Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Incomplete milking has no detectable effect on somatic cell count but increased cell count appears to increase strip yield

T. Clarke A C , E. M. Cuthbertson A , R. K. Greenall B , M. C. Hannah A and D. Shoesmith A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, 1301 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.

B The University of Melbourne, National Milk Harvesting Centre, 1301 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: tim.clarke@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(9) 1161-1167 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07259
Submitted: 7 August 2007  Accepted: 3 May 2008   Published: 7 August 2008

Abstract

Milking regimes that can greatly shorten the milking duration of slow-milking cows to improve labour productivity can also result in less complete milking for some cows. There is also a common belief and limited experimental evidence that incomplete milking of subclinically infected cows can cause increased somatic cell count (SCC). To test for this possible detrimental effect of shorter milking regimes, ‘complete’ milking [to automatic cluster remover (ACR) setting of 300 mL/min] and ‘incomplete’ milking (to an ACR setting of 800 mL/min) were applied sequentially to 45 cows over 7 weeks. Incomplete milking resulted in an average of 0.3 L of extra milk being left in the udders, but there was no significant increase in quarter SCC in either infected or uninfected udder quarters. Change in SCC was not related to change in strip yield induced by incomplete milking treatment. In contrast, cow strip yield was positively related to SCC, or the number of infected quarters/cow, regardless of the applied ACR treatment. These apparently contradictory findings are reconciled by noting that infection causes both high strip yields (via uneven yielding quarters) and high SCC. It is concluded that, contrary to popular belief, high SCC, as an indicator of infection, causes high strip yield and that increasing strip yield does not increase cell count.


Acknowledgements

We thank Dairy Australia, the Department of Primary Industries, Victoria, for their financial support and Professor Graeme Mein, Jeff Andrews and Rod Dyson for their technical advice and encouragement.


References


Bramley AJ, Dodd FH, Mein GA, Bramley JA (1992) ‘Machine milking and lactation.’ (Insight Books: Berkshire)

Brightling P, Mein G, Hope A, Malmo J, Ryan D (2000) ‘Countdown Downunder. Technotes for mastitis control.’ (Dairy Research and Development Corporation: Melbourne)

Clarke T, Evans ME, Hepworth G, Moate PJ, Stewart JA (1995) Mordant factors that affect the fluorescence and counting of somatic cells by instruments The Journal of Dairy Research 62, 373–394.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Clarke T, Cuthbertson EM, Greenall RK, Hannah MC, Shoesmith D (2004) Milking regimes to shorten milking duration. The Journal of Dairy Research 71, 419–426.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Genstat (2006) ‘Genstat 9. Statistical software.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Mein GA, Smolenaars F (2001) ‘Making the most of the milk harvest. A prospectus for the milk quality and harvesting program.’ (Dairy Research and Development Corporation: Melbourne)

Moran JB, Drysdale GR, Shambrook DA, Markham NK (2000) A study of the key profit drivers in the Victorian dairy industry. In ‘Proceedings of 9th congress of the Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production’. (Ed. GM Stone) pp. 54–57.

Napper AR, Williamson JH (1983) The effect of milking end point on somatic cell count. Annual report (1982/83) of the Agricultural Research Division, MAF, New Zealand.

Rasmussen MD (1993) Influence of switch level of automatic cluster removers on milking performance and udder health. The Journal of Dairy Research 60, 287–297.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Rasmussen MD, Frimer E, Galton DM, Petersson LG (1992) The influence of premilking teat preparation and attachment delay on milk yield and milking performance. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2131–2141. open url image1

Schalm OW, Mead SW (1943) The effect of incomplete milking on chronic mastitis caused by Streptococcus Agalactiae. Journal of Dairy Science 26, 823–832.
CAS |
open url image1

Thiel CC, Dodd FH (1979) Machine milking. Technical Bulletin No.1. p. 236. NIRD, Reading, England.