Cow age, resilience and productivity of cow–calf systems
Amir Gil Sessim A , Tamara Esteves de Oliveira A , Gabriel Ribas Pereira A , Fredy Andrey López González A , Fabiana Moro Maidana A , Daniele Zago A , Concepta Margaret McManus B and Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos
A *
A
B
Abstract
The energy availability for cow–calf systems is related to climate disturbances, and energy use is influenced by the age of the cows. Both factors determine the productivity and resilience of herds after climate disruption.
Identify the time needed for the herds composed of cows of a varying age to achieve resilience after energy restriction in the pre- and postpartum.
The resilience of systems was compared by deterministic dynamic simulation and herds were considered initially stable but different in (1) energy availability for all herd in the first year of production, namely at 50% (low, L), 75% (medium, M) of 100% (high, H) of the requirements according to the NRC (2000, 2016), with these energy levels being restricted to 60 days before and 60 days after the birth, and (2) the maximum age of the cull cow (lifetime, LT), namely 4 (LT4L, LT4M, LT4H), 6 (LT6L, LT6M, LT6H) of 11 (LT11L, LT11M, LT11H) years. From the second year, availability returned to meet the energy requirements of all animals. The availability of energy for the herd was simulated in natural and cultivated pasture. The productivity was determined as the relation between the kilograms of animals sold and the area used for production over a productive cycle. The system model was considered resilient when 95% of the standard productivity was reached (prior to energy restriction).
The time required to return to stability was 2 years in the LT6 and LT11, whereas LT4 required 3 years. Furthermore, LT6 had a higher productivity than did the other herds. The older the culled cow was, the greater was the change in the composition of the product commercialised.
Cows with an intermediate culling age allowed a sustainable intensification of the system, because they showed better productivity than did older cull cows. Furthermore, after climate disturbance, they presented more resilience than did younger cull cows. The level of energy restriction did not directly influence the time to resilience within each evaluated discard-age group.
Herds that culled females before reaching adult age are less resilient after disturbances, such as changes in climate or changes of any nature that interfere with reproductive rates.
Keywords: beef cattle herd, cow longevity, culling of beef cows, energy restriction, herd structure, life expectancy of cows, nutrition, replacement of beef cows, resistance, reversibility, sustainable intensification.
References
Ash A, Hunt L, McDonald C, Scanlan J, Bell L, Cowley R, Watson I, McIvor J, MacLeod N (2015) Boosting the productivity and profitability of northern Australian beef enterprises: exploring innovation options using simulation modelling and systems analysis. Agricultural Systems 139, 50-65.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bellows RA, Short RE (1978) Effects of precalving feed level on birth weight, calving difficulty and subsequent fertility. Journal of Animal Science 46, 1522-1528.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Carvalho PCF, Wallau MO, Bremm C, Bonnet O, Trindade JK, da Rosa FQ, de Freitas TS, Moojen FG (2017) Nativão: 30 anos de pesquisa em campo nativo. p. 146. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Agronomia, Departamento de Plantas Forrageiras e Agrometeorologia, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Ciccioli NH, Wettemann RP, Spicer LJ, Lents CA, White FJ, Keisler DH (2003) Influence of body condition at calving and postpartum nutrition on endocrine function and reproductive performance of primiparous beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3107-3120.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Corah LR, Dunn TG, Kaltenbach CC (1975) Influence of prepartum nutrition on the reproductive performance of beef females and the performance of their progeny. Journal of Animal Science 41, 819-824.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Dick M, da Silva MA, Dewes H (2015) Life cycle assessment of beef cattle production in two typical grassland systems of southern Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 96, 426-434.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dunn TG, Ingalls JE, Zimmerman DR, Wiltbank JN (1969) Reproductive performance of 2-year-old Hereford and Angus heifers as influenced by pre-and post-calving energy intake. Journal of Animal Science 29, 719-726.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Dunne LD, Diskin MG, Boland MP, O’Farrell KJ, Sreenan JM (1999) The effect of pre- and post-insemination plane of nutrition on embryo survival in beef heifers. Animal Science 69, 411-417.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dunne LD, Diskin MG, Sreenan JM (2000) Embryo and foetal loss in beef heifers between day 14 of gestation and full term. Animal Reproduction Science 58, 39-44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
ESALQ-CEPEA (2019) Indicador do Bezerro Esalq/BM&FBOVESPA – data base. Available at https://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/br/consultas-ao-banco-de-dados-do-site.aspx [Accessed 20 May 2019]
Feuz DM, Skold MD (1992) Typical farm theory in agricultural research. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2, 43-58.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Godfray HCJ (2015) The debate over sustainable intensification. Food Security 7, 199-208.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Goehring TB, Corah LR, Higgins JJ (1989) Effects of energy and lasalocid on productivity of first-calf heifers. Journal of Animal Science 67, 1879-1888.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gregory KE, Echternkamp SE, Dickerson GE, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, Van Vleck LD (1990) Twinning in cattle: III. Effects of twinning on dystocia, reproductive traits, calf survival, calf growth and cow productivity. Journal of Animal Science 68, 3133-3144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience: in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31, 425-439.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Houghton PL, Lemenager RP, Moss GE, Hendrix KS (1990) Prediction of postpartum beef cow body composition using weight to height ratio and visual body condition score. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1428-1437.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
INMET (2023) Monitoramento de Precipitação. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. Available at https://portal.inmet.gov.br/ [Accessed 29 November 2023]
Lamb MA, Tess MW, Robison OW (1992) Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: I. Cow–calf segment. Journal of Animal Science 70, 689-699.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lampert VdN, Canozzi MEA, McManus CM, Dill MD, Oliveira TEd, Mercio TZ, Teixeira OdS, Barcellos JOJ (2020) Modelling beef cattle production systems from the Pampas in Brazil to assess intensification options. Scientia Agricola 77, e20180263.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
López-González FA, Allende R, de Lima JMS, Canozzi MEA, Sessim AG, Barcellos JOJ (2020) Intensification of cow–calf production: how does the system respond biologically to energy inputs in a long-term horizon? Livestock Science 237, 104058.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McFarlane ZD, Cope ER, Hobbs JD, Oakes RN, Pohler KG, Mulliniks JT (2018) Winter grazing of stockpiled native forages during heifer development delays body weight gain without influencing final pregnancy rates. Journal of Animal Science 96, 4633-4643.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Mosnier C, Agabriel J, Lherm M, Reynaud A (2009) A dynamic bio-economic model to simulate optimal adjustments of suckler cow farm management to production and market shocks in France. Agricultural Systems 102, 77-88.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nasca JA, Feldkamp CR, Arroquy JI, Colombatto D (2015) Efficiency and stability in subtropical beef cattle grazing systems in the northwest of Argentina. Agricultural Systems 133, 85-96.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nozières MO, Moulin CH, Dedieu B (2011) The herd, a source of flexibility for livestock farming systems faced with uncertainties? Animal 5, 1442-1457.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Núcleo de Estudos em Sistemas de Produção de Bovinos de Corte e Cadeia Produtiva (NESPro) (2018) Informativo NESPro – data base. Available at http://www.ufrgs.br/nespro/informativos/4/mobile/index.html#p=2 [Accessed 27 March 2021]
Núcleo de Estudos em Sistemas de Produção de Bovinos de Corte e Cadeia Produtiva (NESPro) (2019) NESPro Indices – data base. Available at http://www.ufrgs.br/nespro/nespro_indices_categorias_bovinos.php [Accessed 27 March 2021]
Pang H, Makarechian M, Basarab JA, Berg RT (1999) Structure of a dynamic simulation model for beef cattle production systems. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79, 409-417.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Perry RC, Corah LR, Cochran RC, Beal WE, Stevenson JS, Minton JE, Simms DD, Brethour JR (1991) Influence of dietary energy on follicular development, serum gonadotropins, and first postpartum ovulation in suckled beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 69, 3762-3773.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Peterson G, Allen CR, Holling CS (1998) Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1, 6-18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Piazzetta RG, Dittrich JR, Alves SJ, Moraes AD, Lustosa SBC, Gazda TL, Melo HA, Monteiro ALG (2009) Características qualitativas da pastagem de aveia preta e azevém manejada sob diferentes alturas, obtida por simulação de pastejo. Archives of Veterinary Science 14, 43-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Piccoli ML, Braccini Neto J, Brito FV, Campos LT, Bértoli CD, Campos GS, Cobuci JA, McManus CM, Barcellos JOJ, Gama LT (2014) Origins and genetic diversity of British cattle breeds in Brazil assessed by pedigree analyses. Journal of Animal Science 92, 1920-1930.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Restle J, Roso C, Soares AB (1999) Produção animal e retorno econômico em misturas de gramíneas anuais de estação fria. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 28, 235-243.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Richards MW, Spitzer JC, Warner MB (1986) Effect of varying levels of postpartum nutrition and body condition at calving on subsequent reproductive performance in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 62, 300-306.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Roberts AJ, Petersen MK, Funston RN (2015) Beef Species Symposium: can we build the cowherd by increasing longevity of females? Journal of Animal Science 93, 4235-4243.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rogers PL, Gaskins CT, Johnson KA, MacNeil MD (2004) Evaluating longevity of composite beef females using survival analysis techniques. Journal of Animal Science 82, 860-866.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Roso C, Restle J, Soares AB, Alves Filho DC, Brondani IL (1999) Produção e qualidade de forragem da mistura de gramíneas anuais de estação fria sob pastejo contínuo. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 28, 459-467.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rumpf JM, Van Vleck LD (2004) Age-of-dam adjustment factors for birth and weaning weight records of beef cattle: a review. Genetics and Molecular Research 3, 1-17 Available at https://www.geneticsmr.com/sites/default/files/articles/year2004/vol3-1/pdf/gmr0089.pdf.
| Google Scholar |
Seidel GE, Jr, Whittier JC (2015) Beef Species Symposium: beef production without mature cows. Journal of Animal Science 93, 4244-4251.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sessim AG, de Oliveira TE, López-González FA, de Freitas DS, Barcellos JOJ (2020) Efficiency in cow–calf systems with different ages of cow culling. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7, 476.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Stockton MC, Wilson RK, Feuz DM, Stalker LA, Funston RN (2014) Bioeconomic factors of beef heifer maturity to consider when establishing criteria to optimally select and/or retain herd replacements. Journal of Animal Science 92, 4733-4740.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thomas MG, Mohamed AH, Sawalhah MN, Holechek JL, Bailey DW, Hawkes JM, Luna-Nevarez P, Molinar F, Khumalo G (2015) Long-term forage and cow–calf performance and economic considerations of two stocking levels on Chihuahuan desert rangeland. Rangeland Ecology & Management 68, 158-165.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Turner BL, Rhoades RD, Tedeschi LO, Hanagriff RD, McCuistion KC, Dunn BH (2013) Analyzing ranch profitability from varying cow sales and heifer replacement rates for beef cow-calf production using system dynamics. Agricultural Systems 114, 6-14.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
USDA (2019) US red meat and poultry forecasts – economic research service – data base. Available at https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/g445cd121?locale=en [Accessed 27 October 2020]
Viet A-F, Ezanno P, Petit E, Devun J, Vermesse R, Fourichon C (2013) Resilience of a beef cow–calf farming system to variations in demographic parameters. Journal of Animal Science 91, 413-424.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Wiley JS, Petersen MK, Ansotegui RP, Bellows RA (1991) Production from first-calf beef heifers fed a maintenance or low level of prepartum nutrition and ruminally undegradable or degradable protein postpartum. Journal of Animal Science 69, 4279-4293.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Wiltbank JN, Rowden WW, Ingalls JE, Geegoey KE, Koch RM (1962) Effect of energy level on reproductive phenomena of mature Hereford cows. Journal of Animal Science 21, 219-225.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wiltbank JN, Rowden WW, Ingalls JE, Zimmerman DR (1964) Influence of post-partum energy level on reproductive performance of Hereford cows restricted in energy intake prior to calving. Journal of Animal Science 23, 1049-1053.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
