Casuarina ecology: factors limiting cone production in the drooping sheoak, Allocasuarina verticillata
Tamra F. Chapman A B and David C. Paton AA Discipline of Environmental Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia. Email: tamra.chapman@dec.wa.gov.au
Australian Journal of Botany 55(2) 171-177 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT06089
Submitted: 1 May 2006 Accepted: 20 November 2006 Published: 16 March 2007
Abstract
Allocasuarina verticillata is an important species for biodiversity conservation on Kangaroo Island (South Australia) because it is the primary food source for the endangered glossy black-cockatoo, Calyptorhynchus lathami halmaturinus. Two potentially limiting factors, pollen and soil nutrients, were studied in the context of A. verticillata as foraging habitat for glossy black-cockatoos. Cone production was not limited by the amount of pollen available to female plants. The soils on which A. verticillata occurs on Kangaroo Island were low in nutrients. Available N, P and K were significantly increased via the application of slow-release fertiliser and the added nutrients resulted in a corresponding increase in the productivity of A. verticillata. The additional nutrients increased the number of cones produced on female branches, branch growth and potentially therefore, tree size. Since cone profitability appears to increase with tree size, the additional growth may also result in greater cone profitability in the long term. Adding slow-release fertiliser to small female A. verticillata trees and revegetation on sites with higher concentrations of soil nutrients would benefit the cockatoos. This is because other studies have shown that the cockatoos increase their foraging efficiency by cropping cones from large trees with greater cone profitability and branches with high densities of cones.
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted as part of the glossy black-cockatoo recovery program and was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Research Award. Additional support came from the Australian Research Council, the Wildlife Conservation Fund, the South Australian National Parks Foundation and the Save the Bush Fund. Gabriel Crowley assisted with the development of seed and soil measures and with the interpretation of the results. The many people who assisted with fieldwork are listed in Chapman (2005). We used the laboratory facilities and administrative services of the Discipline of Environmental Biology at the University of Adelaide and at the Species and Communities Branch of the Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, to carry out this project. Two anonymous referees improved the paper via constructive criticism.
Cameron M, Cunningham RB
(2006) Habitat selection at multiple spatial scales by foraging glossy black-cockatoos. Austral Ecology 31, 597–607.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman TF, Paton DC
(2006) Aspects of drooping sheoaks (Allocasuarina verticillata) that influence glossy black-cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami halmaturinus) foraging on Kangaroo Island. Emu 106, 163–168.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cleland JB, Sims EB
(1968) Food of the glossy black cockatoo. South Australian Ornithologist 25, 47–52.
Crowley GM, Garnett ST
(2001) Food value and tree selection by glossy black-cockatoos Calyptorhynchus lathami. Austral Ecology 26, 116–126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Flores EM, Moseley MF
(1982) The anatomy of the pistillate inflorescence and flower of Casuarina verticillata Lamarck (Casuarinaceae). American Journal of Botany 69, 1673–1684.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freeman DC,
Klikoff LG, Harper KT
(1976) Differential resource utilisation by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193, 597–599.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Houssard C,
Thompson JD, Escarre J
(1994) Do sex-related differences in response to environmental variation influence the sex-ratio in the dioecious Rumex acetosella? Oikos 70, 80–90.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kershaw AP
(1970) Pollen morphological variation within the Casuarinaceae. Pollen et Spores 12, 145–161.
Lloyd D
(1965) Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 195, 3–134.
Mathews GM
(1912) A reference-list to the birds of Australia. Novitates Zoologicae 18, 171–446.
Moncur MW,
Boland DJ, Harbard JL
(1997) Aspects of the floral biology of Allocasuarina verticillata (Casuarinaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 45, 857–869.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pepper JW,
Male TD, Roberts GE
(2000) Foraging ecology of the South Australian glossy black-cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami halmaturinus). Austral Ecology 25, 16–24.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephenson AG
(1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12, 253–279.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sutherland S
(1986) Patterns of fruit set: what controls fruit-flower ratios in plants? Evolution 40, 117–128.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vaughton G
(1991) Variation between years in pollen and nutrient limitation of fruit-set in Banksia spinulosa. Journal of Ecology 78, 389–400.