Contrasting ecotypic differentiation for growth and survival in Pinus canariensis
Rosana López A , Ami Zehavi B , José Climent C D and Luis Gil AA U. D. Anatomía, Fisiología y Genética vegetal. ETSI Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid 28040, Spain.
B KKL Forest Department, Eshtaol, 99775, Israel.
C CIFOR. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Ctra, A Coruña km 7.5, Madrid 28040, Spain.
D Corresponding author. Email: climent@inia.es
Australian Journal of Botany 55(7) 759-769 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT07016
Submitted: 1 February 2007 Accepted: 10 July 2007 Published: 15 November 2007
Abstract
We tested genetic and environmental effects and their interaction on the behaviour of 21 provenances of Pinus canariensis Chr. Sm. Ex DC from the Canary Islands and three seed sources from Israel at seven study sites covering a wide range of ecological conditions. Survival and growth traits (height, diameter and polycyclism) and their relationship with environmental parameters were assessed to evaluate their adaptive value and establish patterns of variation of the species inside and outside its natural distribution area. The results showed a high level of ecotypic differentiation for survival. As a general pattern, seed sources from favourable environments exhibited lower survival rates at dry sites than those from harsh environments (r = –0.76, P < 0.05, between survival and site index at the seed source). By contrast, growth traits presented a high phenotypic plasticity, scarce differentiation among seed sources and a negligible genotype × environment interaction. With few exceptions, local provenances from the Canary Islands did not stand out for survival or growth when compared with the rest at each trial site, whereas local seed sources from Israel were among the best growing and survived better at the experimental sites in this country. Therefore, the possibility of a locally adapted land race in Israel is discussed. We also discuss the low geographic differentiation for growth in the Canary Islands pine in the light of the current knowledge of the species’ life history and the potential use of this species in reforestation programs in semi-arid environments.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Canary Islands Government (Viceconsejería de Medio Ambiente) and the Cabildos of Tenerife and Gran Canaria. We especially thank all people involved in the plantation and measurements of both trials. Rosana López holds a fellowship of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science. José Climent was supported by a ‘Ramón y Cajal’ Fellowship.
Aboal JR,
Jimenez MS,
Morales D, Gil P
(2000) Effects of thinning on throughfall in Canary Islands pine forest—the role of fog. Journal of Hydrology 238, 218–230.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Alía R,
Gil L, Pardos JA
(1995) Performance of 43 Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances on 5 locations in central Spain. Silvae Genetica 44, 75–81.
Alía R,
Moro J, Denis JB
(1997) Performance of Pinus pinaster provenances in Spain: interpretation of the genotype by environment interaction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27, 1548–1559.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Allen HL, Wentworth TR
(1993) Vegetation control and site preparation affect patterns of shoot elongation for 3-year-old loblolly-pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23, 2110–2115.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arévalo JR, Fernández-Palacios JM
(2005) From pine plantations to natural stands. Ecological restoration of a Pinus canariensis Sweet ex Spreng forest. Plant Ecology 181, 217–226.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Atzmon N,
Moshe Y, Schiller G
(2004) Ecophysiological response to severe drought in Pinus halepensis Mill. trees of two provenances. Plant Ecology 171, 15–22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Awada T,
Radoglou K,
Fotelli MN, Constantinidou HIA
(2003) Ecophysiology of seedlings of three Mediterranean pine species in contrasting light regimes. Tree Physiology 23, 33–41.
| PubMed |
Bloom AJ,
Chapin FS, Mooney HA
(1985) Resource limitation in plants—an economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 363–392.
Bongarten BC, Teskey RO
(1987) Dry weight partitioning and its relationship to productivity in loblolly pine seedlings from seven sources. Forest Science 33, 255–267.
Bradshaw AD
(1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13, 115–155.
Chambel MR,
Climent J,
Alía R, Valladares F
(2005) Phenotypic plasticity: a useful framework for understanding adaptation in forest species. Investiación Agraria Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 14, 334–344.
Climent J,
Chambel MR,
Gil L, Pardos JA
(2003) Vertical heartwood variation patterns and prediction of heartwood volume in Pinus canariensis Sm. Forest Ecology and Management 174, 203–211.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Climent J,
Chambel MR,
Pérez E,
Gil L, Pardos JA
(2002a) Relationship between heartwood radius and early radial growth, tree age, and climate in Pinus canariensis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 103–111.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Climent J,
Chambel MR,
López R,
Mutke S,
Alía R, Gil L
(2006) Population divergence for heteroblasty in the Canary Island pine (Pinus canariensis, Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 93, 840–848.
Climent J,
Gil L, Pardos JA
(1998) Xylem anatomical traits related to resinous heartwood formation in Pinus canariensis Sm. Trees—Structure and Function 12, 139–145.
Climent J,
Gil L,
Pérez E, Pardos JA
(2002b) Efecto de la procedencia en la supervivencia de plántulas de Pinus canariensis Sm. en medio árido. Investiación Agraria Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 11, 171–180.
Climent J,
Tapias R,
Pardos JA, Gil L
(2004) Fire adaptations in the Canary Islands pine (Pinus canariensis). Plant Ecology 171, 185–196.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Court-Picon M,
Gadbin-Henry C,
Guibal F, Roux M
(2004) Dendrometry and morphometry of Pinus pinea L. in Lower Provence (France): adaptability and variability of provenances. Forest Ecology and Management 194, 319–333.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cregg BM
(1994) Carbon allocation, gas exchange, and needle morphology of Pinus ponderosa genotypes known to differ in growth and survival under imposed drought. Tree Physiology 14, 883–898.
| PubMed |
Dejong G
(1990) Quantitative genetics of reaction norms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 3, 447–468.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eriksson G,
Jonsson A,
Dormling I,
Norell L, Stener LG
(1993) Retrospective early tests of Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings grown under five nutrient regimes. Forest Science 39, 95–117.
Gieger T, Leuschner C
(2004) Altitudinal change in needle water relations of Pinus canariensis and possible evidence of a drought-induced alpine timberline on Mt. Teide, Tenerife. Flora 199, 100–109.
Gil L,
Climent J,
Nanos N,
Mutke S,
Ortiz I, Schiller G
(2002) Cone morphology variation in Pinus canariensis Sm. Plant Systematics and Evolution 235, 35–51.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gómez A,
González-Martínez SC,
Collada C,
Climent J, Gil L
(2003) Complex population genetic structure in the endemic Canary Island pine revealed using chloroplast microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107, 1123–1131.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
González-Martínez SC,
Alía R, Gil L
(2002) Population genetic structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): a comparison of allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Heredity 89, 199–206.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
González-Martínez SC,
Mariette S,
Ribeiro MM,
Burban C,
Raffin A,
Chambel MR,
Ribeiro CAM,
Aguiar A,
Plomion C,
Alía R,
Gil L,
Vendramin GG, Kremer A
(2004) Genetic resources in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton): molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation and differentiation among maternal lineages. Forest Ecology and Management 197, 103–115.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Isik F,
Isik K,
Yildirim T, Li BL
(2002) Annual shoot growth components related to growth of Pinus brutia. Tree Physiology 22, 51–58.
| PubMed |
Johnsen O, Skroppa T
(1996) Adaptive properties of Picea abies progenies are influenced by environmental signals during sexual reproduction. Euphytica 92, 67–71.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klaus W
(1989) Mediterranean pines and their history. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162, 133–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Korol L,
Gil L,
Climent J,
Zehavi A, Schiller G
(1999) Canary islands pine (Pinus canariensis Chr. Sm. ex DC) 2. Gene flow among native populations. Forest Genetics 6, 277–282.
Lal M,
Harasawa H, Takahashi K
(2002) Future climate change and its impacts over small island states. Climate Research 19, 179–192.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lascoux M,
Kang H, Lundkvist K
(1994) Growth of 24 full-sib families of Pinus sylvestris L. at 6 relative nutrient addition rates. II. Relation between growth components. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9, 115–123.
Lopez GA,
Potts BM,
Dutkowski GW, Traverso JMR
(2001) Quantitative genetics of Eucalyptus globulus: affinities of land race and native stand localities. Silvae Genetica 50, 244–252.
Lopez GA,
Potts BM,
Vaillancourt RE, Apiolaza LA
(2003) Maternal and carryover effects on early growth of Eucalyptus globulus. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33, 2108–2115.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lortie CJ, Aarssen LW
(1996) The specialization hypothesis for phenotypic plasticity in plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences 157, 484–487.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matheson AC, Cotterill PP
(1990) Utility of genotype × environment interactions. Forest Ecology and Management 30, 159–174.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mátyás C
(1994) Modelling climate change effects with provenance test data. Tree Physiology 14, 797–804.
| PubMed |
Mutke S,
Gordo J,
Climent J, Gil L
(2003) Shoot growth and phenology modelling of grafted Stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) in Inner Spain. Annals of Forest Science 60, 527–537.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mutke S,
Gordo J, Gil L
(2005) Variability of Mediterranean stone pine cone production: yield loss as response to climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 132, 263–272.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Navascues M,
Vaxevanidou Z,
González-Martínez SC,
Climent J,
Gil L, Emerson BC
(2006) Chloroplast microsatellites reveal colonization and metapopulation dynamics in the Canary Island pine. Molecular Ecology 15, 2691–2698.
| PubMed |
Pardos M,
Climent J,
Gil L, Pardos JA
(2003) Shoot growth components and flowering in grafted Pinus halepensis Mill. Trees—Structure and Function 17, 442–450.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Petit RJ, Hampe A
(2006) Some evolutionary consequences of being a tree. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 37, 187–214.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinyopusarerk K,
Doran JC,
Williams ER, Wasuwanich P
(1996) Variation in growth of Eucalyptus camaldulensis provenances in Thailand. Forest Ecology and Management 87, 63–73.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Prasad NS, Dieter MJ
(1998) Genetic control of growth and form in early-age tests of Casuarina equisetifolia in Andhra Pradesh, India. Forest Ecology and Management 110, 49–58.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rebetez M, Dobbertin M
(2004) Climate change may already threaten Scots pine stands in the Swiss Alps. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 79, 1–9.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rehfeldt GE, Gallo LA
(2001) Introduction of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir to Argentina. Using quantitative traits for retrospective identification and prospective selection of provenances. New Forests 21, 35–44.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rehfeldt GE,
Tchebakova NM,
Parfenova YI,
Wykoff WR,
Kuzmina NA, Milyutin LI
(2002) Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris. Global Change Biology 8, 912–929.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rehfeldt GE,
Ying CC,
Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton DA
(1999) Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: niche breath, climate change, and reforestation. Ecological Monographs 69, 375–407.
Sáenz-Romero C,
Guzmán-Reyna R, Rehfeldt GE
(2006) Altitudinal genetic variation among Pinus oocarpa populations in Michoacán, Mexico. Implications for seed zoning, conservation, tree breeding and global warming. Forest Ecology and Management 229, 340–350.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schlichting CD
(1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17, 667–693.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schmidtling RC
(1994) Use of provenance tests to predict response to climate change: Loblolly pine and Norway spruce. Tree Physiology 14, 805–817.
| PubMed |
Sperling FN,
Washington R, Whittaker RJ
(2004) Future climate change of the subtropical North Atlantic: implications for the cloud forests of Tenerife. Climatic Change 65, 103–123.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sultan SE
(2000a) Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life-history. Trends in Plants Science 5, 537–542.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sultan SE
(2000b) Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in polygonum species of contrasting ecological breath. Ecology 82, 328–343.
Vaxevanidou Z,
González-Martínez SC,
Climent J, Gil L
(2006) Tree populations: bordering on extinction: a study case in the endemic Canary Islands pine. Biological Conservation 129, 451–460.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wells C, Pigliucci M
(2000) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: the case of heterophylly in aquatic plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3, 1–18.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |