Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > BT > BT07222
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 56(8)

Embryology of the dioecious Australian endemic Lomandra longifolia (Lomandraceae)

Nabil M. Ahmad A , Peter M. Martin A B and John M. Vella A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Amenity Horticulture Unit, University of Sydney Plant Breeding Institute, PMB 11, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: pmartin@camden.usyd.edu.au

Australian Journal of Botany 56(8) 651-665 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT07222
Submitted: 17 December 2007  Accepted: 30 October 2008   Published: 15 December 2008

Abstract

Microsporogenesis, embryogeny and endosperm development of Lomandra longifolia Labill. are described in detail. The formation of the anther wall is the basic type composed of four cell layers, namely an epidermis, an endothecium, one middle layer and a tapetum. The tapetum layer has glandular, uninucleate cells. Successive cytokinesis follows meiosis, subsequently forming a tetrahedral tetrad of microspores. The ovule in each carpel is hemitropous, crassinucellate and bitegmic, with the micropyle formed by the inner integument. The archesporial cell divides periclinally to form the primary parietal and primary sporogenous cells. The sporogenous cell functions as the megaspore mother cell, whereas the parietal cell divides to give rise to two parietal layers. The mature megagametophyte, which has enlarged synergids and antipodals, is of the Polygonum type, with the normal complement of seven cells and eight nuclei. Nucellar tissue in the mature ovule consists of enlarged dermal cells and irregular subdermal cells surrounding a central strand of markedly smaller cells. Endosperm development is of the nuclear type. Embryo development is of the Graminad type, characterised by oblique zygotic and early pro-embryonic divisions.


Acknowledgements

We express our deep gratitude to Dr Jane Radford, manager of the Histopathology Laboratory at the University of Sydney, for permission to work in her laboratory and for her help on numerous practical matters. Thanks are also due to Professor R. A. McIntosh and Miss Alexandra Freebairn for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript. Finally we thank Leppington Speedy® Seedlings Pty Ltd for the provision of plant material and financial support.


References


APG (1998) An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85, 531–553.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [verified 22 August 2008].

Batygina TB (1969) On the possibility of a new type of embryogenesis in angiosperms. Revue de Cytology et de Biologie Vegetales 32, 335–341. open url image1

Bedford DJ, Lee AT, MacFarlane TD, Henderson RF, George AS (1986) Xanthorrhoeaceae. Flora of Australia 46, 88–171. open url image1

Bentham G (1878) ‘Flora Australiensis: a description of the plants of the Australian Territory. Vol. VII.’ (L. Reeve & Co.: London)

Bentham G , Hooker JD (1880) ‘Genera Plantarum. Vol III.’ (Lovell Reeve & Co.: London)

Bouman F (1984) The ovule. In ‘Embryology of angiosperms’. (Ed. BM Johri) pp. 123–157. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)

Brummitt RK (1992) ‘Vascular plant families and genera.’ (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew: London)

Cronquist A (1981) ‘An integrated system of classification of flowering plants.’ (Columbia University Press: New York)

Czapik R (1974) Embryology of five species of the Arabis hirsuta complex. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series; Botanica 27, 13–25. open url image1

Czapik R , Izmailow R (2001) Zygotic embryogenesis, structural aspects. In ‘Current trends in the embryology of angiosperms’. (Eds SS Bhojwani, WY Soh) pp. 197–222. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Dahlgren RM , Clifford HT , Yeo PF (1985) ‘The families of the monocotyledons.’ (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)

Davis GL (1966) ‘Systematic embryology of the angiosperms.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York)

Erdelska O (1997) Structural aspects of fertilization and embryogenesis in angiosperms. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Biologica 41, 49–66. open url image1

Jensen WA (1968) Cotton embryogenesis. The zygote. Planta 79, 346–366.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jensen WA (1972) ‘The embryo sac and fertilization in angiosperms. Harold L Lyon Arboretum Lecture Number Three.’ (University of Hawaii: Honolulu)

Jensen WA, Fisher DB (1968) Cotton embryogenesis: the entrance and discharge of the pollen tube in the embryo sac. Planta 78, 158–193.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Krause K (1930) Liliaceae. In ‘Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien’. 2nd edn. 15a. (Eds A Engler, K Prantl) pp. 227–386 (Engelmann: Leipzig, Germany)

Lee AL, Macfarlane TD (1986) Lomandra. Flora of Australia 46, 100–141. open url image1

Linskens HF (1968) Egg-sperm interaction in higher plants. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 104, 47–60. open url image1

McLean RC , Ivimey-Cook RW (1956) ‘Textbook of theoretical botany. Vol. II.’ (Longmans, Green & Co: London)

Natesh S , Rau MA (1984) The embryo. In ‘Embryology of angiosperms’. (Ed. BM Johri) (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)

Norstog K (1972) Early development of the barley embryo: fine structure. American Journal of Botany 59, 123–132.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Poddubnaya-Arnoldi VA (1967) Comparative embryology of the Orchidaceae. Phytomorphology 17, 312–320. open url image1

Pollock EG, Jensen WA (1964) Cell development during early embryogenesis in Capsella and Gossypium. American Journal of Botany 51, 915–921.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rudall P (1994) The ovule and embryo sac in Xanthorrhoeaceae sensu lato. Flora 189, 335–351. open url image1

Rudall P, Chase MW (1996) Systematics of Xanthorrhoeaceae sensu lato: evidence for polyphyly. Telopea 6, 629–647. open url image1

Russell SD (1979) Fine structure of megagametophyte development in Zea mays. Canadian Journal of Botany 57, 1093–1110.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ruzin SE (1999) ‘Plant microtechnique and microscopy.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Sass JE (1958) ‘Botanical microtechnique.’ 3rd edn. (The Iowa State University Press: Ames, IO)

Schnarf K, Wunderlich R (1939) Zur vergleichenden Embryologie der Liliaceae–Asphodeloideae. Flora 133, 297–327. open url image1

van Went JL (1970) The ultrastructure of the fertilized embryo sac of Petunia. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 19, 468–480. open url image1