Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Bentazone uptake into plant foliage as influenced by surfactants and carrier pH

Z. Q. Liu
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua, New Zealand; present address: UMR INRA-ENSAR, Amélioration des Plantes et Biotechnologies Végétales, BP 35327, 35653 Le Rheu Cedex, France; email: Zhiqian_liu@hotmail.com

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55(9) 967-971 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR04046
Submitted: 20 February 2004  Accepted: 26 July 2004   Published: 24 September 2004

Abstract

The influence of surfactants and carrier pH on the foliar uptake of bentazone, a representative weak acid herbicide, was studied using bean (Vicia faba) and mustard (Sinapis alba) plants. The promoting effect of surfactants on bentazone uptake varied with surfactant hydrophobe structure, ethylene oxide (EO) content, and surfactant and bentazone concentrations. Among the 5 hydrophobe moieties tested, the efficiency order was C13 /C15 linear alcohols > C10 linear alcohol > C16 /C18 linear alcohols > nonylphenol > octylphenol. For C13 /C15 linear alcohol surfactants of differing EO content, the enhancing effect on bentazone uptake was 5 EO > 10 EO > 14 EO. All surfactants improved uptake more when bentazone was applied at low concentration. The effect of carrier pH (5, 7, and 9) on the uptake of bentazone, applied both as unformulated acid and as a sodium salt, was also investigated in this work. Lower carrier pH did not provide greater uptake for bentazone sodium salt and was only beneficial for the uptake of bentazone acid applied at very low concentration. The results are discussed in relation to the current knowledge on pesticide uptake as influenced by surfactants and the change in lipophilicity and solubility of weak acid chemicals at different pH.

Additional keyword: weak acid herbicides.


Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to BASF, Germany, for supplying 14C-bentazone and some of the surfactants used in this work.


References


Bukovac MJ, Petracek PD (1993) Characterizing pesticide and surfactant penetration with isolated plant cuticles. Pesticide Science 37, 179–194. open url image1

Foy CL (1993) Progress and developments in adjuvant use since 1989 in the USA. Pesticide Science 38, 65–76. open url image1

Gaskin RE, Holloway PJ (1992) Some physico-chemical factors influencing foliar uptake enhancement of glyphosate-mono(isopropylammonium) by polyoxyethylene surfactants. Pesticide Science 34, 195–206. open url image1

Gronwald JW, Jourdan SW, Wyse DL, Somers DA, Magnusson MU (1993) Effect of ammonium sulfate on absorption of imazethapyr by quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) and maize (Zea mays) cell suspension cultures. Weed Science 41, 325–334. open url image1

Holloway PJ, Edgerton BM (1992) Effects of formulation with different adjuvants on foliar uptake of difenzoquat and 2,4-D: model experiments with wild oat and field bean. Weed Research 32, 183–195. open url image1

Kirkwood RC (1993) Use and mode of action of adjuvants for herbicides: a review of some current work. Pesticide Science 38, 93–102. open url image1

Liebl RA, Zehr UB, Teyker RH (1992) Influence of nitrogen form on extracellular pH and bentazone uptake by cultured soybean (Glycine max) cells. Weed Science 40, 418–423. open url image1

Liu ZQ (1993) Mechanisms of absorption of pendimethalin and imazaquin by dodder seedlings. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica 7, 231–236. open url image1

Liu ZQ (2001) Influence of surfactants on foliar uptake of herbicides. ‘Proceedings of the 18th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference’. Beijing. (Ed. H Ni ) pp. 561–566.


Liu ZQ (2003) Characterisation of glyphosate uptake into grass species. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 877–884.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nalewaja JD, Devilliers B, Matysiak R (1996) Surfactant and salt affect glyphosate retention and absorption. Weed Research 36, 241–247. open url image1

Schönherr J, Baur P (1994) Modelling penetration of plant cuticles by crop protection agents and effects of adjuvants on their rates of penetration. Pesticide Science 42, 185–208. open url image1

Sharma SD, Kirkwood RC, Whateley TL (1996) Effect of nonionic nonylphenol surfactants on surface physicochemical properties, uptake and distribution of asulam and diflufenican. Weed Research 36, 227–239. open url image1

Sterling TM, Balke NE, Silverman DS (1990) Uptake and accumulation of the herbicide bentazone by cultured plant cells. Plant Physiology 92, 1121–1127. open url image1

Sterling TM, Lownds NK (1992) Picloram absorption by broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) leaf tissues. Weed Science 40, 390–394. open url image1

Stock D, Holloway PJ, Grayson PD, Whitehouse P (1993) Development of a predictive uptake model to rationalise selection of polyoxyethylene surfactant adjuvants for foliar-applied agrochemicals. Pesticide Science 37, 233–245. open url image1

Thompson WM, Nissen SJ, Masters RA (1996) Adjuvant effects on imazethapyr, 2,4-D and picloram absorption by leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Science 44, 469–475. open url image1

Van Ellis RM, Shaner DL (1988) Mechanism of cellular absorption of imidazolinones in soybean (Glycine max) leaf discs. Pesticide Science 23, 25–34. open url image1