Register      Login
Australian and New Zealand Continence JournalAustralian and New Zealand Continence Journal SocietyAustralian and New Zealand Continence Journal Society
Connecting health professionals and academics across Australasia with the latest research, insights, and innovations in continence care, from diagnosis and treatment to best practices in promoting continence
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Introduction of the UroShield® in district nursing: a case study

Emma Rose Watson A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Health New Zealand, Te Pae Hauora o Ruahine o Tararua MidCentral, Palmerston North, New Zealand.


Australian and New Zealand Continence Journal 31, CJ24043 https://doi.org/10.1071/CJ24043
Submitted: 20 December 2024  Accepted: 23 January 2025  Published: 11 March 2025

© 2025 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of Continence Health Australia (CHA). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

This case study reviews a Quality Improvement (QI) project where the UroShield® device was introduced to patients with an indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) within a District Nursing Service (DNS) in New Zealand. Patients with IUCs often require more frequent interventions to maintain patency; however, best-practice guidelines state to avoid disruption to the sterile closed system as much as possible. The primary aim for the QI project was to improve patients’ quality of life (QoL) via reducing frequency of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs); reducing blockages and leakage; and improving overall comfort of the catheter, resulting in less catheter-related interventions. Secondary aims were to reduce costs to the service and organisation due to the use of less consumables; reduction in acute and planned nursing home visits for catheter management; reduction in the use of antibiotic therapy and risk of antibiotic-resistant colonisation; and removal of the financial burden of frequent General Practitioner (GP) appointments and prescription fees. The case study reviewed a small cohort of five patients who commenced UroShield® with analysis from 5 months pre- and post- UroShield® showing positive primary and secondary outcomes. There was an improvement in CAUTI and reduced prevalence of blockages, less nursing time required which positively impacted on the workload of the service, which in turn, led to cost savings for the organisation. The key recommendation arising from the QI project within the DNS, is that UroShield® be adopted as an option for appropriate IUC patients. A further randomised controlled trial is needed to examine the specific impact on QoL for patients within the cohort.

Keywords: biofilm management, blockage of IUC, CAUTI, complications of IUC, district nursing catheter management, long-term urinary catheter, UroShield, UTI prevention.

References

MidCentral District Health Board. Annual report for year ended 30 June 2021. Pūrongo ā-tau. Palmerston North, NZ: MidCentral District Health Board; 2021. Available at https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/publications/midcentral-dhb-annual-report-2020-2021 [cited 24 February 2025]

Mackay WG, MacIntosh T, Kydd A, Fleming A, O’Kane C, Shepherd A, et al. Living with an indwelling urethral catheter in a community setting: exploring triggers for unscheduled community nurse “out-of-hours” visits. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27(3–4): 866-75.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Holroyd S. Blocked urinary catheters: what can nurses do to improve management? Br J Community Nurs 2019; 24(9): 444-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Jordan DA. The role of the district nurse in managing blocked urinary catheters. Br J Community Nurs 2022; 27(7): 350-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Dean J, Ostaszkiewicz J. Current evidence about catheter maintenance solutions for managment of catheter blockage in long-term urinary catheterisation. Aust N Z Cont J 25(3): 74-80.
| Google Scholar |

Gibney LE. Blocked urinary catheters: can they be better managed? Br J Nurs 2016; 25(15): 828-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lydeamore MJ, Mitchell BG, Bucknall T, Cheng AC, Russo PL, Stewardson AJ. Burden of five healthcare associated infections in Australia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2022; 11(1): 69.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Grae N, Singh A, Jowitt D, Flynn A, Mountier E, Clendon G, et al. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in public hospitals in New Zealand, 2021. J Hosp Infect 2023; 131: 164-72.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Musco S, Giammò A, Savoca F, Gemma L, Geretto P, Soligo M, et al. How to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a reappraisal of vico’s theory – is history repeating itself? J Clin Med 2022; 11(12): 3415.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

10  Smith DRM, Pouwels KB, Hopkins S, Naylor NR, Smieszek T, Robotham JV. Epidemiology and health-economic burden of urinary-catheter-associated infection in English NHS hospitals: a probabilistic modelling study. J Hosp Infect 2019; 103(1): 44-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

11  Hernandez M, King A, Stewart L. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention and nurses’ checklist documentation of their indwelling catheter management practices. Nurs Prax Aotearoa N Z 2019; 35(1): 29-42.
| Google Scholar |

12  Menegueti MG, Ciol MA, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Auxiliadora-Martins M, Gaspar GG, Canini SRMdS, et al. Long-term prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among critically ill patients through the implementation of an educational program and a daily checklist for maintenance of indwelling urinary catheters: a quasi-experimental study. Medicine 2019; 98(8): e14417.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

13  Newman DK, Rovner ES, Wein AJ. Indwelling (transurethral and suprapubic) catheters. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-14821-2 [cited 18 October 2024]

14  Shepherd A, Newman DK, Bradway C, Jost S, Waddell D, Mackay WG, et al. Impact of practice on quality of life of those living with an indwelling urinary catheter – an international evaluation. Urol Nurs 2023; 43(4): 162.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

15  Shepherd AJ, Mackay WG, Hagen S. Washout policies in long-term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (3) (3) CD004012.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

16  Geng V, Lurvink H, Pearce I, Vahr Lauridsen S. Indwelling catheterisation in adults. European Association of Urological Nurses; 2024.

17  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Healthcare-associated infections: prevention and control in primary and community care; 2012. Available at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg139

18  Gethffe KA. Bladder instillations and bladder washouts in the management of catheterized patients. J Adv Nurs 1996; 23(3): 548-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

19  Marcone Marchitti C, Boarin M, Villa G. Encrustations of the urinary catheter and prevention strategies: an observational study. Int J Urol Nurs 2015; 9(3): 138-42.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

20  Rajaramon S, Shanmugam K, Dandela R, Solomon AP. Emerging evidence-based innovative approaches to control catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13: 1134433.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

21  Loike JD, Plitt A, Kothari K, Zumeris J, Budhu S, Kavalus K, et al. Surface acoustic waves enhance neutrophil killing of bacteria. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(8): e68334.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

22  Navarro S, Sherman E, Colmer-Hamood JA, Nelius T, Myntti M, Hamood AN. Urinary catheters coated with a novel biofilm preventative agent inhibit biofilm development by diverse bacterial uropathogens. Antibiotics 2022; 11(11): 1514.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

23  Abdel-fattah M, Johnson D, Constable L, Thomas R, Cotton S, Tripathee S, et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study. Trials 2022; 23(1): 630.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

24  Davis M. When guidelines conflict: patient safety, quality of life, and CAUTI reduction in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2019; 5(1): 56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

25  Balik V, Šulla I. Autonomic dysreflexia following spinal cord injury. Asian J Neurosurg 2022; 17(02): 165-72.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

26  European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on urological infections. Arnhem, Netherlands: EUA Guidelines Office; 2023. Available at https://uroweb.org/guidelines

27  Köves B, Magyar A, Tenke P. Spectrum and antibiotic resistance of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. GMS Infect Dis 2017; 5: Doc06.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

28  Van Meel TD, De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ. The effect of intravesical oxybutynin on the ice water test and on electrical perception thresholds in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29(3): 391-4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

29  D’Incau S, Atkinson A, Leitner L, Kronenberg A, Kessler TM, Marschall J. Bacterial species and antimicrobial resistance differ between catheter and non–catheter-associated urinary tract infections: data from a national surveillance network. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2023; 3(1): e55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

30  Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21(8): 510-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

31  Hazan Z, Zumeris J, Jacob H, Raskin H, Kratysh G, Vishnia M, et al. Effective prevention of microbial biofilm formation on medical devices by low-energy surface acoustic waves. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50(12): 4144-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

32  Wang L, Zhang S, Keatch R, Corner G, Nabi G, Murdoch S, et al. In-vitro antibacterial and anti-encrustation performance of silver-polytetrafluoroethylene nanocomposite coated urinary catheters. J Hosp Infect 2019; 103(1): 55-63.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

33  Wille JC, Van Oud Alblas AB, Thewessen EAPM. Nosocomial catheter-associated bacteriuria: a clinical trial comparing two closed urinary drainage systems. J Hosp Infect 1993; 25(3): 191-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

34  Madeo M, Barr B, Owen E. A study to determine whether the use of a preconnect urinary catheter system reduces the incidence of nosocomial urinary tract infections. J Infect Prev 2009; 10(2): 76-80.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

35  Pomfret I, Bayait F, Mackenzie R, Wells M, Winder A. Using bladder instillations to manage indwelling catheters. Br J Nurs 2004; 13(5): 261-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

36  Mayes J, Bliss J, Griffiths P. Preventing blockage of long-term indwelling catheters in adults: are citric acid solutions effective? Br J Community Nurs 2003; 8(4): 172-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

37  Da Silva K, Ibbotson A, O’Neill M. The effectiveness of Uroshield in reducing urinary tract infections and patients’ pain complaints: retrospective data analysis from clinical practice. Med Surg Urol 2021; 10: 254.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

38  Markowitz S, Rosenblum J, Goldstein M, Gadagkar HP, Litman L. The effect of surface acoustic waves on bacterial load and preventing Catheter- associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) in long term indwelling catheters. Med Surg Urol 2018; 07(04): 210.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

39  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Uroshield for preventing cathter-associated urinary tract infections; 2022. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg69

40  Gesmudno M. Enhancing nurse’s knowledge on catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention. Kai Tiaki Nurs Res 7(1): 32-40.
| Google Scholar |

41  Harrison JM, Dick AW, Madigan EA, Furuya EY, Chastain AM, Shang J. Urinary catheter policies in home healthcare agencies and hospital transfers due to urinary tract infection. Am J Infect Control 2022; 50(7): 743-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

42  Nibbelink CW, Brewer BB. Decision-making in nursing practice: an integrative literature review. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27(5–6): 917-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

43  Carrasco PM, Crespo DP, Rubio CM, Montenegro-Peña M. Loneliness in the elderly: association with health variables, pain, and cognitive performance. a population-based study. Clínica Salud 2022; 33(2): 51-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

44  Hughes Spence S, Khurshid Z, Flynn M, Fitzsimons J, De Brún A. A narrative inquiry into healthcare staff resilience and the sustainability of quality improvement implementation efforts during Covid-19. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23(1): 195.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

45  McKendry M, Green H. Improving the personalisation of care in a district nursing team: a service improvement project. Br J Community Nurs 2018; 23(11): 552-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

46  Tay LJ, Lyons H, Karrouze I, Taylor C, Khan AA, Thompson PM. Impact of the lack of community urinary catheter care services on the Emergency Department. BJU Int 2016; 118(2): 327-34.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

47  Maybin J, Charles A, Honeyman M. Understanding quality in district nursing services: learning from patients, carers and staff. London: The King’s Fund; 2016.

48  New Zealand Nurses Organisation. NZNO practice guidelines: documentation; 2012. Available at https://www.nzno.org.nz/Portals/0/publications/Guideline%20-%20Documentation,%202021.pdf