Fibre diameter and staple strength of sheep selected for divergent clean fleece weight when subjected to an increase in intake or an increase in intake and diet change
M. A. Friend A C and G. E. Robards A BA Department of Wool and Animal Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
B Present address: 10 Clarence St, Glenbrook, NSW 2773, Australia.
C Corresponding author; present address: Wagga Wagga Agricultural Innovation Park, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia. Email: mfriend@csu.edu.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(2) 195-201 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR04134
Submitted: 16 June 2004 Accepted: 13 January 2005 Published: 28 February 2005
Abstract
Merino wethers with a high (fleece plus, Fl+) or low (fleece minus, Fl–) potential for wool growth were offered a restricted intake of either oat grain or lucerne chaff for 8 weeks followed by ad libitum lucerne chaff for 4 weeks. The Fl– sheep that were fed oats then lucerne had a lower (P < 0.05) intake during the first 2 weeks of ad libitum feeding than all other groups. Staple strength of Fl+ sheep (37.5 ± 2.2 N/ktex) was less (P < 0.05) than that of Fl– sheep (44.5 ± 2.4 N/ktex), and dietary treatment did not significantly affect staple strength. Wool growth rate was unaffected by dietary treatment, but was greater (P < 0.001) for Fl+ (6.4 ± 0.2 µg/mm2.day) than for Fl– (4.0 ± 0.2 µg/mm2.day) sheep. Along-fibre variation in diameter was greater (P < 0.001) in Fl+ (15.6 ± 0.5%) than in Fl– (9.9 ± 0.5%) sheep. Between-fibre variation in diameter was greater (P < 0.001) in Fl+ (16.5 ± 0.5%) than in Fl– (13.2 ± 0.5%) sheep, and between-fibre variation in diameter was affected (P < 0.05) by dietary treatment in Fl+ sheep. Staple strength was significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with along-fibre variation in diameter (r = –0.48), and stepwise regression analysis indicated that along-fibre variation in diameter, wool growth rate during early restricted feeding, and minimum fibre diameter explained 63% of the variance in staple strength. The results are discussed in relation to the lower staple strength of Fl+ sheep.
Additional keywords: Merino, fibre diameter, feed intake.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mrs Terry Barrell for her care of the sheep during the experiment and Mr David Petrie for his assistance in wool metrology. The authors also thank Prof. John James for his statistical advice. Part-funding for the work was supplied by Australian woolgrowers and the Federal Government as M.A.F. was in receipt of a postgraduate scholarship from the Australian Wool Research and Promotion Organisation (now Australian Wool Innovation).
Adams NR, Briegel JR
(1998) Liveweight and wool growth responses to a Mediterranean environment in three strains of Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1187–1193.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
AOAC (1980).
Baxter BP,
Brimms MA, Taylor TB
(1992) Description and performance of the Optical Fibre Diameter Analyser (OFDA). Journal of the Textile Institute 83, 507–526.
Brown DJ,
Crook BJ, Purvis IW
(2002) Differences in fibre diameter profile characteristics in wool staples from Merino sheep and their relationship with staple strength between years, environments and bloodlines. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 481–491.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Butcher G,
Eady S, Smith F
(1984) Preliminary observations on some factors which influence the tensile strength of wool. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15, 125–128.
Friend MA, Robards GE
(1995) Monitoring wool fibre diameter and length changes using gel emulsion autoradiography. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 55, 28–30.
Friend MA, Robards GE
(2003) The effect of ration sequence on the staple strength of genetically high and low wool producing Merino wethers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 923–932.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Friend MA,
Robards GE, Kennedy JP
(1996) Relationships between staple strength and fibre diameter changes in Merino sheep selectively bred for either high or low clean fleece weight. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 21, 111–114.
Hansford KA, Kennedy JP
(1990) The relationship between variation in fibre diameter along staples and staple strength. ‘Proceedings of the 8th International Wool Textile Research Conference’. Christchurch. Vol. 1. (Ed. GH Crawshaw )
pp. 590–598. (Wool Research Organisation of New Zealand: Christchurch)
Hogan JP, Weston RH
(1967) The digestion of two diets of differing protein content but with similar capacities to sustain wool growth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 973–981.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MAFF (1985).
Mata G,
Adams NR,
O’Dea TO,
Masters DG, Schlink AC
(1999) Is there a specific weakness in staple strength around the break of season? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 401–409.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NHMRC (1997).
Oddy VH, Robards GE, Low SG
(1983) Prediction of in vivo dry matter digestibility from the fibre and nitrogen content of a feed. ‘Feed information and animal production’. (Eds GE Robards, RG Packham)
pp. 395–398. (CABI: Farnham Royal, UK)
Peter DW, Doyle PT, Curtis KMS
(1993) Supplements for weaners. ‘Management for wool quality in Mediterranean environments’. (Eds PT Doyle, JA Fortune, NR Adams)
pp. 132–141. (WA Department of Agriculture: Perth, W. Aust.)
Peter DW,
Forman PJ, Baker SK
(1994) The influence of rate of change in feed intake on staple strength. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 20, 273–276.
Peterson AD,
Gherardi SG, Doyle PT
(1998) Components of staple strength in fine and broad wool Merino hoggets run together in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1181–1186.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
SAS Institute (1985).
SCA (Standing Committee on Agriculture) (1990).
Schlink AC,
Ritchie AJM, Lea JM
(2000) Effect of break of season in short-term fibre diameter changes in low and high staple strength Merino sheep. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 13 (Suppl.), 118.
Smuts M,
Meissner HH, Cronje PB
(1995) Retention time of digesta in the rumen: its repeatability and relationship with wool production in Merino rams. Journal of Animal Science 73, 206–210.
| PubMed |
van Soest PJ
(1963) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. 2. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 46, 829–835.
Thompson AN, Hynd PI
(1998) Wool growth and fibre diameter changes in young Merino sheep genetically different in staple strength and fed different levels of nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 889–898.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson BC,
Dellow DW, Barry TN
(1989) The effect of selection for fleece weight upon urea metabolism and digestive function in Romney sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 1065–1074.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wheeler JL,
Hedges DA, Mulcahy C
(1977) The use of dyebanding for measuring wool production and fleece tip wear in rugged and unrugged sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 721–735.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yamin M,
Hynd PI,
Ponzoni RW,
Hill JA,
Pitchford WS, Hansford KA
(1999) Is fibre diameter variation along the staple a good indirect selection criterion for staple strength? Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 47, 151–158.
