Validation of body condition score based on subcutaneous fat thickness measurements in primiparous Gyr cows
Catiúcia Oliveira Miranda
A * , Ana Carolina Almeida Rollo de Paz A , Ricardo Dutra do Bem A , Glayk Humberto Vilela Barbosa A , Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante A , Aníbal Eugênio Vercesi Filho A , André Rabelo Fernandes B and Lenira El Faro A
A Instituto de Zootecnia, Sertãozinho, SP, 14160-900, Brazil.
B Faculdades Associadas de Uberaba, FAZU, Uberaba, MG, 38061-500, Brazil.
Animal Production Science 62(3) 295-300 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20370
Submitted: 22 July 2020 Accepted: 4 October 2021 Published: 11 November 2021
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing
Abstract
Context: The body condition score (BCS) is an easily measured, fast, inexpensive, and non-invasive tool to estimate the amount of body fat and to evaluate the nutritional status of dairy cows.
Aims: The aim of this study was to validate BCS in primiparous Gyr cows by using ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat (FT).
Methods: Body weight, BCS (score of 1–9) and FT measured at five body sites (FT1–FT5) were recorded during the prepartum and postpartum periods. Linear regression of FT on BCS and Pearson’s correlations were used.
Key results: The correlations between body weight and FT measures ranged from 0.49 to 0.63 and from 0.51 to 0.64 during the pre- and postpartum periods respectively, while the correlations between BCS and FT ranged from 0.69 to 0.82 and from 0.67 to 0.78 in the two periods. The BCS better reflected the variation in FT before and after calving than did body weight. Linear regression models were used to explore the relationship between BCS and FT measurements considering the former as the predictor variable. The coefficients of determination (R2) obtained for the prepartum variables ranged from 0.48 to 0.67. The highest R2 was obtained for the model that included FT measured in the lumbar region midway between the last rib and tuber coxae (hook; FT4) as the response variable. The R2 of the models whose response variables were obtained during the postpartum period ranged from 0.45 to 0.60. The highest R2 was observed when the pelvic region midway between the tuber coxae (hook) and tuber ischii (pin; FT2) was used as a response variable.
Conclusions: The correlations between BCS and FT validate the use of BCS obtained by visual assessment as a tool for evaluating fat reserves in Gyr dams before calving and during first lactation. Among the FT measurements, FT2 and FT4 are interesting because both are easy to measure and showed higher correlations and coefficients of determination with BCS before calving and lactation.
Implications: The BCS is an accessible tool for producers that requires only training of the evaluator and that is economically viable since no special equipment is needed.
Keywords: body condition score, body weight, dairy cattle, lactation, stages of lactation, subcutaneous fat thickness, zebu breed.
References
Ayres H, Ferreira RM, de Souza Torres-Júnior JRS, Demétrio CGB, de Lima CG, Barusseli PS (2009) Validation of body condition score as a predictor of subcutaneous fat in Nelore (Bos indicus) cows. Livestock Science 123, 175–179.| Validation of body condition score as a predictor of subcutaneous fat in Nelore (Bos indicus) cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
BIF Beef Improvement Federation (2002) ‘Guidelines for uniform beef improvement programs.’ (Ed. WD Hohenboken) (BIF Beef Improvement Federation: Athens, GA, USA)
Domecq JJ, Skidmore AL, Lloyd JW, Kaneene JB (1995) Validation of body condition scores with ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 2308–2313.
| Validation of body condition scores with ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat of dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8598414PubMed |
Ferreira MBD, Lopes BC, Azevedo NA, Ledic IL (2005) Escore corporale manejo reprodutivo de vacas Gir leiteiro. Revista Gir Leiteiro 5, 46–54.
Friggens NC (2003) Body lipid reserves and the reproductive cycle: towards a better understanding. Livestock Production Science 83, 219–236.
| Body lipid reserves and the reproductive cycle: towards a better understanding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gentil NR, Santos ADF, Pereira MA, Lima MS, Guimarães JCT, Gomes LC, Dantas FC, Oliveira VS (2017) Validation of body condition score system in Holstein × Zebu cows via ultrasound method during the transition period and early lactation. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 38, 3797–3806.
| Validation of body condition score system in Holstein × Zebu cows via ultrasound method during the transition period and early lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Halachimi I, Polak P, Roberts DJ, Klopcic M (2008) Cow body shape and automation of condition scoring. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4444–4451.
| Cow body shape and automation of condition scoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hussein HA, Westphal A, Staufenbiel R (2013) Relationship between body condition score and ultrasound measurement of fat thickness in multiparous Holstein dairy cows at different production phases. Australian Veterinary Journal 91, 185–189.
| Relationship between body condition score and ultrasound measurement of fat thickness in multiparous Holstein dairy cows at different production phases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23614513PubMed |
Isensee A, Leiber F, Bieber A, Spengler A, Ivemeyer S, Maurer V, Klocke P (2014) Comparison of a classical with a highly formularized body condition scoring system for dairy cattle. Animal Cambridge University Press 8, 1971–1977.
| Comparison of a classical with a highly formularized body condition scoring system for dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Janzekovic M, Mocnik U, Brus M (2015) Ultrasound measurements for body condition score assessment of dairy cows. DAAAM International 5, 51–58.
Lee S, Cho K, Park M, Choi T, Kim S, Do C (2016) Genetic parameters of milk β-hydroxybutyric acid and acetone and their genetic association with milk production traits of Holstein cattle. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 29, 1530–1540.
| Genetic parameters of milk β-hydroxybutyric acid and acetone and their genetic association with milk production traits of Holstein cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moreira F, Risco C, Pires MFA, Ambrose JD, Drost M, DeLorenzo M, Thatcher WW (2000) Effect of body condition on reproductive efficiency of lactating dairy cows receiving a timed insemination. Theriogenology 53, 1305–1319.
| Effect of body condition on reproductive efficiency of lactating dairy cows receiving a timed insemination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10832755PubMed |
Ninomiya S, Sato S (2009) Effects of ‘Five freedoms’ environmental enrichment on the welfare of calves reared indoors. Animal Science Journal 80, 347–351.
| Effects of ‘Five freedoms’ environmental enrichment on the welfare of calves reared indoors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20163647PubMed |
NRC National Research Council (2001) ‘Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle.’, 7th edn. (National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA)
Rocha ED, Andrade VJ, Euclides Filho K, Nogueira E, Figueiredo GR (2003) Tamanho de vacas Nelore adultas e seus efeitos no sistema de produção de gado de corte. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 55, 474–479.
| Tamanho de vacas Nelore adultas e seus efeitos no sistema de produção de gado de corte.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roche JR, Berry DP, Kolver ES (2006) Holstein-Friesian strain and feed effects on milk production, body weight and body condition score profiles in grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3532–3543.
| Holstein-Friesian strain and feed effects on milk production, body weight and body condition score profiles in grazing dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16899689PubMed |
Santana ML, Pereira RJ, Bignardi AB, Vercesi Filho AE, Menéndez-Buxadera A, El Faro L (2015) Detrimental effect of selection for milk yield on genetic tolerance to heat stress in purebred Zebu cattle: genetic parameters and trends. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 9035–9043.
| Detrimental effect of selection for milk yield on genetic tolerance to heat stress in purebred Zebu cattle: genetic parameters and trends.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26476953PubMed |
SAS (2002) ‘SAS User’s Guide: Statistics Version 91 SAS.’ (SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA)
Schröder UJ, Staufenbiel R (2006) Invited review: Methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of fat thickness. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1–14.
| Invited review: Methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of fat thickness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16357263PubMed |
Schwager-Suter R, Strieker C, Erdin D, Künzi N (2000) Relationship between body condition scores and ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat and m.longissimus dorsi in dairy cows differing in size and type. Animal Science 71, 465–470.
| Relationship between body condition scores and ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat and m.longissimus dorsi in dairy cows differing in size and type.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singh R, Randhawa SNS, Randhawa CS (2015) Body condition score and its correlation with ultrasonographic back fat thickness in transition crossbred cows. Veterinary World 8, 290–294.
| Body condition score and its correlation with ultrasonographic back fat thickness in transition crossbred cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27047087PubMed |
Stouffer JR, Cross HR (1985) Evaluation of beef cattle with real-time linear array ultrasound. Journal of Animal Science 61, 144
Zulu VC, Nakao T, Moriyoshi M, Nakada K, Sawamukai Y, Tanaka Y, Zhang WC (2001) Relationship between body condition score and ultrasonographic measurement of subcutaneous fat in dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 6, 816–820.
| Relationship between body condition score and ultrasonographic measurement of subcutaneous fat in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
