The comparison of potential key genes on rat uterus and mammary gland regulated by estradiol
Jian Zhang A B and Yan Cui A B *A
B
Abstract
Although numerous studies have investigated the regulation of estrogen (E2) on the female reproductive system, there is still a lack of understanding regarding the specific genes and pathways involved in E2 regulation of the uterus and breast.
The aim of this study was to explore the shared genes and pathways involved in estrogen regulation of the uterus and mammary gland, which could provide a theoretical basis for disease treatment.
Bioinformatics analysis was employed to identify potential genes and pathways associated with E2 regulation of the uterus and breast.
The analysis revealed 233 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in datasets GSE89321 and GSE95783 (adjusted-P < 0.05). Additionally, five KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways were identified: Glutathione Metabolism Pathway, Chagas Disease Pathway, Leishmaniasis Pathway, Complement and Coagulation Cascades Pathway, and p53 Signalling Pathway. A protein interaction network was constructed, and 10 hub genes (Alb, Il1a, Serpine1, Timp1, Ccl11, Fos, Krt19, Krt7, Lcn2, and C3) were selected, with Alb being the highest scoring hub gene. The study also predicted the association of Mo-mir-200a-5p and Mo-Mir-200a-3p with Alb and Krt19. Furthermore, 28 DEGs were identified in E2 regulation of the mammary gland, encompassing pathways such as Acute Myeloid Leukemia, ErbB Signalling Pathway, Th1 and Th2 Cell Differentiation, Th17 Cell Differentiation, and Transcriptional Misregulation in Cancer. Hub genes in the mammary gland included Pgr, Gata3, Areg, Prom1, Stat5a, Cldn4, Greb1, Tfap2c, Pdk4, and Mb. Prom1, Prom2, Fam84a, and Padi2 were found to be common DEGs in E2 regulation of both the uterus and mammary gland.
The findings of this study, together with functional annotation and pathway analysis, suggest that Alb serves as a marker protein in E2 regulation of uterus development. Additionally, Prom1, Prom2, Fam84a, and Padi2 are identified as common DEGs involved in E2 regulation of both the uterus and mammary gland.
This study provides comprehensive omics data to elucidate the mechanisms underlying estrogen regulation of the uterus and mammary gland, opening up new research directions for disease treatment.
Keywords: bioinformatics, E2, genes, mammary gland, mRNAs, pathways, rat, uterus.
References
Allen DL, Mitchner NA, Uveges TE, Nephew KP, Khan S, Ben-Jonathan N (1997) Cell-specific induction of c-fos expression in the pituitary gland by estrogen. Endocrinology 138(5), 2128-2135.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Archer DF, Bernick BA, Mirkin S (2019) A combined, bioidentical, oral, 17β-estradiol and progesterone capsule for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms due to menopause. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology 12(8), 729-739.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Arendt LM, Kuperwasser C (2015) Form and function: how estrogen and progesterone regulate the mammary epithelial hierarchy. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 20(1–2), 9-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bai R, Latifi Z, Kusama K, Nakamura K, Shimada M, Imakawa K (2018) Induction of immune-related gene expression by seminal exosomes in the porcine endometrium. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 495(1), 1094-1101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Brown HM, Green ES, Tan TCY, Gonzalez MB, Rumbold AR, Hull ML, Norman RJ, Packer NH, Robertson SA, Thompson JG (2018) Periconception onset diabetes is associated with embryopathy and fetal growth retardation, reproductive tract hyperglycosylation and impaired immune adaptation to pregnancy. Scientific Reports 8(1), 2114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Calvo E, Luu-The V, Belleau P, Martel C, Labrie F (2012) Specific transcriptional response of four blockers of estrogen receptors on estradiol-modulated genes in the mouse mammary gland. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 134(2), 625-647.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gruber CJ, Tschugguel W, Schneeberger C, Huber JC (2002) Production and actions of estrogens. New England Journal of Medicine 346(5), 340-352.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Haricharan S, Li Y (2014) STAT signaling in mammary gland differentiation, cell survival and tumorigenesis. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 382(1), 560-569.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Helle J, Keiler AM, Zierau O, et al. (2017) Effects of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist 3-methylcholanthrene on the 17β-estradiol regulated mRNA transcriptome of the rat uterus. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 171, 133-143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hewitt SC, Harrell JC, Korach KS (2005) Lessons in estrogen biology from knockout and transgenic animals. Annual Review of Physiology 67, 285-308.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ho TY, Rahman KM, Camp ME, Wiley AA, Bartol FF, Bagnell CA (2017) Timing and duration of nursing from birth affect neonatal porcine uterine matrix metalloproteinase 9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 59, 1-10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ivanga M, Labrie Y, Calvo E, Belleau P, Martel C, Luu-The V, Morissette J, Labrie F, Durocher F (2007) Temporal analysis of E2 transcriptional induction of PTP and MKP and downregulation of IGF-I pathway key components in the mouse uterus. Physiological Genomics 29(1), 13-23.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Khalid AB, Krum SA (2016) Estrogen receptors alpha and beta in bone. Bone 87, 130-135.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kowalik MK, Dobrzyn K, Mlynarczuk J, Rekawiecki R (2022) Effect of steroid hormones, prostaglandins (E2 and F2α), oxytocin, and tumor necrosis factor alpha on membrane progesterone (P4) receptors gene expression in bovine myometrial cells. Animals 12(4), 519.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kuhara A, Yamada N, Sugihara A, Ohyama H, Tsujimura T, Hayashi S, Terada N (2005) Fos plays no role in apoptosis of epithelia in the mouse male accessory sex organs and uterus. Endocrine Journal 52(1), 153-158.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lancheros-Buitrago J, Rodriguez-Villamil P, Gregory J, Bastos H, Camacho CA, Caballeros JE, Cazales N, Barros E, José de Jesus Silva M, Pimentel A, Mattos RC (2020) Ceruloplasmin, serotransferrin and albumin presented different abundance in mares’ uterine fluid five days after insemination. Theriogenology 148, 194-200.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lei J, Wang Y, Guo X, Yan S, Ma D, Wang P, Li B, Du W, Guo R, Kan Q (2020) Low preoperative serum ALB level is independently associated with poor overall survival in endometrial cancer patients. Future Oncology 16(8), 307-316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Liao C-J, Li P-T, Lee Y-C, Li S-H, Chu ST (2014) Lipocalin 2 induces the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in stressed endometrial epithelial cells: possible correlation with endometriosis development in a mouse model. Reproduction 147(2), 179-187.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Liu Y-F, Li M-Y, Yan Y-P, Wei W, Li B, Pan H-Y, Yang Z-M, Liang X-H (2020) ERα-dependent stimulation of LCN2 in uterine epithelium during mouse early pregnancy. Reproduction 159(4), 493-501.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ma Z, Lu D, Zhao W, Wang H (2019) RBP and Alb in neonatal hydronephrosis and its association with IL-12 levels in pregnant women before delivery. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 18(1), 497-502.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
McNally S, Stein T (2017) Overview of mammary gland development: a comparison of mouse and human. In ‘Mammary gland development. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1501’. pp. 1–17. (Humana Press) doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6475-8_1
Mei X, Zhang Y, Quan C, Liang Y, Huang W, Shi W (2022) Characterization of the pathology, biochemistry, and immune response in kunming (KM) mice following Fasciola gigantica infection. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 11, 793571.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Nguyen TT-TN, Shynlova O, Lye SJ (2016) Matrix metalloproteinase expression in the rat myometrium during pregnancy, term labor, and postpartum. Biology of Reproduction 95(1), 24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Okada A, Ohta Y, Brody SL, Iguchi T (2004) Epithelial c-jun and c-fos are temporally and spatially regulated by estradiol during neonatal rat oviduct differentiation. Journal of Endocrinology 182(2), 219-227.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ronis MJJ, Shankar K, Gomez-Acevedo H, et al. (2012) Mammary gland morphology and gene expression differ in female rats treated with 17β-estradiol or fed soy protein isolate. Endocrinology 153(12), 6021-6032.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Song J, Kim OY (2018) Perspectives in lipocalin-2: emerging biomarker for medical diagnosis and prognosis for Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical Nutrition Research 7(1), 1-10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Song J, Sapi E, Brown W, Nilsen J, Tartaro K, Kacinski BM, Craft J, Naftolin F, Mor G (2000) Roles of Fas and Fas ligand during mammary gland remodeling. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 106(10), 1209-1220.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Vasquez YM (2018) Estrogen-regulated transcription: mammary gland and uterus. Steroids 133, 82-86.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Vasquez YM, Nandu TS, Kelleher AM, Ramos EI, Gadad SS, Kraus WL (2020) Genome-wide analysis and functional prediction of the estrogen-regulated transcriptional response in the mouse uterus†. Biology of Reproduction 102(2), 327-338.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Yang LS, Marshall A, Koide SS (1994) Differential effect of estrogen on the production of cyclin B1, CDC2 p34 and C-FOS protein in rat uterus. Endocrine Research 20(4), 377-386.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Yoon KS, Youn N, Gu H, Kwack SJ (2017) Estrogenic activity of zinc pyrithione: an in vivo and in vitro study. Environmental Health and Toxicology 32, e2017004.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zhao H, Kalish F, Wong RJ, Stevenson DK (2017) Infiltration of myeloid cells in the pregnant uterus is affected by heme oxygenase-1. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 101(1), 217-226.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |