Crystal Structures, Topological Analyses, and Magnetic Properties of Manganese-Dihydroxyterephthalate Complexes
Qiang Gao A , Fei-Long Jiang A B , Ming-Yan Wu A , You-Gui Huang A , Wei Wei A , Qing-Fu Zhang A and Mao-Chun Hong AA Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials Chemistry and Physics, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou 350002, China.
B Corresponding author. Email: fjiang@fjirsm.ac.cn
Australian Journal of Chemistry 63(2) 286-292 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09378
Submitted: 9 July 2009 Accepted: 3 September 2009 Published: 26 February 2010
Abstract
Two manganese(ii)-dihydroxyterephthalate complexes were obtained under solvothermal conditions: [Mn(H2dhtp)(H2O)2] n (1) and [Mn2(dhtp)(H2O)2] n (2) (H4dhtp = 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalate). The 3D framework of complex 1 is constructed by H2dhtp ligands joined to 1D carboxylate-bridged Mn(ii) chains, which features a (4,4)-connected PtS net. Complex 2 contains a novel inorganic honeycomb Mn(ii)–O layer, which is further connected into a 3D (4,8)-connected flu net by dhtp ligands. Magnetic measurements of 1 and 2 were performed in the range of 2–300 K and the results indicate that antiferromagnetic coupling exits in the manganese(ii) centres of both complexes.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by grants from 973 Program (2006CB932900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2007J0172).
[1]
(a) M. Eddaoudi,
J. Kim,
N. Rosi,
D. Vodka,
J. Wachter,
M. O’Keeffe,
O. M. Yaghi,
Science 2002, 295, 469.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
[13]
[14]
[15]