Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA07412 > Fulltext
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 48(9)

Using automated supplementation systems to meet growth targets for grazing sheep

M. K. Bowen A C D , P. M. Pepper B , J. L. Winkleman A , R. C. McPhie A and M. R. Winter A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PO Box 519, Longreach, Qld 4730, Australia.

B Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Locked Mail Bag 4, Moorooka, Qld 4105, Australia.

C Present address: Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PO Box 6014, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Qld 4702, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: maree.bowen@dpi.qld.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(9) 1201-1209 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07412
Submitted: 17 December 2007  Accepted: 18 May 2008   Published: 7 August 2008

Abstract

Remote drafting technology now available for sheep allows targeted supplementation of individuals within a grazing flock. This paper reports results of three experiments. Experiment 1 examined the weight change of Merino wethers allowed access to either lupin grain or whole cottonseed 0, 1, 2 or 7 days/week for 6 weeks. Experiment 2 examined the weight change of Merino wethers allowed access to either lupins or a sorghum + cottonseed meal (CSM) supplement 0, 2, 4 or 7 days/week for 8 weeks. Experiment 3 investigated the relationship between five allocations of trough space at the supplement self-feeders (5–50 cm/sheep) and the weight change of Merino wethers allowed access to lupins 1 day/week for 8 weeks. In all experiments, the Merino wethers had free access as a single group to drinking water and low quality hay in a large group pen and were allowed access to supplement once per day on their scheduled days of access. No water was available in the areas containing supplement, but one-way flow gates allowed animals to return to the group pen in their own time.

There was a linear response in growth rate to increased frequency of access to lupins in Experiments 1 and 2, with each additional day of access increasing liveweight gain by 26 and 21 g/day, respectively. Similarly, the response to the sorghum + CSM supplement was linear, although significantly lower (P < 0.05), at 12 g/day. Providing access to whole cottonseed resulted in no significant change in growth rate compared with the control animals. In Experiment 3, decreasing trough space from 50 to 5 cm/sheep had no effect on sheep liveweight change.

It was concluded that the relationships developed here, for growth response to increased frequency of access to lupins or a sorghum + CSM supplement, could be used to indicate the most appropriate frequency of access to supplement, through a remote drafting unit, to achieve sheep weight change targets. Also, that a trough space of 5 cm/sheep appears adequate in this supplementation system.

Additional keywords: precision nutrition, rangeland.


Acknowledgements

These experiments were funded by the Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre with in-kind contributions from the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland (DPI&F). We are grateful to Peter Martin, Adam Pytko and Madeleine Modina of the Health and Nutritional Biochemistry Laboratory of DPI&F for conducting laboratory analyses.


References


AFRC (1993) ‘Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on the responses to nutrients.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

AOAC (1975) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC)

Beaty JL, Cochran RC, Lintzenich BA, Vanzant ES, Morrill JL, Brandt RT, Johnson DE (1994) Effect of frequency of supplementation and protein concentration in supplements on performance and digestion characteristics of beef cattle consuming low-quality forages. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2475–2486.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Beeson WM, Perry TW, Mohler M (1957) Self-feeding free choice vs. self-feeding a complete mixture for fattening steers. Journal of Animal Science 16, 787–795. open url image1

Bell AK, Shands CG, Hegarty RS (2002) ‘Grain finishing of lambs.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: North Sydney, NSW)

Bird SH, Dicko M (1987) Cottonseed supplements for sheep. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 9, 80–88. open url image1

Bohnert DW, Schauer CS, DelCurto T (2002) Influence of rumen protein degradability and supplementation frequency on performance and nitrogen use in ruminants consuming low-quality forage: cow performance and efficiency of nitrogen use in wethers. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1629–1637.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Bowen MK, Pepper PM, Patterson E, McConnel I, Jordan D (2007a) Growth and carcass characteristics of cast-for-age Merino ewes fed sorghum-based feedlot diets. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1309–1316.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bowen MK, Pepper PM, Winkleman J, McConnel I (2007b) Concentrates based on sorghum grain provide a basis for a finishing system for crossbred lambs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1317–1325.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Bowen MK, Pepper PM, Winkleman JL, Rowe JB (2007c) Automated feeding systems for grazing sheep: how does frequency of access affect rate of weight change? Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 16, 229–234. open url image1

Bowman JGP, Sowell BF (1997) Delivery method and supplement consumption by grazing ruminants: a review. Journal of Animal Science 75, 543–550.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Davis J (2003) ‘Feedlotting lambs. A producer’s guide.’ (Department of Primary Industries: Rutherglen, Vic.)

Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (2006) Livestock nutrition, supplementary feeding of sheep using cottonseed, DPI&F Note. (Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries: Brisbane, Qld) Available at http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/sheep/8091.html [Verified 17 June 2008]

Devendra C, Lewis D (1974) The interaction between dietary lipids and fibre in the sheep. 2. Digestibility studies. Animal Production 48, 67–76.. open url image1

Dixon RM, Hosking BJ (1992) Nutritional value of grain legumes for ruminants. Nutrition Research Reviews 5, 19–43.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Dixon RM, Smith DR, Lindsay JA (1998) Whole white cottonseed or cottonseed meal as supplements for young steers fed low quality roughage. Animal Production in Australia 22, 338. open url image1

Easton EG, Hocking Edwards JE, White CL (1998) The effect of adding salt to a canola meal supplement on wool growth in weaner sheep. Animal Production in Australia 22, 257–260. open url image1

Egan AR, Frederick F, Dixon RM (1987) Improving efficiency of use of supplements by manipulation of management procedures. In ‘Ruminant feeding systems using fibrous agricultural residues. Proceedings of the 6th annual workshop of the Australian-Asian Fibrous Agricultural Residues Research Network, Los Baños, Philippines’. (Ed. RM Dixon) pp. 69–81. (Australian-Asian Fibrous Agricultural Residues Research Network: Los Baños, Philippines)

Farmer CG, Cochran RC, Simms DD, Klevesahl EA, Wickersham TA, Johnson DE (2001) The effects of several supplementation frequencies on forage use and the performance of beef cattle consuming dormant tallgrass prairie forage. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2276–2285.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Foss Tecator (2002a) ‘Application sub-note ASN 3805. The determination of neutral detergent fibre using the Fibercap system.’ (Foss Tecator: Hoganas, Sweden)

Foss Tecator (2002b) ‘Application sub-note ASN 3804. The determination of acid detergent fibre using the Fibercap system.’ (Foss Tecator: Hoganas, Sweden)

Foss Tecator (2002c) ‘Application sub-note ASN 3801. The determination of crude fibre in feed according to AOAC, ISO, AACC and AOCS standards using the Fibercap system.’ (Foss Tecator: Hoganas, Sweden)

Godfrey SI, Rowe JB, Speijers EJ, Toon W (1993) Lupins, barley or barley plus virginiamycin as supplements for sheep at different feeding intervals. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33, 135–140.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Hawthorne WA, Stacey RW (1984) The influence of the quantity and frequency of feeding a lupin grain supplement to grazing lambs. Animal Production in Australia 15, 691. open url image1

Jolly S, Wallace A (2006) ‘Best practice for production feeding of lambs: a review of the literature.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: North Sydney, NSW)

Jordan DJ, Hatcher S, Lee GJ, McConnel I, Bowen MK, Della Bosca AJ, Rowe JB (2006) Nutritional management of reproductive efficiency. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 54, 35–41. open url image1

Kent-Jones DW, Amos AJ (1957) ‘Modern cereal chemistry.’ 5th edn. (Northern Publishing Co. Ltd: Liverpool, UK)

MAFF (1975) Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.

Payne RW, Harding SA, Murray DA, Soutar DM, Baird DB, et al. (2006) ‘The guide to GenStat release 9. Part 2: statistics.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Riggs JK, Colby RW, Sells LV (1953) The effect of self-feeding salt-cottonseed meal mixtures to beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 12, 379–393. open url image1

Rooney LW, Pflugfelder RL (1986) Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. Journal of Animal Science 63, 1607–1623.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Rowe JB (2004) Potential benefits of precision nutrition to increase reproductive efficiency under grazing conditions. Animal Production in Australia 25, 144–147. open url image1

Rowe JB, Atkins KD (2006) Precision sheep production – pipedream or reality? Animal Production in Australia 26, Short Communication number 33.

Rowe JB, Masters DG (2005) Precision nutrition for Merino ewes. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 15, 221–228. open url image1

SCA (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock: ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Schauer CS, Lardy GP, Slanger WD, Bauer ML, Sedivec KK (2004) Self-limiting supplements fed to cattle grazing native mixed-grass prairie in the northern Great Plains. Journal of Animal Science 82, 298–306.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Simeone A, Beretta V, Rowe JB, Baldi F (2003) Supplementing grazing beef cattle weekly or daily with whole maize grain. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 14, 14A. open url image1

Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) ‘Statistical methods.’ 7th edn. (Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA)

Sweeney RA (1989) Generic combustion method for determination of crude protein in feeds. Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists 72, 770–774.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Wood AG, Bolam MJ, Krebs GL, Andressen AR (2000) Whole cottonseed as a supplement for weaner cattle offered Pangola grass hay. Animal Production in Australia 23, 409–412. open url image1