Contribution of objective and subjective attributes to the variation in commercial value of Australian mohair: implications for mohair production, genetic improvement, and mohair marketing
B. A. McGregor A C and K. L. Butler BA Primary Industries Research Victoria, Attwood, Vic. 3049, Australia.
B Primary Industries Research Victoria, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: bruce.mcgregor@dpi.vic.gov.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55(12) 1283-1298 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR04107
Submitted: 17 May 2004 Accepted: 11 November 2004 Published: 21 December 2004
Abstract
A database collected in the years 1998–01, from 2 mohair-selling agents in Australia, was analysed using multiple regression analysis to determine the effect on commercial sale prices of year, selling season within year, agent, mean fibre diameter (MFD), coefficient of variation of fibre diameter [CV(D)], vegetable matter base (VM), Schlumberger dry yield, visually assessed staple length, visually assessed fibre style, incidence of kemp, other faults, and interactions of these effects. The database consisted of 557 objectively measured lots. The weighted means ± s.d. of attributes analysed were: MFD, 30.9 ± 3.7 μm; CV(D), 29.1 ± 2.6%; VM, 1.0 ± 1.0%; Schlumberger dry yield, 84.0 ± 2.7%; lot weight, 1186 ± 938 kg. The final model for the price of greasy mohair had fixed terms involving a combination of selling agent, selling period, MFD, VM, and visual classing grades. This model accounted for 98% of the variation of the logarithm of greasy mohair price. Agent and selling period combinations accounted for 22% of the variation. Terms involving MFD accounted for 59% of the variation not accounted for by agent and period combinations. Although the response of greasy mohair price to MFD differed greatly with period, in the second quarter of 1999 the maximum relative price of greasy mohair was reached at a MFD of about 25 μm. The relative price typically declined to about 50% of the maximum at 30 μm and to a price of 10% of the maximum at 36 μm. The increase in relative value from poor to superior style mohair was about 43%. There were large discounts for length (up to 48%), kemp (up to 87%), and light stained mohair (70%). Deviations due to length differ with time and MFD. The discount for fault lines was proportionally higher when MFD was low, and proportionally less serious when the mohair MFD was high. The discount was proportionally greater the more serious the fault. There was a curvilinear response to the presence of VM in mohair and an interaction of VM with MFD, but these terms only accounted for the last 0.5% of the variation. After allowing for the effects of selling, agent, visual attributes, MFD, and VM, neither Schlumberger dry yield nor CV(D) was related to greasy mohair price. CV(D) was related to length, kemp, fault, and MFD. Apart from the current practice of price reporting on a greasy basis, the information supplied by agents provides transparency in mohair transactions as the current objective measurements and visual appraisal explain 97% of the variation not explained by agent and period of sale.
Acknowledgments
The data were willingly provided by the Australian Mohair Marketing Organisation Pty Ltd, Nerrandera, and National Mohair Pools Pty Ltd, Cudal. Mr C. Clancy and Dr D. Stapleton are thanked for their assistance.
Anon.
(1877) South Australian Advertiser. Friday, the 7th September, p.5.
Anon.
(1973) ‘Objective measurement of wool in Australia.’ Technical Report of the Australian Wool Board’s Objective Measurement Policy Committee. (Eds MW Andrews, JG Downes)
(Australian Wool Corporation: Melbourne, Vic.)
Anon., (2004a).
Anon., (2004b).
AWTA (2004).
Baxter BP, Cottle DJ
(1998) The use of mid side fleece fibre diameter distribution measurements in sheep selection. Wool Technology Sheep Breeding 46, 154–171.
Beatie W
(1961) Relationships among productive characters of Merino sheep in north-western Queensland. 1. Estimates of phenotypic parameters. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences 18, 437–445.
Beatie W
(1962) Relationships among productive characters of merino sheep in north-western Queensland. 2. Estimates of genetic parameters, with particular reference to selection for wool weight and crimp frequency. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences 19, 17–26.
Bigham ML
(1990) The genetics of goat fibre production. ‘Goat health and production. Proceeding No. 134’. pp. 31–45. (Post-Graduate Committee in Veterinary Science: University of Sydney, NSW)
Bow MR, Hansford KA
(1994) Fibre diameter variability. ‘Woolspec, 94 Proceedings’. (CSIRO Division of Wool Technology: Geelong, Vic.)
Butler KL
(2001) Counting precision for spinning fineness. Journal of the Textile Institute 92, 360–364.
Butler KL, Dolling M
(1995) Spinning fineness for wool. Journal of the Textile Institute 86, 164–165.
Carnaby GA, Kawabata S, Niwa M, Mori M, Saito K, Walls RJ
(1985) The utilisation of New Zealand wools in tropical fabrics. ‘Objective measurement: applications to product design and process control’. (Eds S Kawabata, R Postle, M Niwa)
pp. 75–82. (Textile Machinery Society of Japan: Osaka)
Charlton D, Whiteley KJ
(1973) Some observations on the relationship between subjective and objective estimates of yield. ‘Objective measurement of wool in Australia’. Technical Report of the Australian Wool Board’s Objective Measurement Policy Committee. Australian Wool Corporation, Melbourne, Vic.. Ch 10.
Clarke WMJ
(1976) The feral goat herd of Faure Island. Journal of Agriculture Western Australia 17, 102–106.
Cloete SWP,
Greeff JC, Lewer RP
(2002) Direct and maternal genetic (co)variances for hogget liveweight and fleece traits in Western Australian Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 271–279.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cottle DJ
(1994) Wool prices and sheep breeding objectives — a historical perspective. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 1671–1681.
Erasmus GJ
(1987) Performance testing on recording schemes for mohair production. ‘Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Goats’. Brasilia, Brazil, Vol 1.. (Ed. OP Santana ,
AG da Silva ,
WC Foote )
pp. 643–655. (Embrapa-DDT: Brazil)
Ferguson M
(2002) Mohair sire evaluation project. Mohair Australia Newsletter 12, 8.
GenStat Committee (2000).
Gifford DR
(1988) Development of practical breeding objectives for Australian fibre goats. ‘Proceedings 7th Conference Australian Association Animal Breeding and Genetics’. (Australian Association Animal Breeding and Genetics)
Gifford DR,
Ponzini RW,
Lampe RJ, Burr J
(1991) Phenotypic and genetic parameters of fleece traits and live weight in South Australian Angora goats. Small Ruminant Research 4, 293–302.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregory IP
(1982) Genetic studies of South Australian Merino sheep. IV Genetic, phenotypic and environmental correlations between various wool and body traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 363–373.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunter, L (1993).
Hunter L,
Smuts S, Dorfling L
(1997) Influence of style and character on the textile performance of Cape mohair. Melliand International Textile Reports 78, 221–224.
Ip SY
(1971) From wool to mohair? The commercial prospects for an Australian mohair industry. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 37, 327–333.
James PJ,
Ponzoni RW,
Walkley JRW, Whiteley KJ
(1990) Genetic parameters for wool production and traits in South Australian Merinos of the Collinsville family group. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 583–594.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lamb PR
(1997) Wool quality for spinners Report No. WT97.05, CSIRO Division of Wool Technology, Geelong, Vic.
Leeder JD, McGregor BA, Steadman RG
(1992) A review and interpretation of existing research results on raw-fibre-to-end-product properties and performance of goat fibres. Report to Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 117 p. Textile and Fibre Research Institute, Melbourne, Vic..
Leeder JD, McGregor BA, Steadman RG
(1998) Properties and performance of goat fibre: a review and interpretation of existing research results. RIRDC Research Paper No. 98/22, Rural Industries Research Development Corporation: Barton, ACT.
Lupton CJ,
Pfeiffer FA, Blakeman NE
(1991) Medullation in mohair. Small Ruminant Research 5, 357–365.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ly NG
(1983) The contribution of the fibre-diameter distribution to the bending rigidity of yarns. Journal of the Textile Institute 74, 228–230.
Martindale JG
(1945) A new method of measuring the irregularity of yarns with some observations on the origin of irregularities in worsted slivers and yarns. Journal of the Textile Institute 36, T35–T47.
McGregor BA
(1995) Improving kid survival and mohair quality by improved nutritional management of reproducing does. Final Report RIRDC Project DAV 42A, 94, Agriculture Victoria, Attwood, Vic.
McGregor BA
(1997) The influence of mohair style and character in processing. Mohair Australia
(Suppl. 5.),
McGregor BA
(1998a) Does mohair have an allergy problem? or, why mohair breeders should use spinning fineness. Mohair Australia 7, 11–15.
McGregor BA
(1998b) Nutrition, management and other environmental influences on the quality and production of mohair and cashmere with particular reference to mediterranean and annual temperate climatic zones: a review. Small Ruminant Research 28, 199–215.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGregor BA
(2000) Recent advances in marketing and product development of mohair and cashmere. ‘Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Goats’. (Ed. L Gruner ,
Y Chabert )
pp. 631–637. (INRA: France)
McGregor BA
(2002) Australian cashmere — attributes and processing. RIRDC Research Paper No.02/112, pp. 59 + ix. Rural Industries Research Development Corporation, Barton, ACT.
McGregor BA
(2002) Extent and source of short and cotted mohair. RIRDC Research Paper No.02/108, pp. 60 + viii. Rural Industries Research Development Corporation, Barton, ACT.
Minikhiem DL,
Lupton CJ,
Pfeiffer FA,
Qi K and
Marschall JR
(1994)
Extent and source of short and cotted mohair.
Naylor GRS,
Phillips DG, Veitch CJ
(1995) The relative importance of mean fibre diameter and coefficient of variation of sale lots in determining the potential skin comfort of wool fabrics. Wool Technology Sheep Breeding 43, 69–82.
Newton Turner, H ,
and
Young, SSY (1969).
Onions, WJ (1962).
Pezic A
(2001) BApplSc (Hons) thesis. Department of Statistics and Operations Research, RMIT University, Melbourne, Vic.
Statter K
(1992) Improvements in marketing of Australian mohair. Animal Production in Australia 19, 255–262.
Smuts, S ,
Schleth, A ,
and
Hunter, L (1996).
Stapleton DL
(1976) Medullated fibre in the Australian Angora goat. Animal Production in Australia 11, 45–48.
Stapleton DL
(1980) Mohair classing and its role in marketing. Animal Production in Australia 13, 191–194.
Stapleton, DL (1981).
Stapleton DL
(1988) A report on performance recording of Angora goats with special consideration of the implementation of a National Mohair Performance Recording Scheme for the Australian Angora/mohair industry. Australian Mohair Research Foundation Ltd., Canberra, ACT..
Turpie, DWF (1985). ‘Some of SAWTRI’s important research findings on mohair.’ SAWTRI Special Publication. (South African Wool and Textile Research Institute: Port Elizabeth)
van der Vyver P
(2002) Increase your income!! The Angora Goat and Mohair Journal 44, 59–60.
van der Westhuysen JM
(1982) Mohair as a textile fibre. ‘Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Goat Production and Diseases’. (Dairy Goat Journal Publishing Co: Scottsdale AZ)
van der Westhuysen JM
(1992) The essence of mohair promotion. The Angora Goat and Mohair Journal 34, 14–15.
van der Westhuysen, JM ,
Wentzel, D ,
and
Grobler, MC (1988).
Whiteley KJ, Charlton D
(1973) Some observations on the relationship of quality number, crimp frequency and fibre diameter in Australian greasy-wool sale-lots. ‘Objective Measurement of Wool in Australia’. (Eds MW Andrews, JG Downes)
(Technical Report of the Australian Wool Board’s Objective Measurement Policy Committee.)
Wilson, S (1873).
Yalcin BC
(1982) Angora goat breeding. ‘Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Goat Production and Disease’. (Dairy Goat Publishing Co.: Scottsdale, AZ)
