Synthesis and stability studies of constrained peptide–antimony bicycles
Sven Ullrich A # , Pritha Ghosh A # , Minghao Shang A , Sauhta Siryer A , Santhanalaxmi Kumaresan A , Bishvanwesha Panda A , Lani J. Davies A , Upamali Somathilake A , Abhishek P. Patel A and Christoph Nitsche A *A
Handling Editor: Curt Wentrup
Abstract
Peptide therapeutics play an increasingly important role in modern drug discovery. Improving the pharmacokinetic profile of bioactive peptides has been effectively achieved with chemical modifications, especially macrocyclisation reactions. Consequently, there is a great demand for highly constrained compounds such as bicyclic peptides. In our previous research, we introduced peptide–bismuth bicycles and peptide–arsenic bicycles as new classes of constrained peptides. In this work, we extend our peptide bicyclisation strategy towards antimony. Similar to arsenic and bismuth, antimony(III) selectively binds to three cysteine residues in peptides, enabling the in situ formation of stable bicycles. The bicyclisation reaction occurs instantaneously under biocompatible conditions at physiological pH. Antimony–peptide bicycles remain largely intact in the presence of the common metal chelator ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and the main endogenous thiol competitor glutathione (GSH). Furthermore, when challenged with bismuth(III) from water-soluble gastrodenol (bismuth tripotassium dicitrate), antimony–peptide bicycles convert into the corresponding bismuth–peptide bicycle, highlighting the superior thiophilicity of bismuth over other pnictogens. Our study further expands the toolbox of peptide multicyclisation with main group elements previously underexplored in chemical biology.
Keywords: antimony, bicycles, bismuth, cyclisation, cysteine, macrocycles, peptides, pnictogens.
References
1 Sharma K, Sharma KK, Sharma A, Jain R. Peptide-based drug discovery: current status and recent advances. Drug Discov Today 2023; 28: 103464.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Lubell WD. Peptide-based drug development. Biomedicines 2022; 10: 2037.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Muttenthaler M, King GF, Adams DJ, Alewood PF. Trends in peptide drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2021; 20: 309-325.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Erak M, Bellmann-Sickert K, Els-Heindl S, Beck-Sickinger AG. Peptide chemistry toolbox – transforming natural peptides into peptide therapeutics. Bioorg Med Chem 2018; 26: 2759-2765.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Ji X, Nielsen AL, Heinis C. Cyclic peptides for drug development. Angew Chem Int Ed 2024; 63: e202308251.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Lau YH, de Andrade P, Wu Y, Spring DR. Peptide stapling techniques based on different macrocyclisation chemistries. Chem Soc Rev 2015; 44: 91-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Ullrich S, Nitsche C. Bicyclic peptides: paving the road for therapeutics of the future. Pept Sci 2024; 116: e24326.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
8 Baeriswyl V, Heinis C. Polycyclic peptide therapeutics. ChemMedChem 2013; 8: 377-384.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
9 Vinogradov AA, Yin Y, Suga H. Macrocyclic peptides as drug candidates: recent progress and remaining challenges. J Am Chem Soc 2019; 141: 4167-4181.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Jing X, Jin K. A gold mine for drug discovery: strategies to develop cyclic peptides into therapies. Med Res Rev 2020; 40: 753-810.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Zhang H, Chen S. Cyclic peptide drugs approved in the last two decades (2001–2021). RSC Chem Biol 2022; 3: 18-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Morrison C. Constrained peptides’ time to shine? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2018; 17: 531-533.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Passioura T, Katoh T, Goto Y, Suga H. Selection-based discovery of druglike macrocyclic peptides. Annu Rev Biochem 2014; 83: 727-752.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Sohrabi C, Foster A, Tavassoli A. Methods for generating and screening libraries of genetically encoded cyclic peptides in drug discovery. Nat Rev Chem 2020; 4: 90-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Alleyne C, Amin RP, Bhatt B, Bianchi E, Blain JC, Boyer N, et al. Series of novel and highly potent cyclic peptide PCSK9 inhibitors derived from an mRNA display screen and optimized via structure-based design. J Med Chem 2020; 63: 13796-13824.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Tucker TJ, Embrey MW, Alleyne C, Amin RP, Bass A, Bhatt B, et al. A series of novel, highly potent, and orally bioavailable next-generation tricyclic peptide PCSK9 inhibitors. J Med Chem 2021; 64: 16770-16800.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
17 Kusumoto Y, Hayashi K, Sato S, Yamada T, Kozono I, Nakata Z, et al. Highly potent and oral macrocyclic peptides as a HIV-1 protease inhibitor: mRNA display-derived hit-to-lead optimization. ACS Med Chem Lett 2022; 13: 1634-1641.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 Sawyer TK, Biswas K. Peptide drug discovery raison d’etre: engineering mindset, design rules and screening tools. In: SV Ghodge, K Biswas, AA Golosov, editors. Approaching the Next Inflection in Peptide Therapeutics: Attaining Cell Permeability and Oral Bioavailability; ACS Publications; 2022. pp. 1–25. 10.1021/bk-2022-1417.ch001
19 You S, McIntyre G, Passioura T. The coming of age of cyclic peptide drugs: an update on discovery technologies. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2024; 19: 961-973.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
20 He J, Ghosh P, Nitsche C. Biocompatible strategies for peptide macrocyclisation. Chem Sci 2024; 15: 2300-2322.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 Rhodes CA, Pei D. Bicyclic peptides as next‐generation therapeutics. Chem Eur J 2017; 23: 12690-12703.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
22 Thombare VJ, Hutton CA. Bridged bicyclic peptides: structure and function. Pept Sci 2018; 110: e24057.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
23 Ahangarzadeh S, Kanafi MM, Hosseinzadeh S, Mokhtarzadeh A, Barati M, Ranjbari J, et al. Bicyclic peptides: types, synthesis and applications. Drug Discov Today 2019; 24: 1311-1319.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Feng D, Liu L, Shi Y, Du P, Xu S, Zhu Z, et al. Current development of bicyclic peptides. Chin Chem Lett 2023; 34: 108026.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
25 Heinis C, Winter G. Encoded libraries of chemically modified peptides. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2015; 26: 89-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
26 Bechtler C, Lamers C. Macrocyclization strategies for cyclic peptides and peptidomimetics. RSC Med Chem 2021; 12: 1325-1351.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Deyle K, Kong X-D, Heinis C. Phage selection of cyclic peptides for application in research and drug development. Acc Chem Res 2017; 50: 1866-1874.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Voss S, Rademann J, Nitsche C. Peptide–bismuth bicycles: in situ access to stable constrained peptides with superior bioactivity. Angew Chem Int Ed 2022; 61: e202113857.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
29 Voss S, Adair LD, Achazi K, Kim H, Bergemann S, Bartenschlager R, et al. Cell‐penetrating peptide‐bismuth bicycles. Angew Chem Int Ed 2024; 63: e202318615.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
30 Ullrich S, Somathilake U, Shang M, Nitsche C. Phage-encoded bismuth bicycles enable instant access to targeted bioactive peptides. Commun Chem 2024; 7: 143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
31 He R-N, Zhang M-J, Dai B, Kong X-D. Selection of peptide–bismuth bicycles using phage display. ACS Chem Biol 2024; 19: 1040-1044.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
32 Baba SP, Bhatnagar A. Role of thiols in oxidative stress. Curr Opin Toxicol 2018; 7: 133-139.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
33 Forman HJ, Zhang H, Rinna A. Glutathione: overview of its protective roles, measurement, and biosynthesis. Mol Asp Med 2009; 30: 1-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
34 Ge R, Sun H. Bioinorganic chemistry of bismuth and antimony: target sites of metallodrugs. Acc Chem Res 2007; 40: 267-274.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
35 Adeyemi JO, Onwudiwe DC. Chemistry and some biological potential of bismuth and antimony dithiocarbamate complexes. Molecules 2020; 25: 305.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
36 Sadler PJ, Sun H, Li H. Bismuth(III) complexes of the tripeptide glutathione. Chem Eur J 2006; 2: 701-708.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
37 Kepp KP. A quantitative scale of oxophilicity and thiophilicity. Inorg Chem 2016; 55: 9461-9470.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
38 Gonçalves Â, Matias M, Salvador JAR, Silvestre S. Bioactive bismuth compounds: Is their toxicity a barrier to therapeutic use? Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25: 1600.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
39 Tillman LA, Drake FM, Dixon JS, Wood JR. Safety of bismuth in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1996; 10: 459-467.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
40 Loos M, Gerber C, Corona F, Hollender J, Singer H. Accelerated isotope fine structure calculation using pruned transition trees. Anal Chem 2015; 87: 5738-5744.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |