UV-A and Simulated Sunlight Photo-activity of TiO2 Nanoparticles Formed from Titanate Nanotubes
Jeffrey S. Church A C , Keith Fincher A and Xingdong Wang BA Materials Science and Engineering, CSIRO, PO Box 21, Belmont, Geelong, Vic. 3216, Australia.
B School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: jeff.church@csiro.au
Australian Journal of Chemistry 63(2) 293-298 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09239
Submitted: 24 April 2009 Accepted: 21 June 2009 Published: 26 February 2010
Abstract
Sodium titanate nanotubes were prepared hydrothermally and sodium ions were exchanged for hydrogen ions by washing with water and further treatment with HCl. No anatase or rutile was produced during the exchange. Photo-catalysts were prepared by calcination and their activity was compared in UV-A and simulated sunlight by bleaching methyl orange, which does not adsorb onto the catalyst’s surface. Only photo-catalysts with low sodium content were capable of bleaching the dye. More photo-oxidation occurred in simulated sunlight suggesting that the dye is absorbing visible light and transferring this energy to the TiO2. The preparation of highly active photo-catalysts from sodium titanate nanotubes may well depend on optimizing their preparation to minimize sodium content without the formation of rutile.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering. The authors acknowledge the technical assistance of Joyce Mole, Colin Veitch, and Andrea Woodhead.
[1]
M. A. Fox,
M. Dulay,
Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 341.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |