Welfare implications for barn (and aviary) egg production systems
M. Singh
A B and P. J. Groves A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, 425 Werombi Road, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: mini.singh@sydney.edu.au
Animal Production Science 61(10) 837-847 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19634
Submitted: 23 November 2019 Accepted: 17 June 2020 Published: 21 August 2020
Abstract
Barn production systems in Australia are either an indoor-housing floor system or an aviary system with multilevel structures, equipped with nesting boxes, perches and feeding and watering systems. These systems offer hens the freedom of movement and an opportunity to display a repertoire of favourable behaviours as well as interact with complex housing elements as compared with caged systems. However, the system can create prospects for the hens to express detrimental behaviours such as feather pecking and cannibalism. Other aspects of welfare that may be compromised when compared with cage systems include incidence of fractures and injuries during navigation of hens among elements of housing that may result in collision or falls. Barn production systems may have an advantage over free-range production systems in relation to the protection they offer from predators and predator stress, and diseases and parasites that can be contracted from range areas. Barn systems also offer better biosecurity due to lack of direct access to wild birds and their faeces. The aim of the present review is to assess the welfare status of birds housed in barn (and aviary) production systems, while considering husbandry factors that affect welfare outcomes, the health and disease implications and sustainability. To maintain a high welfare outcome in barn production systems, it is important to keep the enclosed environmental conditions optimum by managing air quality, ventilation and lighting within sheds. Sustainability of these production systems depends on consumer preference, cost of production, environmental footprint and suitable genetics of hens.
Additional keywords: air quality, feather pecking, fractures, lighting, red mite.
References
Aerni V, Brinkhof M, Wechsler B, Oester H, Fröhlich E (2005) Productivity and mortality of laying hens in aviaries: a systematic review. World’s Poultry Science Journal 61, 130–142.| Productivity and mortality of laying hens in aviaries: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ali ABA, Campbell DLM, Karcher DM, Siegford JM (2016) Influence of genetic strain and access to litter on spatial distribution of 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system1. Poultry Science 95, 2489–2502.
| Influence of genetic strain and access to litter on spatial distribution of 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system1.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ali ABA, Campbell DLM, Karcher DM, Siegford JM (2019) Nighttime roosting substrate type and height among 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system1. Poultry Science 98, 1935–1946.
| Nighttime roosting substrate type and height among 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system1.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30615148PubMed |
Appleby MC, Hughes BO (1991) Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. World’s Poultry Science Journal 47, 109–128.
| Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Australian Eggs (2019) ‘Australian Eggs Limited Annual Report 2018/2019.’ Available at https://www.australianeggs.org.au/dmsdocument/1058-annual-report-2019 [Verified 20 October 2019]
Beck MM (2017) ‘MEG-Marktbilanz: Eier und Geflugel 2017.’ (Verlag Eugen Ulmer: Stuttgart, Germany)
Bédécarrats GY, Hanlon C (2017) Chapter 7: effect of lighting and photoperiod on chicken egg production and quality. In ‘Egg innovations and strategies for improvements’. (Ed. PY Hester) pp. 65–75. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA)
Berg C, Yngvesson J (2006) The transition from battery cages to loose housing systems and furnished cages for Swedish laying hens. In ‘Proceedings of the 12th European poultry conference’, 10–14 September 2006, Verona, Italy. Paper 106. (World's Poultry Science Association (WPSA): Beekbergen, The Netherlands)
Campbell DLM, Swanson JC, Makagon MM, Siegford JM (2016) Laying hen movement in a commercial aviary: enclosure to floor and back again1. Poultry Science 95, 176–187.
| Laying hen movement in a commercial aviary: enclosure to floor and back again1.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carmichael NL, Walker W, Hughes BO (1999) Laying hens in large flocks in a perchery system: influence of stocking density on location, use of resources and behaviour. British Poultry Science 40, 165–176.
| Laying hens in large flocks in a perchery system: influence of stocking density on location, use of resources and behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10465382PubMed |
Chai L, Xin H, Zhao Y, Wang T, Soupir M, Liu K, Chai LL, Xin HW, Zhao Y, Wang T, Liu K (2018) Mitigating ammonia and PM generation of cage-free henhouse litter with solid additive and liquid spray. Transactions of the ASABE 61, 287–294.
| Mitigating ammonia and PM generation of cage-free henhouse litter with solid additive and liquid spray.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cooper JJ, Albentosa MJ (2003) Behavioural priorities of laying hens. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 14, 127–149.
| Behavioural priorities of laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Courtice JM, Mahdi LK, Groves PJ, Kotiw M (2018) Spotty liver disease: a review of an ongoing challenge in commercial free-range egg production. Veterinary Microbiology 227, 112–118.
| Spotty liver disease: a review of an ongoing challenge in commercial free-range egg production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30473340PubMed |
David B, Mejdell C, Michel V, Lund V, Moe RO (2015a) Air quality in alternative housing systems may have an impact on laying hen welfare. Part II: ammonia. Animals 5, 886–896.
| Air quality in alternative housing systems may have an impact on laying hen welfare. Part II: ammonia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26479391PubMed |
David B, Moe RO, Michel V, Lund V, Mejdell C (2015b) Air quality in alternative housing systems may have an impact on laying hen welfare. Part I: dust. Animals 5, 495–511.
| Air quality in alternative housing systems may have an impact on laying hen welfare. Part I: dust.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26479370PubMed |
Dekker SEM, de Boer IJM, Vermeij I, Aarnink AJA, Groot Koerkamp PWG (2011) Ecological and economic evaluation of Dutch egg production systems. Livestock Science 139, 109–121.
| Ecological and economic evaluation of Dutch egg production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Mol RM, Schouten WGP, Evers E, Drost H, Houwers HWJ, Smits AC (2006) A computer model for welfare assessment of poultry production systems for laying hens. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 54, 157–168.
| A computer model for welfare assessment of poultry production systems for laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dixon LM, Duncan IJH, Mason GJ (2010) The effects of four types of enrichment on feather-pecking behaviour in laying hens housed in barren environments. Animal Welfare 19, 429–435.
Drake KA, Donnelly CA, Dawkins MS (2010) Influence of rearing and lay risk factors on propensity for feather damage in laying hens. British Poultry Science 51, 725–733.
| Influence of rearing and lay risk factors on propensity for feather damage in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21161778PubMed |
Ferrante V, Lolli S, Vezzoli G, Cavalchini LG (2009) Effects of two different rearing systems (organic and barn) on production performance, animal welfare traits and egg quality characteristics in laying hens. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8, 165–174.
| Effects of two different rearing systems (organic and barn) on production performance, animal welfare traits and egg quality characteristics in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fleming RH, McCormack HA, McTeir L, Whitehead CC (2004) Incidence, pathology and prevention of keel bone deformities in the laying hen. British Poultry Science 45, 320–330.
| Incidence, pathology and prevention of keel bone deformities in the laying hen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15327118PubMed |
Fossum O, Jansson DS, Etterlin PE, Vagsholm I (2009) Causes of mortality in laying hens in different housing systems in 2001 to 2004. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 51, 3
| Causes of mortality in laying hens in different housing systems in 2001 to 2004.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19146656PubMed |
Fulton RM (2019) Health of commercial egg laying chickens in different housing systems. Avian Diseases 63, 420–426.
| Health of commercial egg laying chickens in different housing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31967424PubMed |
Gittins J (2018) The impacts of UK buyers’ intentions to purchase only non-cage eggs from 2025. British Poultry Abstracts 14, 3–4.
Grafl B, Polster S, Sulejmanovic T, Purrer B, Guggenberger B, Hess M (2017) Assessment of health and welfare of Austrian laying hens at slaughter demonstrates influence of husbandry system and season. British Poultry Science 58, 209–215.
| Assessment of health and welfare of Austrian laying hens at slaughter demonstrates influence of husbandry system and season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28084805PubMed |
Green LE, Lewis K, Kimpton A, Nicol CJ (2000) Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with management and disease. The Veterinary Record 147, 233–238.
| Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with management and disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11014485PubMed |
Green AR, Wesley I, Trampel DW, Xin H (2009) Air quality and bird health status in three types of commercial egg layer houses. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18, 605–621.
| Air quality and bird health status in three types of commercial egg layer houses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gunnarsson S, Hermansson A (2011) Lighting system for laying hens: pre-testing of new technique in Sweden. In ‘Animal hygiene and sustainable livestock production. Proceedings of the XVth international congress of the International Society for Animal Hygiene. Vol. 1’, 3–7 July 2011, Vienna, Austria. (Eds J Köfer, H Schobesberger) pp. 111–113. (Tribun EU SRO: Brno, Czech Republic)
Hardin E, Castro FLS, Kim WK (2019) Keel bone injury in laying hens: the prevalence of injuries in relation to different housing systems, implications, and potential solutions. World’s Poultry Science Journal 75, 285–292.
| Keel bone injury in laying hens: the prevalence of injuries in relation to different housing systems, implications, and potential solutions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hartcher KM, Wilkinson SJ, Hemsworth PH, Cronin GM (2016) Severe feather-pecking in non-cage laying hens and some associated and predisposing factors: a review. World’s Poultry Science Journal 72, 103–114.
| Severe feather-pecking in non-cage laying hens and some associated and predisposing factors: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heerkens JL, Delezie E, Kempen I, Zoons J, Ampe B, Rodenburg TB, Tuyttens FA (2015) Specific characteristics of the aviary housing system affect plumage condition, mortality and production in laying hens. Poultry Science 94, 2008–2017.
| Specific characteristics of the aviary housing system affect plumage condition, mortality and production in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26188031PubMed |
Heerkens JL, Delezie E, Rodenburg TB, Kempen I, Zoons J, Ampe B, Tuyttens FA (2016) Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems. Poultry Science 95, 482–488.
| Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26628344PubMed |
Höglund J, Nordenfors H, Uggla A (1995) Prevalence of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae, in different types of production systems for egg layers in Sweden. Poultry Science 74, 1793–1798.
| Prevalence of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae, in different types of production systems for egg layers in Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8614688PubMed |
Huber-Eicher B, Wechsler B (1998) The effect of quality and availability of foraging materials on feather pecking in laying hen chicks. Animal Behaviour 55, 861–873.
| The effect of quality and availability of foraging materials on feather pecking in laying hen chicks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9632473PubMed |
Hunt J (2009) Shedding some light on lifting bird welfare. World Poultry 163, 34
Jansson DS, Nyman A, Vagsholm I, Christensson D, Goransson M, Fossum O, Höglund J (2010) Ascarid infections in laying hens kept in different housing systems. Avian Pathology 39, 525–532.
| Ascarid infections in laying hens kept in different housing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21154064PubMed |
Kajlich AS, Shivaprasad HL, Trampel DW, Hill AE, Parsons RL, Millman ST, Mench JA (2015) Incidence, severity, and welfare implications of lesions observed postmortem in laying hens from commercial noncage farms in California and Iowa. Avian Diseases 60, 8–15.
| Incidence, severity, and welfare implications of lesions observed postmortem in laying hens from commercial noncage farms in California and Iowa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Käppeli S, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Fröhlich E, Pfulg A, Stoffel MH (2011) Prevalence of keel bone deformities in Swiss laying hens. British Poultry Science 52, 531–536.
| Prevalence of keel bone deformities in Swiss laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22029778PubMed |
Kaufmann-Bart M, Hoop RK (2009) Diseases in chicks and laying hens during the first 12 years after battery cages were banned in Switzerland. The Veterinary Record 164, 203–207.
| Diseases in chicks and laying hens during the first 12 years after battery cages were banned in Switzerland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19218590PubMed |
Kjaer JB, Vestergaard K (1999) Development of feather pecking in relation to light intensity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62, 243–254.
| Development of feather pecking in relation to light intensity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lambton SL, Knowles TG, Yorke C, Nicol CJ (2010) The risk factors affecting the development of gentle and severe feather pecking in loose housed laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 123, 32–42.
| The risk factors affecting the development of gentle and severe feather pecking in loose housed laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lay DC, Fulton RM, Hester PY, Karcher DM, Kjaer JB, Mench JA, Mullens BA, Newberry RC, Nicol CJ, O’Sullivan NP, Porter RE (2011) Hen welfare in different housing systems 1. Poultry Science 90, 278–294.
| Hen welfare in different housing systems 1.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21177469PubMed |
Manser CE (1996) Effects of lighting on the welfare of domestic poultry: a review. Animal Welfare 5, 341–360.
Martinello A (2018) ‘Egg farmers on track for a cage-free future.’ Available at https://farmers.org.au/news/egg-farmers-on-track-for-a-cage-free-future [Verified 2 September 2019]
Matthews L, Temple W, Foster T, Walker J, McAdie T (1995) Comparison of the demand for dustbathing substrates by layer hens. In ‘Proceedings of the 29th international congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology’. (Eds SM Rutter, J Rushen, HD Randle, JC Eddison) pp. 11–12. (Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: England, UK)
Michel V, Huonnic D (2003) A comparison of welfare, health and production performance of laying hens reared in cages or in aviaries. British Poultry Science 44, 775–776.
| A comparison of welfare, health and production performance of laying hens reared in cages or in aviaries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14965103PubMed |
Mohammed HH (2019) Assessment of the role of light in welfare of layers. SVU – International Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2, 36–50.
| Assessment of the role of light in welfare of layers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moore RJ, Scott PC, Van TTH (2019) Spotlight on avian pathology: Campylobacter hepaticus, the cause of spotty liver disease in layers. Avian Pathology 48, 285–287.
| Spotlight on avian pathology: Campylobacter hepaticus, the cause of spotty liver disease in layers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30942612PubMed |
Nasr MAF, Murrell J, Nicol CJ (2013) The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens. British Poultry Science 54, 165–170.
| The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nicol CJ, Bestman M, Gilani AM, De Haas EN, De Jong IC, Lambton S, Wagenaar JP, Weeks CA, Rodenburg TB (2013) The prevention and control of feather pecking: application to commercial systems. World’s Poultry Science Journal 69, 775–788.
| The prevention and control of feather pecking: application to commercial systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Olsson IAS, Keeling LJ (2000) Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68, 243–256.
| Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Olsson IAS, Keeling LJ (2005) Why in earth? Dustbathing behaviour in jungle and domestic fowl reviewed from a Tinbergian and animal welfare perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93, 259–282.
| Why in earth? Dustbathing behaviour in jungle and domestic fowl reviewed from a Tinbergian and animal welfare perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Parvin R, Mushtaq MMH, Kim MJ, Choi HC (2014) Light emitting diode (LED) as a source of monochromatic light: a novel lighting approach for behaviour, physiology and welfare of poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal 70, 543–556.
| Light emitting diode (LED) as a source of monochromatic light: a novel lighting approach for behaviour, physiology and welfare of poultry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Petrik MT, Guerin MT, Widowski TM (2015) On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indicators in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada. Poultry Science 94, 579–585.
| On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indicators in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25713398PubMed |
Pickel T, Schrader L, Scholz B (2011) Pressure load on keel bone and foot pads in perching laying hens in relation to perch design. Poultry Science 90, 715–724.
| Pressure load on keel bone and foot pads in perching laying hens in relation to perch design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21406354PubMed |
Prescott NB, Wathes CM (1999) Spectral sensitivity of the domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus). British Poultry Science 40, 332–339.
| Spectral sensitivity of the domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10475629PubMed |
Riber AB, Hinrichsen LK (2016) Keel-bone damage and foot injuries in commercial laying hens in Denmark. Animal Welfare 25, 179–184.
| Keel-bone damage and foot injuries in commercial laying hens in Denmark.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rodenburg TB, de Reu K, Tuyttens FAM (2012) Performance, welfare, health and hygiene of laying hens in non-cage systems in comparison with cage systems. In ‘Alternative systems for poultry: health, welfare and productivity’. (Eds V Sandilands, P Hocking) pp. 210–224. (CABI: Wallingford, UK)
Rodenburg TB, Tuyttens FAM, de Reu K, Herman L, Zoons J, Sonck B (2008) Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: an on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare 17, 363–373.
RSPCA (2015) ‘Layer hens RSPCA approved farming scheme standards.’ (RSPCA Australia: Canberra, ACT, Australia)
Sandilands V, Moinard C, Sparks NHC (2009) Providing laying hens with perches: fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury? British Poultry Science 50, 395–406.
| Providing laying hens with perches: fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19735008PubMed |
Scott AB, Singh M, Toribio J-A, Hernandez-Jover M, Barnes B, Glass K, Moloney B, Lee A, Groves P (2017) Comparisons of management practices and farm design on Australian commercial layer and meat chicken farms: cage, barn and free range. PLoS One 12, e0188505
| Comparisons of management practices and farm design on Australian commercial layer and meat chicken farms: cage, barn and free range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29166389PubMed |
Scott AB, Singh M, Groves P, Hernandez-Jover M, Barnes B, Glass K, Moloney B, Black A, Toribio J-A (2018) Biosecurity practices on Australian commercial layer and meat chicken farms: performance and perceptions of farmers. PLoS One 13, e0195582
| Biosecurity practices on Australian commercial layer and meat chicken farms: performance and perceptions of farmers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29668707PubMed |
Sedlačkova M, Bilcik B, Kostal L (2004) Feather pecking in laying hens: environmental and endogenous factors. Acta Veterinaria Brno 73, 521–531.
| Feather pecking in laying hens: environmental and endogenous factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shepherd TA, Xin H, Stinn JP, Hayes MD, Zhao Y, Li H (2017) Ammonia and carbon dioxide emissions of three laying-hen housing systems as affected by manure accumulation time. Transactions of the ASABE 60, 229–236.
| Ammonia and carbon dioxide emissions of three laying-hen housing systems as affected by manure accumulation time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sherwin CM, Richards GJ, Nicol CJ (2010) Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK. British Poultry Science 51, 488–499.
| Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20924842PubMed |
Shimmura T, Suzuki T, Hirahara S, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T (2008) Pecking behaviour of laying hens in single-tiered aviaries with and without outdoor area. British Poultry Science 49, 396–401.
| Pecking behaviour of laying hens in single-tiered aviaries with and without outdoor area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18704784PubMed |
Shimmura T, Hirahara S, Azuma T, Suzuki T, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T (2010) Multi-factorial investigation of various housing systems for laying hens. British Poultry Science 51, 31–42.
| Multi-factorial investigation of various housing systems for laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20390567PubMed |
Sigognault Flochlay A, Thomas E, Sparagano O (2017) Poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) infestation: a broad impact parasitological disease that still remains a significant challenge for the egg-laying industry in Europe. Parasites & Vectors 10, 357
| Poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) infestation: a broad impact parasitological disease that still remains a significant challenge for the egg-laying industry in Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singh M, Cowieson A (2013) Range use and pasture consumption in free-range poultry production. Animal Production Science 53, 1202–1208.
| Range use and pasture consumption in free-range poultry production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singh M, Ruhnke I, de Koning C, Drake K, Skerman AG, Hinch GN, Glatz PC (2017) Demographics and practices of semi-intensive free-range farming systems in Australia with an outdoor stocking density of ≤1500 hens/hectare. PLoS One 12, e0187057
| Demographics and practices of semi-intensive free-range farming systems in Australia with an outdoor stocking density of ≤1500 hens/hectare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29206228PubMed |
Sirovnik J, Stratmann A, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Wurbel H, Toscano MJ (2018) Feeding from perches in an aviary system reduces aggression and mortality in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 202, 53–62.
| Feeding from perches in an aviary system reduces aggression and mortality in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sparagano O, Pavlicevic A, Murano T, Camarda A, Sahibi H, Kilpinen O, Mul M, van Emous R, le Bouquin S, Hoel K, Cafiero MA (2009) Prevalence and key figures for the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae infections in poultry farm systems. Experimental & Applied Acarology 48, 3–10.
| Prevalence and key figures for the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae infections in poultry farm systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stratmann A, Fröhlich EKF, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Harlander-Matauschek A, Würbel H, Toscano MJ (2015) Modification of aviary design reduces incidence of falls, collisions and keel bone damage in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 165, 112–123.
| Modification of aviary design reduces incidence of falls, collisions and keel bone damage in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stratmann A, Mühlemann S, Vögeli S, Ringgenberg N (2019) Frequency of falls in commercial aviary-housed laying hen flocks and the effects of dusk phase length. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 216, 26–32.
| Frequency of falls in commercial aviary-housed laying hen flocks and the effects of dusk phase length.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swanson JC, Mench JA, Karcher D (2015) The coalition for sustainable egg supply project: an introduction. Poultry Science 94, 473–474.
| The coalition for sustainable egg supply project: an introduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25737565PubMed |
Tauson R, Abrahamsson P (1994) Foot and skeletal disorders in laying hens: effects of perch design, hybrid, housing system and stocking density. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 44, 110–119.
| Foot and skeletal disorders in laying hens: effects of perch design, hybrid, housing system and stocking density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Taylor PE, Scott GB, Rose P (2003) The ability of domestic hens to jump between horizontal perches: effects of light intensity and perch colour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 83, 99–108.
| The ability of domestic hens to jump between horizontal perches: effects of light intensity and perch colour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thiele HH (2009) Light stimulation of commercial layers. Lohmann Information 44, 39–48.
Toscano M, Booth F, Richards G, Brown S, Karcher D, Tarlton J (2018) Modeling collisions in laying hens as a tool to identify causative factors for keel bone fractures and means to reduce their occurrence and severity. PLoS One 13, e0200025
| Modeling collisions in laying hens as a tool to identify causative factors for keel bone fractures and means to reduce their occurrence and severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29990363PubMed |
Wang G, Ekstrand C, Svedberg J (1998) Wet litter and perches as risk factors for the development of foot pad dermatitis in floor-housed hens. British Poultry Science 39, 191–197.
| Wet litter and perches as risk factors for the development of foot pad dermatitis in floor-housed hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9649870PubMed |
Wang Y, Wang C, Li B, Wang Y, Wang CY, Li BM (2017) Determination of carbon dioxide concentration standards and minimum ventilation rates of layer house in winter. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao 33, 240–244.
Weeks CA, Nicol CJ (2006) Behavioural needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens. World’s Poultry Science Journal 62, 296–307.
| Behavioural needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weeks CA, Brown SN, Richards GJ, Wilkins LJ, Knowles IG (2012) Levels of mortality in hens by end of lay on farm and in transit to slaughter in Great Britain. The Veterinary Record 170, 647
| Levels of mortality in hens by end of lay on farm and in transit to slaughter in Great Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22678619PubMed |
Widowski TM, Duncan IJ (2000) Working for a dustbath: are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68, 39–53.
| Working for a dustbath: are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10771314PubMed |
Widowski TM, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Rault JL (2016) Laying hen welfare. I. Social environment and space. World’s Poultry Science Journal 72, 333–342.
| Laying hen welfare. I. Social environment and space.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Widowski T, Casey-Trott T, Hunniford M, Morrissey K (2017) Welfare of laying hens: an overview. In ‘Achieving sustainable production of eggs. Vol. 2: animal welfare and sustainability’. (Ed. J Roberts) pp. 57–84. (Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: Cambridge, UK)
Wilkins LJ, McKinstry JL, Avery NC, Knowles TG, Brown SN, Tarlton J, Nicol CJ (2011) Influence of housing system and design on bone strength and keel bone fractures in laying hens. The Veterinary Record 169, 414
| Influence of housing system and design on bone strength and keel bone fractures in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21862469PubMed |
Xin H, Gates RS, Green AR, Mitloehner FM, Moore PA, Wathes CM (2011) Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems. Poultry Science 90, 263–277.
| Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21177468PubMed |
