Feeding strategies for grain-fed cattle in a hot environment*
Simone M. Holt A C , John. B. Gaughan A D and Terry L. Mader BA School of Animal Studies, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.
B Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 57905 866 Rd Concord, NE 68728, USA.
C Present address: Department of Animal and Range Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
D Corresponding author; email: j.gaughan@uq.edu.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55(7) 719-725 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03261
Submitted: 17 December 2003 Accepted: 13 May 2004 Published: 2 August 2004
Abstract
Six Bos taurus (Hereford) steers (body weight 324 ± 22 kg) were used in a 45-day study with a replicated 3 × 3 Latin-square design. Three treatments [ad libitum feeding (ADLIB); limit feeding, 85% of ad libitum (LIMIT); bunk management feeding where steers were only given access to feed from 1600 to 0800 hours the following day (BUNK)] were imposed over 3 periods, with 2 steers assigned to each treatment in each period. Cattle were managed in a temperature-controlled metabolism unit and were exposed to both thermoneutral (17.7°C–26.1°C) and hot (16.7°C–32.9°C) environmental conditions. By design, during the thermoneutral period, the ADLIB cattle displayed greater intake (P < 0.05) than the LIMIT group, with the BUNK group being intermediate. However, during the hot period, both the LIMIT and BUNK treatment groups increased feed intake 4–5%, whereas feed intake of the ADLIB treatment group declined nearly 2%. During both periods respiration rate (RR, breath/min) followed the same pattern that was observed for feed intake, with the greatest (P < 0.05) RR found in the ADLIB treatment group (81.09 and 109.55, thermoneutral and hot, respectively) and lowest (P < 0.05) RR in the LIMIT treatment group (74.47 and 102.76, thermoneutral and hot, respectively). Rectal temperature (RT) did not differ among treatments during the thermoneutral period or the first hot day, although during the thermoneutral period the ADLIB treatment group did tend to display a lower RT, possibly as a result of other physiological processes (pulse rate and RR) aiding to keep RT lower. During the hot period, differences in RT were found on Day 5, with the LIMIT cattle having lower (P < 0.10) RT (38.92°C) than the ADLIB (39.18°C) cattle, with BUNK cattle RT (39.14°C) being intermediate. However, when hourly data were examined, the ADLIB cattle had greater (P < 0.05) RT than the BUNK and LIMIT at 1800 hours and greater RT (P < 0.05) than the LIMIT group at 1400, 1500, and 1600 hours. Clearly, a change in diurnal RT pattern was obtained by using the LIMIT and BUNK feeding regimen. Both of these groups displayed a peak RT during the hot conditions, between 2100 and 2200 hours, whereas the ADLIB group displayed a peak RT between 1400 and 1500 hours, a time very close to when peak climatic stress occurs.
Based on these results it is apparent that feedlot managers could alleviate the effects of adverse hot weather on cattle by utilising either a limit-feeding regimen or altering bunk management practices to prevent feed from being consumed several hours prior to the hottest portion of the day.
Additional keywords: beef cattle, heat stress, feedlot, feeding regimen.
Amsby HP, Kriss M
(1921) Some fundamentals of stable ventilation. Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 343–368.
Brosh A,
Aharoni Y,
Degen AA,
Wright D, Young B
(1998) Effects of solar radiation, dietary energy, and time of feeding on thermoregulatory responses and energy balance in cattle in a hot environment. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2671–2677.
| PubMed |
Burrin DG,
Ferrel CL,
Britton RA, Bauer M
(1990) Level of nutrition and visceral organ size and metabolic activity in sheep. The British Journal of Nutrition 64, 439–448.
| PubMed |
Carstens GE,
Johnson DE,
Elenberger MA, Tatum JD
(1991) Physical and chemical components of empty body during compensatory growth in beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 69, 3251–3264.
| PubMed |
Conrad JH
(1985) Feeding farm animals in hot and cold environments. ‘Stress physiology in livestock basic principles’. Vol. II,(Ed. MK Yousef)
pp. 205–226. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)
Cossins, AR ,
and
Bowler, K (1987).
Davis MS,
Mader TL,
Holt SM, Parkhurst AM
(2002) Strategies to reduce feedlot cattle heat stress: effects on tympanic temperature. Journal of Animal Science 81, 649–661.
Gaughan JB,
Mader TL,
Holt SM,
Josey MJ, Rowan KJ
(1999) Heat tolerance of Boran and Tuli crossbred steers. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2398–2405.
| PubMed |
Gaughan JB,
Mader TL,
Savage D, Young BA
(1996) Effect of feeding regimen on feed intake of cattle exposed to heat. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 21, 223–226.
Graham NM, Searle TW
(1972) Balance of energy and matter in growing sheep at several ages, body weights and planes of nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 97–108.
| Crossref |
Hahn GL
(1995) Environmental influences on feed intake and performance of feedlot cattle. ‘Symposium: Intake by Feedlot Cattle’. (Ed. FN Owens )
pp. 207–225. (Oklahoma State University: Stillwater, OK)
Hahn GL
(1999) Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. Journal of Animal Science Suppl. 2 77, 10–20.
| PubMed |
Hicks RB,
Owens FN,
Gill DR,
Martin JJ, Strasia CA
(1990) Effects of controlled feed intake on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers and heifers. Journal of Animal Science 68, 233–244.
Holt SM,
Mader TL,
Gaughan JB,
Lisle A, Scott TL
(1999) Limit feeding feedlot cattle during the summer. Asian–Australian Journal of Animal Science Suppl. C 13, 329–332.
Kabunga JD
(1992) The influence of thermal conditions on rectal temperature, respiration rate and pulse rate of lactating Holstein-Fresian cows in the humid tropics. International Journal of Biometeorology 36, 146–150.
| PubMed |
Koong LJ,
Ferrell CL, Nienaber JA
(1985) Assessment of interrelationships among levels of intake and production, organ size and fasting heat production in growing animals. The Journal of Nutrition 115, 1383–1390.
| PubMed |
Lapierre H,
Bernier JF,
Dubreuil P,
Reynolds CK,
Farmer C,
Ouellet DR, Lobley GE
(2000) The effect of feed intake on splanchnic metabolism in growing beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1084–1099.
| PubMed |
Lawrence RJ
(1998) A comparison of feedlot bunk management strategies and their influence on cattle performance and health. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 22, 177–180.
LCI (1970).
Ledger HP, Sayers AR
(1977) The utilization of dietary energy by steers during periods of restricted feed intake and subsequent realimentation. 1. The effect of time on the maintenance requirements of steers held at constant weight. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 11–26.
Lefcourt AM, Adams WR
(1996) Radiotelemetry measurement of body temperatures of feedlot steers during the summer. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2633–2640.
| PubMed |
Luiten PGM,
ter Horst GJ, Steffens AB
(1987) The hypothalamus, intrinsic connections and outflow pathways to the endocrine system in relation to the controlling of feeding and metabolism. Progress in Neurobiology 28, 1–54.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
MacRae JC, Lobley GE
(1982) Some factors which influence thermal energy losses during the metabolism of ruminants. Livestock Production Science 9, 447–456.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mader TL
(2003) Environmental stress in confined beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science E. Suppl. 2 76, E110–E119.
Mader TL,
Gaughan JB, Young BA
(1999) Feedlot diet roughage level for Hereford cattle exposed to excessive heat load. Professional Animal Science 15, 53–62.
Mader TL,
Holt SM,
Hahn GL,
Davis MS, Spiers DE
(2002) Feeding strategies for managing heat load in feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2373–2382.
| PubMed |
Mallonee PG,
Beede DK,
Collier RJ, Wilcox CJ
(1985) Production and physiological responses of dairy cows to varying dietary potassium during heat stress. Journal of Dairy Science 68, 1479–1487.
| PubMed |
McDowell RE
(1974) Effect of environment on the functional efficiency of ruminants. ‘Livestock Environment: Proceedings of the 1st International Livestock Symposium’. Lincoln, Nebraska.. (American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St. Joseph, MO)
Murphy TA, Loerch SC
(1994) Effects of restricted feeding of growing steers on performance, carcass characteristics, and composition. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2497–2507.
| PubMed |
NRC (1981).
NRC (1996).
Purwanto BP,
Abo Y,
Sakamoto R,
Furumoto F, Yamamoto S
(1990) Diurnal patterns of heat production and heart rate under thermoneutral conditions in Holstein-Friesian cows differing in milk production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 114, 139–142.
Reinhardt CD, Brandt RT
(1994) Effect of morning vs evening feeding of limited-fed Holsteins during summer months. Kansas State University Cattleman’s Day Report, Manhattan, KS.
Reynolds CK,
Tyrell HF, Reynolds PJ
(1991) Effects of diet forage-to-concentrate ration and intake on energy metabolism in growing beef heifers: whole body energy and nitrogen balance and visceral heat production. The Journal of Nutrition 121, 994–1003.
| PubMed |
SAS (1996).
Thom EC
(1959) The discomfort index. Weatherwise 12, 57–59.
Thorbek G, Henckel S
(1976) Studies on energy requirements for maintenance in farm animals. Proceedings of Energy Metabolism Symposium 19, 117–120.
Turner HG, Taylor CS
(1983) Dynamic factors in models of energy utilization with particular reference to maintenance requirements of cattle. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 42, 135–190.
| PubMed |
USDC-ESSA (1970).
Webster AJF, Osuji PO, Weekes TEC
(1976) Origins of the heat increment of feeding in sheep. ‘Energy metabolism of farm animals, 7th Symposium’. (Ed. M Vermorel )
pp. 45–53. (European Association of Animal Production: De Bussac, Clermont-Ferrand, France)
Webster AJF,
Osuji PO,
White F, Ingram JF
(1975) The influence of food intake on portal blood flow and heat production in the digestive tract of sheep. The British Journal of Nutrition 34, 125–139.
| PubMed |
* Published as Journal series no. 13575, Agric. Res. Div., University of Nebraska.
