Reproductive allometry in four annual weeds
A. C. Guglielmini A D , A. M. C. Verdú B and E. H. Satorre CA Cátedra de Cerealicultura, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
B Escola Superior d’Agricultura de Barcelona, Departament d’Enginyeria Agroalimentària i Biotecnologia, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain.
C Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas con la Agricultura (IFEVA)- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-(CONICET), Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
D Corresponding author. Email: guglielm@agro.uba.ar
Australian Journal of Botany 67(2) 99-105 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT18087
Submitted: 24 April 2018 Accepted: 21 February 2019 Published: 8 April 2019
Abstract
Differences in plant biomass/plant seed production relationship imply that plants suppressed by competition to the same extent, may not suffer the same reduction in seed number setting. This size-dependent process evidenced by the quantitative relationship between plant growth and allocation to reproductive structures can be considered from an allometric perspective. The aim of this study was to describe the reproductive allometry of four annual weed species of the Pampas cropping systems by modelling the plant biomass/plant seed production relationship in Digitaria sanguinalis, Amaranthus hybridus, Setaria verticillata and Chenopodium album. To achieve this goal, two experiments developed during two consecutive growing periods (Experiments 1 and 2) were set up under greenhouse conditions. Weed species were grown in monocultures and in binary mixtures, with each other and with soybean crop, to obtain plants of different size after the effect of intra and interspecific competition. Data per plant regarding biomass versus seed number production considering monocultures and mixtures from Experiments 1 and 2 were analysed for each species using linear regression. Parameters of the linear functions fitted for C. album, S. verticillata and D. sanguinalis did not differ between experiments and data were pooled. Thus, three single specific models were obtained with the same intercept of zero (y-axis intercept when x = 0 was zero) and different slopes, 1122, 69 and 130 seeds g plant biomass–1 respectively. In the case of A. hybridus, the slopes were different in Experiments 1 (123 seeds g plant biomass–1) and 2 (74 seeds g plant biomass–1). Moreover, reproductive allocation changed allometrically under highly competitive stress since small plants failed to set seeds, unless a plant biomass threshold was attained (x-axis intercept when y = 0 was positive). Besides the ecological interpretation in reproductive output, implications in weed management are considered.
Additional keywords: allometric growth, biomass allocation, competition, partitioning, reproductive allocation, weeds.
References
Aarssen LW (2005) On size, fecundity, and fitness in competing plants. In ‘Reproductive allocation in plants’. (Eds EG Reekie, FA Bazzaz) pp. 215–244. (Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA)Aarssen LW, Clauss MJ (1992) Genotypic variation in fecundity allocation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Ecology 80, 109–114.
| Genotypic variation in fecundity allocation in Arabidopsis thaliana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aarssen LW, Keogh T (2002) Conundrums of competitive ability: what to measure? Oikos 96, 531–542.
| Conundrums of competitive ability: what to measure?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aarssen LW, Taylor DR (1992) Fecundity allocation in herbaceous plants. Oikos 65, 225–232.
| Fecundity allocation in herbaceous plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Ghersa CM, Sánchez RA (1987) demography of Datura ferox L. in soybean crops. Weed Research 27, 91–102.
| demography of Datura ferox L. in soybean crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baraibar B, Canadell C, Torra J, Royo-Esnal A, Recasens J (2017) Weed seed fate during summer fallow: the importance of seed predation and seed burial. Weed Science 65, 515–524.
Benvenuti S (2007) Weed seed movement and dispersal strategies in the agricultural environment. Weed Biology and Management 7, 141–157.
| Weed seed movement and dispersal strategies in the agricultural environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bonser SP, Aarssen LW (2009) Interpreting reproductive allometry: individual strategies of allocation explain size dependent reproduction in plant populations. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 11, 31–40.
| Interpreting reproductive allometry: individual strategies of allocation explain size dependent reproduction in plant populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Charles-Edwards DA (1984) On the ordered development of plants. I. An hypothesis. Annals of Botany 53, 699–707.
| On the ordered development of plants. I. An hypothesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de la Fuente EB, Suárez SA, Ghersa CM (2006) Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the rolling pampas (Argentina). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 115, 229–236.
| Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the rolling pampas (Argentina).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, González L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2018) InfoStat. Versión 2018. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. Available at: http://www.infostat.com.ar (accessed 6 March 2019)
Gaudet CL, Keddy PA (1988) A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334, 242–243.
| A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ghersa CM, León RJC (1999) Successional changes in the agroecosystems of the rolling pampas. In ‘Ecosystems of the world. Ecosystems of disturbed ground’. (Ed. R Walker) pp. 487–502. (Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
Ghersa CM, Martinez-Ghersa MA (2000) Ecological correlates of weed seed size and persistence in the soil under different tilling systems: implications for weed management. Field Crops Research 67, 141–148.
| Ecological correlates of weed seed size and persistence in the soil under different tilling systems: implications for weed management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grundy AC, Mead A, Burston S, Overs T (2004) Seed production of Chenopodium album in competition with field vegetables. Weed Research 44, 271–281.
| Seed production of Chenopodium album in competition with field vegetables.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Guglielmini AC, Verdú AMC, Satorre EH (2017) Competitive ability of five common weed species in competition with soybean. International Journal of Pest Management 63, 30–36.
| Competitive ability of five common weed species in competition with soybean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harper JL (1977) ‘Population biology of plants.’ (Academic Press: London)
Karlsson PS, Méndez M (2005) The resource economy of plant reproduction. In ‘Reproductive allocation in plants’. (Eds EG Reekie, FA Bazzaz) pp. 3–49. (Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA)
Neytcheva MS, Aarssen LW (2008) More plant biomass results in more offspring production in annuals, or does it? Oikos 117, 1298–1307.
| More plant biomass results in more offspring production in annuals, or does it?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Norris FR (2007) Weed fecundity: current status and future needs. Crop Protection 26, 182–188.
| Weed fecundity: current status and future needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Obeso JR (2002) The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist 155, 321–348.
| The costs of reproduction in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oerke EC, Dehne HW (2004) Safeguarding production losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Protection 23, 275–285.
| Safeguarding production losses in major crops and the role of crop protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Penning de Vries FWT, Brunsting AHM, Van Laar HH (1974) Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology 45, 339–377.
| Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Poggio SL, Ghersa CM (2011) Species richness and evenness as a function of biomass in arable plant communities. Weed Research 51, 241–249.
| Species richness and evenness as a function of biomass in arable plant communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Prihar SS, Stewart BA (1991) Sorghum harvest index in relation to plant size, environment, and cultivar. Agronomy Journal 83, 603–608.
| Sorghum harvest index in relation to plant size, environment, and cultivar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Puricelli E, Tuesca D (2005) Weed density and diversity under glyphosate-resistant crop sequences. Crop Protection 24, 533–542.
| Weed density and diversity under glyphosate-resistant crop sequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rees M, Crawley MJ (1989) Growth, reproduction and population dynamics. Functional Ecology 3, 645–653.
| Growth, reproduction and population dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Samson DA, Werk KS (1986) Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants. American Naturalist 127, 667–680.
| Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schmid B, Weiner J (1993) Plastic relationships between reproductive and vegetative mass in Solidago altissima. Evolution 47, 61–74.
| Plastic relationships between reproductive and vegetative mass in Solidago altissima.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28568110PubMed |
Schmid B, Bazzaz FA, Weiner J (1995) Size dependency of sexual reproduction and of clonal growth in two perennial plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 73, 1831–1837.
| Size dependency of sexual reproduction and of clonal growth in two perennial plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shipley B, Dion J (1992) The allometry of seed production in herbaceous angiosperms. American Naturalist 139, 467–483.
| The allometry of seed production in herbaceous angiosperms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sugiyama S, Bazzaz FA (1998) Size dependence of reproductive allocation: the influence of resource availability, competition and genetic identity. Functional Ecology 12, 280–288.
| Size dependence of reproductive allocation: the influence of resource availability, competition and genetic identity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swanton CJ, Huang JZ, Deen W, Tollenaar M, Shrestha A, Rahimian H (1999) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on Setaria viridis. Weed Science 47, 446–453.
Tracey AJ, Aarssen LW (2011) Competition and body size in plants: the between-species trade-off in maximum potential versus minimum reproductive threshold size. Journal of Plant Ecology 4, 115–122.
| Competition and body size in plants: the between-species trade-off in maximum potential versus minimum reproductive threshold size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vega CRC, Sadras VO, Andrade FH, Uhart SA (2000) Reproductive allometry in soybean, maize and sunflower. Annals of Botany 85, 461–468.
| Reproductive allometry in soybean, maize and sunflower.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vega CRC, Andrade FH, Sadras VO (2001) Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiency in soybean, sunflower and maize. Field Crops Research 72, 163–175.
| Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiency in soybean, sunflower and maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vitta JI, Tuesca D, Puricelli E (2004) Widespread use of glyphosate tolerant soybean and weed community richness in Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 103, 621–624.
| Widespread use of glyphosate tolerant soybean and weed community richness in Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waite S, Hutchings MJ (1982) Plastic energy allocation patterns in Plantago coronopus. Oikos 38, 333–342.
| Plastic energy allocation patterns in Plantago coronopus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weiner J (2004) Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6, 207–215.
| Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhong Huang J, Shrestha AS, Tollenaar M, Deen W, Rahimian H, Swanton CJ (2001) Effect of temperature and photoperiod on the phenological development of common lambsquarters. Weed Science 49, 500–508.
| Effect of temperature and photoperiod on the phenological development of common lambsquarters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zimdahl RL (2007) Weeds – the beginning. In ‘Fundamentals of weed science’. 3rd edn. pp. 15–39. (Elsevier Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA)
