Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > AN22418 > Fulltext
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 64(2)

Nutritional characteristics estimated by faecal protein in cattle fed with heterogeneous natural grassland

E. B. Azevedo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4541-8043 A B * , F. Q. Rosa C , R. R. Dornelles C , E. G. Malaguez C , J. K. Da Trindade https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5022-2320 D , D. D. Castagnara C , C. Bremm D , G. R. Liska E and D. B. David B F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.

B Federal University of Pampa (UNIPAMPA), Itaqui, RS, Brazil.

C Federal University of Pampa (UNIPAMPA), Uruguaiana, RS, Brazil.

D Department of Agricultural Diagnosis and Research (DDPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

E Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Araras, SP, Brazil.

F Department of Agricultural Diagnosis and Research (DDPA), São Gabriel, RS, Brazil.

* Correspondence to: eduardo.azevedo@ufsm.br

Handling Editor: Robert Dixon

Animal Production Science 64, AN22418 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22418
Submitted: 26 February 2022  Accepted: 1 January 2024  Published: 18 January 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Improved knowledge of the quality of the diet ingested by grazing cattle requires measurement of the diets selected, including in native pasture rangeland.

Aims

The goal of the present study was to develop empirical equations to predict the intake, digestibility and protein concentration of the diet selected from faecal crude protein concentration of cattle grazing heterogeneous native grasslands through seasonal cycles in the Pampa biome of southern South America.

Methods

In Experiment 1, cattle held in metabolism pens were fed native pasture at 15 and 22.5 g DM/kg bodyweight, or ad libitum. In Experiment 2, cattle also housed in metabolism pens were offered mixtures of the native pasture and Italian ryegrass at a proportion of 0.33 and 0.66 of the mixture, or pure ryegrass. Organic-matter intake (OMI), faecal crude protein excretion (fCP), faecal crude protein concentration (fCPc), OM digestibility (OMD) and diet crude protein concentration (dCPc) were measured in Experiments 1 and 2 and relationships were developed between the diet attributes and faecal crude protein (CP). In the Experiment 3, steers grazed native grasslands (NatG), or native grasslands overseeded with Italian ryegrass (NatG + RyeG). Intake and digestibility equations generated in Experiments 1 and 2 were then evaluated in Experiment 3 to estimate diet attributes from faecal protein measures.

Key results

Three non-linear models (exponential, hyperbolic and mixed, i.e. exponential + hyperbolic) were examined to evaluate the OMD. The mixed model had the highest R2 value (0.74) and the lowest relative prediction error. OMI and dCPc were both linearly related to fCP. The OMD, OMI and dCPc equations were able to detect differences among diets in Experiment 3.

Conclusions

It was verified that the faecal CP can be used to estimate key nutritional characteristics in cattle grazing heterogeneous grasslands in the Pampa biome in South America.

Implications

Relationships between faecal CP and key diet attributes can be used to support further research and models for nutritional assessment of the diet and productivity of grazing cattle in the rangeland system examined.

Keywords: beef cattle, crude protein, digestibility, faecal marker, grazing, intake, native pasture, Pampa biome, rangelands.

References

Allen VG, Batello C, Berretta EJ, Hodgson J, Kothmann M, Li X, McIvor J, Milne J, Morris C, Peeters A, Sanderson M, The Forage and Grazing Terminology Committee (2011) An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 66, 2-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

AOAC (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists.’ (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA)

Azambuja Filho JCR, de Faccio Carvalho PC, François Bonnet OJ, Bastianelli D, Jouven M (2020) Functional classification of feed items in Pampa Grassland, based on their near-infrared spectrum. Rangeland Ecology & Management 73, 358-367.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Azevedo EB, Poli CHEC, David DB, Amaral GA, Fonseca L, Carvalho PCF, Fischer V, Morris ST (2014) Use of faecal components as markers to estimate intake and digestibility of grazing sheep. Livestock Science 165, 42-50.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Boval M, Peyraud JL, Xande A, Aumont G, Coppry O, Saminadin G (1996) Evaluation of faecal indicators to predict digestibility and voluntary intake of Dichanthium spp. by cattle. Annales de Zootechnie 45, 121-134.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Boval M, Archimede H, Fleury J, Xande A (2003) The ability of faecal nitrogen to predict digestibility for goats and sheep fed with tropical herbage. The Journal of Agricultural Science 140, 443-450.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bowen MK, Chudleigh F (2022) Can a return to small ruminants increase profitability and drought resilience in the semiarid rangelands of northern Australia? Animal Production Science 62, 975-982.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Carmona P, Costa DFA, Silva LFP (2020) Feed efficiency and nitrogen use rankings of Bos indicus steers differ on low and high protein diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 263, 114493.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Carvalho PCF, Bremm C, Mezzalira JC, Fonseca L, da Trindade JK, Bonnet OJF, Tischler M, Genro TCM, Nabinger C, Laca EA (2015) Can animal performance be predicted from short-term grazing processes? Animal Production Science 55(3), 319-327.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

CSIRO (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Czarnocki J, Sibbald IR, Evans EV (1961) The determination of chromic oxide in samples of feed and excreta by acid digestion and spectrophotometry. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 41, 167-179.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Da Trindade JK, Neves FP, Pinto CE, Bremm C, Mezzalira JC, Nadin LB, Genro TCM, Gonda HL, Carvalho PCF (2016) Daily forage intake by cattle on natural grassland: response to forage allowance and sward structure. Rangeland Ecology & Management 69, 59-67.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

David DB, Poli CHEC, Azevedo EB, Fernandes MAM, Carvalho PCF, Jochims F, Pimentel CMM (2012) Potential response to supplementation of ewe lambs grazing natural pastures over winter. Small Ruminant Research 105, 22-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

David DB, Poli CHEC, Savian JV, Amaral GA, Azevedo EB, Carvalho PCF, Mcmanus CM (2014) Faecal index to estimate intake and digestibility in grazing sheep. The Journal of Agricultural Science 152, 667-674.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dick M, Abreu da Silva M, Dewes H (2015) Mitigation of environmental impacts of beef cattle production in southern Brazil – evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 87, 58-67.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dixon R, Coates D (2009) Near infrared spectroscopy of faeces to evaluate the nutrition and physiology of herbivores. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 17, 1-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Elejalde DAG, Nabinger C, Pascual MGC, Ferreira ET, Missio RL, Kunrath TR, Devincenzi T, Cardoso RR (2012) Quality of the forage apparently consumed by beef calves in natural grassland under fertilization and oversown with cool season forage species. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 41, 1360-1368.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

EMBRAPA (2013) ‘Sistema Brasileiro de classificação de solos.’ 3rd edn. (EMBRAPA: Brasília, Brazil)

Ferreira ET, Nabinger C, Elejalde DAG, Freitas AKd, Carassai IJ, Schmitt F (2011) Fertilization and oversowing on natural grassland: effects on pasture characteristics and yearling steers performance. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 2039-2047.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ferreira LMM, Celaya R, Benavides R, Jáuregui BM, García U, Sofia Santos A, Rosa García R, Rodrigues MAM, Osoro K (2013) Foraging behaviour of domestic herbivore species grazing on heathlands associated with improved pasture areas. Livestock Science 155, 373-383.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fraser MD, Davies DA, Vale JE, Nute GR, Hallett KG, Richardson RI, Wright IA (2009) Performance and meat quality of native and continental cross steers grazing improved upland pasture or semi-natural rough grazing. Livestock Science 123, 70-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fuentes-Pila J, Delorenzo MA, Beede DK, Staples CR, Holter JB (1996) Evaluation of equations based on animal factors to predict intake of lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 1562-1571.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Fuhlendorf SD, Fynn RWS, McGranahan DA, Twidwell D (2017) Heterogeneity as the basis for rangeland management. In ‘Rangeland systems: processes, management and challenges’. (Ed. DD Briske) pp. 169–196. (Springer: New York, NY, USA)

Holechek JL, Vavra M, Arthun D (1982) Relationships between performance, intake, diet nutritive quality and fecal nutritive quality of cattle on mountain range. Journal of Range Management 35, 741.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Johnson AD (1978) Sample preparation and chemical analysis of vegetation. In ‘Measurement of grassland vegetation and animal production’. (Ed. L ’t Mannetje) pp. 96–102. (Commonweath Agricultural Bureax: Aberystwyth, Wales, UK)

Junges AH, Bremm C, Fontana DC, Oliveira CAOd, Schaparini LP, Carvalho PCdF (2016) Temporal profiles of vegetation indices for characterizing grazing intensity on natural grasslands in Pampa biome. Scientia Agricola 73, 332-337.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kneebone DG, Dryden GM (2014) Prediction of diet quality for sheep from faecal characteristics: comparison of near-infrared spectroscopy and conventional chemistry predictive models. Animal Production Science 55, 1-10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kozloski GV, Oliveira L, Poli CHEC, Azevedo EB, David DB, Ribeiro Filho HMN, Collet SG (2014) Faecal nitrogen excretion as an approach to estimate forage intake of wethers. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 98, 659-666.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kozloski GV, Zilio EMC, Ongarato F, Kuinchtner BC, Saccol AG, Genro TCM, Oliveira L, Faria BM, Cezimbra IM, Quadros FLF (2018) Faecal N excretion as an approach for estimating organic matter intake by free-ranging sheep and cattle. The Journal of Agricultural Science 156, 443-449.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lancaster RJ (1949) Estimation of digestibility of grazed pasture from faeces nitrogen. Nature 163, 330-331.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lippke H (1980) Forage characteristics related to intake, digestibility and gain by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 50, 952-961.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lukas M, Südekum K-H, Rave G, Friedel K, Susenbeth A (2005) Relationship between fecal crude protein concentration and diet organic matter digestibility in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1332-1344.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lyons RK, Stuth JW (1992) Fecal NIRS equations for predicting diet quality of free-ranging cattle. Journal of Range Management 45, 238-244.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ma L, Yuan F, Liang H, Rong Y (2014) The effects of grazing management strategies on the vegetation, diet quality, intake and performance of free grazing sheep. Livestock Science 161, 185-192.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Malaguez EG, Gonçalves TL, Giudice BB, Oaigen RP, Castagnara DD, de Azevedo EB (2020) Mineral, protein, and energy supplementation in heifers in a native Pampa biome pasture during winter. Journal of Neotropical Agriculture 7, 1-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mccollum FT, III, Horn GW (1990) Protein supplementation of grazing livestock: a review. The Professional Animal Scientist 6, 1-16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

NASEM (2016) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 8th edn. (National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA)

Penning PD (2004) Animal-based techniques for estimating herbage intake. In ‘Herbage intake handbook’. (Ed. PD Penning) pp. 53–93. (British Grassland Society: Reading, UK)

Peripolli V, Prates ER, Barcellos JOJ, Neto JB (2011) Fecal nitrogen to estimate intake and digestibility in grazing ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 163, 170-176.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pino F, Mitchell LK, Jones CM, Heinrichs AJ (2018) Comparison of diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, rumen rate of passage, and feed efficiency in dairy heifers fed ad-libitum versus precision diets with low and high quality forages. Journal of Applied Animal Research 46(1), 1296-1306.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Raymond WF (1948) Evaluation of herbage for grazing. Nature 161, 937-938.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Reeves JL, Derner JD, Sanderson MA, Petersen MK, Vermeire LT, Hendrickson JR, Kronberg SL (2013) Seasonal temperature and precipitation effects on cow-calf production in northern mixed-grass prairie. Livestock Science 155, 355-363.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rymer C (2000) The measurement of forage digestibility in vivo. In ‘Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition’. (Eds DI Givens, E Owen, RFE Axford, HM Omed) pp. 113–134. (CABI: Wallingford, UK)

Savian JV, Genro TCM, Barth Neto A, Bremm C, Azevedo EB, David DB, Gonda HL, Carvalho PCF (2018) Comparison of faecal crude protein and n-alkanes techniques to estimate herbage intake by grazing sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 242, 144-149.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schlecht E, Susenbeth A (2006) Estimating the digestibility of Sahelian roughages from faecal crude protein concentration of cattle and small ruminants. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 90, 369-379.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Silva LFP, Dixon RM, Costa DFA (2019) Nitrogen recycling and feed efficiency of cattle fed protein-restricted diets. Animal Production Science 59, 2093-2107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sollenberger LE, Moore JE, Allen VG, Pedreira CGS (2005) Reporting forage allowance in grazing experiments. Crop Science 45, 896-900.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tothill JC, Hargreaves JNG, Jones RM, McDonald CK (1992) BOTANAL – a comprehensive sampling and computing procedure for estimating pasture yield and composition. Field sampling. CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583-3597.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wang CJ, Tas BM, Glindemann T, Rave G, Schmidt L, Weißbach F, Susenbeth A (2009) Fecal crude protein content as an estimate for the digestibility of forage in grazing sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 149, 199-208.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yahdjian L, Sala OE, Havstad KM (2015) Rangeland ecosystem services: shifting focus from supply to reconciling supply and demand. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13(1), 44-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yang C, Gao P, Hou F, Yan T, Chang S, Chen X, Wang Z (2018) Relationship between chemical composition of native forage and nutrient digestibility by Tibetan sheep on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Animal Science 96, 1140-1149.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |