Kinetics and Mechanistic Study on the Reaction of Iodo(diethylenetriamine) Platinum(ii) with l-Cystine
Trilochan Swain A C and Prakash Mohanty BA Faculty of Chemistry, Indic Institute of Design and Research, Orissa, India.
B Department of Chemistry, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar-751 004, Orissa, India.
C Corresponding author. Email: scienceorissa@rediffmail.com
Australian Journal of Chemistry 62(5) 493-500 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH08192
Submitted: 5 May 2008 Accepted: 19 December 2008 Published: 15 May 2009
Abstract
Substitution reactions of the complex [Pt(dien)I]+, where dien = diethylenetriamine or 1,5-diamino-3-azapentane, with the sulfur-containing rescue agent l-cystine have been studied in a 1.0 × 10–1 mol dm–3 aqueous perchlorate medium at various temperatures (25–50°C) and pH (2.30–1.00) using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. The products were characterized by their infrared and 1H NMR data at various temperatures. These data indicate that [Pt(dien)I]+ formed a complex with l-cystine through Pt–S bonds at pH 1.00–2.30. This Pt–S bond is observed at 50°C with ring closure of the dien (δ 3.8–3.9, 2H, CH2) and with open-ring dien (δ 3.2, 3.6–3.8 (dien), 2H, CH2). All reactions follow the rate law –d[mixture]/dt = (k1 + k2[Nu])[PtII], where k2 denotes a second-order rate constant and [Nu] is the total concentration of nucleophile. The product formation rate constant and activation parameters Ea, ΔH#, and ΔS# have been determined.
Acknowledgement
The author (T.S.) thanks the Department of Chemistry, Utkal University, for providing support for the present research.
[1]
M. J. Cleare,
J. D. Hoeschele,
Bioinorg. Chem. 1973, 2, 187.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |