the start of finishing was 0.30 and 0.34, respectively, with a repeatability of 0.46 across the measurement times. Heritabilities for scored temperament traits were 0.21, 0.19, and 0.15 for post-weaning flight speed score, post-weaning crush score, and start of finishing crush score, respectively. Genetic correlations across measurement times for flight time were 0.98 and 0.96 for crush score, indicating a strong underlying genetic basis of these temperament measures over time; however, the corresponding phenotypic correlations were lower (0.48 and 0.37, respectively). Longer flight times (i.e. better temperament) were genetically correlated with improved tenderness (i.e. lower shear force and higher tenderness scores), with genetic correlations of –0.42 and 0.33 between LTL shear force, and Meat Standards Australia (MSA) tenderness, respectively. Genetic correlations between post-weaning crush score and the same meat quality traits were 0.39 and –0.47, respectively. However, genetic and phenotypic correlations between measures of temperament and other meat quality traits were generally low, with the exception of crush scores with LTL Minolta a* value (–0.37 and –0.63 for post-weaning and start of finishing measurement time, respectively). Predicted correlated responses of –0.17 kg LTL shear force and 2.6 MSA tenderness points per generation were predicted based on the genetic parameter estimates and a recording regime of both flight time and crush scores. Selection based on the measures of temperament described in this study could be used to improve temperament itself and correlated improvements can also occur in meat tenderness and eating quality traits in tropically adapted breeds of cattle.

Additional keywords: flight speed, tenderness, heritability, genetic correlation.


Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the core partners of the Cooperative Research Centre for Cattle and Beef Quality (The University of New England, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, CSIRO, and Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries), the Commonwealth funding through the CRC’s Program, and the generous financial support of Meat and Livestock Australia. We also gratefully thank all Beef CRC participants, both scientists and technical staff, who contributed to or supported the work, including those involved in cattle management, data collection, laboratory analyses, and data handling. We especially thank our cooperator breeders and acknowledge the contributions of Phil Fraser, Warren Simm, Nick Corbet, Reid Geddes, Stewart Murphy, Janet Stark, David Edmonds, Chris Jones, Elmarie Bradfield, Elke Stephens, Andrew Blakely, Matt Kelly, Don Menzies, and Paul Reynolds and the database managers Mrs Elaine Farrell and Mrs Joanne Dullaway.


References


Burrow HM (1997) Measurements of temperament and their relationships with performance traits of beef cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 65, 477–495. open url image1

Burrow HM, Corbet NJ (2000) Genetic and environmental factors affecting temperament of zebu and zebu-derived beef cattle grazed at pasture in the tropics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 155–162.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Burrow HM, Dillon RD (1997) Relationships between temperament and growth in a feedlot and commercial carcass traits of Bos indicus crossbreds. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37, 407–411.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Burrow HM, Seifert GW, Corbet NJ (1988) A new technique for measuring temperament in cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 17, 154–157. open url image1

Burrow HM, Shorthose WR, Stark JL (1999) Relationships between temperament and carcass and meat quality attributes of tropical beef cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 13, 227–230. open url image1

Ferguson DM, Bruce HL, Thompson JM, Egan AF, Perry D, Shorthose WR (2001) Factors affecting beef palatability — farmgate to chilled carcass. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 879–892.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fordyce G, Goddard ME, Tyler R, Williams G, Toleman MA (1985) Temperament and bruising of Bos indicus cross cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 25, 283–288.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gilmour AR , Cullis BR , Welham SJ , Thompson R (2000) ‘ASREML reference manual.’ (NSW Agriculture: Orange, NSW)

Groeneveld E , García-Cortés LA (1998) VCE 4.0, a (co)variance components package for frequentists and bayesians. In ‘Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production’. Armidale, NSW. Vol. 27, pp. 455–458.

Halloway DR, Johnston DJ (2003) Evaluation of flight time and crush score as measures of temperament in Angus cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 261–264. open url image1

Hassal AC (1974) Behaviour patterns of beef cattle in relation to production in the dry tropics. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 10, 311–313. open url image1

Johnston DJ, Reverter A, Burrow HM, Oddy VH, Robinson DL (2003a) Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal, carcass, and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 1. Animal measures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 107–118.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Johnston DJ, Reverter A, Ferguson DM, Thompson JM, Burrow HM (2003b) Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal, carcass, and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 3. Meat quality traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 135–147.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kunzi N (1976) A flexible system for calculating various types of selection indices. In ‘Proceedings of the 27th EAAP Meeting’. Zurich, G.68.

McDonald A (2003) ‘Crush Test’, scoring of docility in Limousin cattle. (Updated 12 September 2005). Australian Limousin Breeders Society, Retrieved 15 July 2004 from http://users.northnet-com.au/%7Elimo/technical/tempscore/htm

Perry D, Shorthose WR, Ferguson DM, Thompson JM (2001) Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 953–957.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Petherick JC, Holroyd RG, Doogan VJ, Venus BK (2002) Productivity, carcass and meat quality of lot-fed Bos indicus cross steers grouped according to temperament. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 389–398.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Reverter A, Johnston DJ, Ferguson DM, Perry D, Goddard ME, Burrow HM, Oddy VH, Thompson JM, Bindon BM (2003) Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal, carcass and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 4. Correlations among animal, abattoir carcass, and meat quality traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 149–158.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

SAS (1991) ‘SAS User’s Guide.’ Release 6.03. (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC)

Thompson J , Egan A (2000) ‘Meat Standards Australia—meat science course.’ (University of New England: Armidale, NSW)

Tier B, Henshall JM, McSweeny JM (2001) Potential for improving the docility of Limousin cattle in Australia. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 345–347. open url image1

Upton WH, Burrow HM, Dundon A, Robinson DL, Farrell EB (2001) CRC breeding program design, measurements and database: methods that underpin CRC research results. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 943–952.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Voisinet BD, Grandin T, O’Connor SF, Tatum JD, Deesing MJ (1997) Bos indicus-cross feedlot cattle with excitable temperaments have tougher meat and a higher incidence of borderline dark cutters. Meat Science 46, 367–377.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1