Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Seed-bank dynamics of Eleocharis: can spatial and temporal variability explain habitat segregation?

Dorothy M. Bell and Peter J. Clarke

Australian Journal of Botany 52(1) 119 - 131
Published: 17 February 2004

Abstract

Four Eleocharis species exhibit habitat partitioning in both extant vegetation and in the soil seed bank of upland temporary wetlands on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales. Explanations for this partitioning were sought in seed-bank dynamics at three shore levels in two wetlands. Habitat partitioning (zonation) was explained in part by seedling recruitment but not by either persistence of seeds in the soil or by dormancy patterns. All four species recruited at wetland edges but only the deepwater species, Eleocharis sphacelata, recruited in deeper water. Viability of buried seeds was consistently high and species had very low decay rates and half-lives greater than 50 years. Two types of dormancy patterns with burial were shown. Most seeds of Eleocharis sphacelata and E. pusilla were non-dormant after a 3-month burial, whereas for E. acuta and E. dietrichiana seed germination percentages gradually increased over a number of years. These two dormancy patterns may contribute to coexistence, since coexistence is enhanced by a long-lived resistant phase in the life history of species and by temporal variability in germination. There were also spatial inconsistencies in patterns of dormant fractions. Burial in the deeper zones of the marsh-like Billybung Lagoon had an inhibitory effect both on germinability and on germination rates of E. acuta and E. dietrichiana seeds. All but E. acuta showed some degree of seasonal dormancy, but this pattern was also not consistent in space. Explanations for zonation should concentrate on other life-history phases, such as dispersal and seedling survival.

https://doi.org/10.1071/BT03024

© CSIRO 2004

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions