Over-Stabilization of Chemically Modified and Cross-Linked Candida antarctica Lipase B Using Various Epoxides and Diepoxides
Nemanja Miletić A and Katja Loos A BA Department of Polymer Chemistry, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
B Corresponding author. Email: k.u.loos@rug.nl
Australian Journal of Chemistry 62(8) 799-805 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09033
Submitted: 16 January 2009 Accepted: 24 February 2009 Published: 13 August 2009
Abstract
Candida antarctica lipase B, Cal-B, was (i) chemically modified with various epoxides, or (ii) cross-linked with various diepoxides in order to improve enzyme activity and thermal stability. Changed enzyme structure was confirmed by kinetic resolution of p-nitrophenol acetate with methanol and determination of the kinetic parameters. Thermal stability measurements were carried out for each Cal-B derivative, proving that Cal-B modified with 1,2-epoxypropane and 1,2-epoxypentane, and cross-linked with 1,2,7,8-diepoxyoctane and 1,2,9,10-diepoxydecane showed higher stability than soluble enzyme. The influence of the length of the epoxide arm in the modification process, as well as the length of the spacer arm in the cross-linking process, on the final enzyme preparation properties was investigated. The amount of epoxides and diepoxides used for structural rearrangement played an important role in the derivatives’ characteristics. The influence of the precipitant used and the presence of additives, such as surfactant or crown-ether, during modification and cross-linking processes was also revealed.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Petros Pechlivanoglou for improving the manuscript.
[1]
B. Krajewska,
Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2004, 35, 126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |