Benchmarking Australian sheep parasite control practices: a national online survey
A. F. Colvin
A D , I. Reeve B , B. Peachey C and S. W. Walkden-Brown A
A Animal Science, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Institute for Rural Futures, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C Australian Wool Innovation Ltd, GPO Box 4177, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: alison.colvin@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 61(3) 237-245 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20171
Submitted: 20 March 2020 Accepted: 27 July 2020 Published: 14 September 2020
Abstract
Context: The third Australian national survey on control practices for internal and external parasites of sheep, following similar surveys in 2003 and 2011.
Aims: To document current parasite control practices and attitudes, measure change and to provide a benchmark against which to assess future practices and attitudes.
Methods: An online survey emailed to 6460 sheep producers, with a paper version supplied on request. A follow up short survey was conducted to assess non-response bias. Analysis by region and key sheep enterprise.
Key results: There were 354 and 250 useable responses to the main and short surveys respectively. Mean reported rainfall of 407 mm in 2018 was 27% lower than the average for respondents and >200 mm lower than mean reported rainfall in the previous surveys. The top three methods for worm control over the past 5 years were preventative treatments (74%), preparing clean pastures by spelling paddocks (62%) and treatment on the basis of faecal worm egg count (WEC, 54%). The proportion of respondents using WEC monitoring in 2018 was 40.4%, with a mean frequency of 3.1/year, and this was unaffected by sheep class. The frequency of anthelmintic treatment for ewes and lambs and weaners was 2.1/year. Of the respondents, 36.7% had performed an anthelmintic resistance test in the previous 5 years. The most popular flystrike control methods were timing of crutching (76.4%), preventative chemical treatment (75.9%), timing of shearing (63.1%), mulesing (46.8%) and genetic selection (46.4%). Pain relief was widely used for mulesing ewes (86.6%) and wethers (90.9%). Only 17.3% used Australian Sheep Breeding Values for traits in rams. Most respondents reported ‘evidence of lice’ in the past 5 years (55.8%) and had treated for lice off shears (50.1%), short wool (16.6%) or long wool (6.6%), with only 26.7% having not treated at all in the period. Web-based sources of information on parasite control have become increasingly important.
Conclusions: Notable changes since the earlier surveys were high rates of pain relief when mulesing, an increase in the use of Australian Sheep Breeding Values for parasite-related traits, an increase in WEC monitoring since 2011 and an increased use of web-based resources.
Implications: Parasite control remains important for sheep producers and continues to evolve with new drugs and approaches. The surveys highlight the effectiveness of extension networks and identify where more attention is required.
Additional keywords: gastrointestinal nematodes, sheep blowfly, sheep lice, sheep production.
References
Greeff JC, Karlsson LJE, Schlink AC, Gilmour AR (2018) Factors explaining the incidence of breech strike in a Mediterranean environment in unmulesed and uncrutched Merino sheep. Animal Production Science 58, 1279–1288.| Factors explaining the incidence of breech strike in a Mediterranean environment in unmulesed and uncrutched Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones A, Curnow M, van Burgel AJ (2014) Report on the National Producers and Service Providers Surveys 2014 for the evaluation of Sheep CRC Program 1. Sheep CRC Survey Report 24_2. Available at http://www.livestocklibrary.com.au/bitstream/handle/1234/35365/Sheep%20CRC%2024_2.pdf?sequence=1 [Verified 7 August 2020]
Kahn LP, Woodgate RG (2012) Integrated parasite management: products for adoption by the Australian sheep industry. Veterinary Parasitology 186, 58–64.
| Integrated parasite management: products for adoption by the Australian sheep industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22154258PubMed |
Lane J, Jubb T, Shephard R, Webb-Ware J, Fordyce G (2015) ‘Priority list of endemic diseases for the red meat industries.’ (Meat & Livestock Australia Ltd, North Sydney). Available at https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/search-rd-reports/final-report-details/Animal-Health-and-Biosecurity/Priority-list-of-endemic-diseases-for-the-red-meat-industries/2895 [Verified 11 August 2020].
Playford M, Smith A, Love S, Besier R, Kluver P, Bailey J (2014) Prevalence and severity of anthelmintic resistance in ovine gastrointestinal nematodes in Australia (2009–2012). Australian Veterinary Journal 92, 464–471.
| Prevalence and severity of anthelmintic resistance in ovine gastrointestinal nematodes in Australia (2009–2012).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25424758PubMed |
Reeve I, Thompson L (2005) ‘Integrated parasite management in sheep project: benchmark survey.’ (Institute for Rural Futures, University of New England, Armidale). Available at https://www.une.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0015/25611/2005-ipms-benchmark-report.pdf. [Verified 7 August 2020]
Reeve I, Walkden-Brown SW (2014) Benchmarking Australian sheep parasite control: cross-sectional survey report. (Australian Wool Innovation and Meat and Livestock Australia, University of New England, Armidale). Available at: https://www.wool.com/globalassets/wool/sheep/research-publications/welfare/surveys/benchmarking-australian-sheep-parasite control-cross-sectional-survey-report-feb-2014.pdf [Verified 7 August 2020]
Savage G (1998) The Residue implications of sheep ectoparasites: a report for the the Woolmark Company, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Sloane R (2018) ‘AWI 2017 Merino husbandry practices survey.’ (Australian Wool Innovation Ltd, Sydney). Available at https://www.wool.com/globalassets/wool/sheep/research-publications/welfare/2018-rd-update/2017-merino-husbandry-practices-survey-bsloane.pdf [Verified 7 August 2020].
Sneddon J, Rollin B (2010) Mulesing and animal ethics. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 23, 371–386.
| Mulesing and animal ethics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walkden-Brown SW, Reeve I, Thompson L, Kahn LP, Crampton A, Larsen JW, Woodgate RG, James PJ, de Fegely CR, Williams STC (2006) IPMs project benchmarking survey: A national survey of parasite control practices. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian sheep veterinarians annual conference’, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia. (Ed. C Tengrove) pp. 38-47. (Australian Sheep Veterinarian Society: St Leonards, NSW)
Wardhaugh KG, Morton R, Bedo D, Horton BJ, Mahan RJ (2007) Estimating the incidence of fly myiases in Australian sheep flocks: development of a weather-driven regression model. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 21, 153–167.
| Estimating the incidence of fly myiases in Australian sheep flocks: development of a weather-driven regression model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17550435PubMed |
Zhang L, Yan C, Guo Q, Zhang J, Ruiz-Menjivar J (2018) The impact of agricultural chemical inputs on environment: global evidence from informetrics analysis and visualization. The International Journal of Low Carbon Technologies 13, 338–352.
| The impact of agricultural chemical inputs on environment: global evidence from informetrics analysis and visualization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
