System impacts of introducing crop grazing into pasture-based systems: the McClymont Memorial Lecture
H. DoveCSIRO Agriculture and Food, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Present address: 81 Boronia Drive, O’Connor, ACT 2601, Australia. Email: hughdove@netspeed.com.au
Animal Production Science 58(3) 445-451 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16781
Submitted: 30 November 2016 Accepted: 20 April 2017 Published: 29 May 2017
Abstract
The present paper briefly discusses the impacts of introducing dual-purpose (DP) crops as a grazing resource into what were previously pasture-only grazing systems. The emphasis is on the high-value crops wheat and canola, since these have the greatest potential to increase profits by providing both winter grazing and a high-value grain or seed crop at harvest. A major potential impact of grazing on such crops is that the reduction in grain yield caused by grazing offsets the value of the grazing obtained. The paper shows that this is not the case and that if crop grazing is performed correctly, there will be minimal impact on grain or seed yield; yield may even be increased. ‘Correctly’ in this context refers mainly to the timely removal of livestock from the crop. Increases in grain yield after grazing arise principally from the conservation of soil water from the winter period through to the grain-ripening stage. The paper emphasises that although the digestibility and crude protein content of DP crops are high, the use of long-season bread wheats as a grazing resource requires that system managers pay greater attention to the sodium and magnesium status of the grazing livestock. This is because of the often high potassium and very low sodium concentrations of wheat forage, which leads to high potassium : sodium ratios in the rumen and reduced absorption of dietary magnesium. Supplementation with sodium and/or magnesium has significantly increased the liveweight gain of stock grazing wheat, but is contra-indicated when grazing canola. The paper also considers the interaction between the amount of grazing provided directly by the crop(s), relative to the possibly increased grazing available from the pasture component of the system, due to ‘pasture spelling’ while livestock are grazing the crop. Data are presented to show that, overall, the introduction of crop grazing into a previously pasture-based system greatly increases the total amount of grazing obtained. In addition, of the total extra grazing obtained in crop–pasture versus pasture-only systems, up to 40% has been found to come from spelled pasture. This has major implications for the management of the total system. The paper concludes by suggesting that, in the future, research on crop–pasture systems should continue, but should pay greater attention to the grazing of DP crops by cattle and particularly by breeding livestock. In addition, there is a need for much better data on the contribution of crop residues to the total grazing system, plus data on the effects of the introduction of DP crops on the wool production of the total grazing system.
Additional keywords: crop water use, grain yield, magnesium, pasture spelling, sheep grazing days, sodium.
References
Bell LW, Hargreaves JNG, Lawes RA, Robertson MJ (2009) Sacrificial grazing of wheat crops: identifying tactics and opportunities in Western Australia’s grainbelt using simulation approaches. Animal Production Science 49, 797–806.| Sacrificial grazing of wheat crops: identifying tactics and opportunities in Western Australia’s grainbelt using simulation approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bell LW, Moore AD, Kirkegaard JA (2014) Evolution in crop–livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia. European Journal of Agronomy 57, 10–20.
| Evolution in crop–livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bell LW, Dove H, McDonald SE, Kirkegaard JA (2015) Integrating dual-purpose wheat and canola into high-rainfall livestock systems in south-eastern Australia. 3. An extrapolation to whole-farm grazing potential, productivity and profitability. Crop and Pasture Science 66, 390–398.
| Integrating dual-purpose wheat and canola into high-rainfall livestock systems in south-eastern Australia. 3. An extrapolation to whole-farm grazing potential, productivity and profitability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davidson JL, Jones DB, Christian KR (1990) Winter feed production and grain yield in mixtures of spring and winter wheats. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 1–18.
| Winter feed production and grain yield in mixtures of spring and winter wheats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dove H, Kelman WM (2015a) Comparison of the alkane-based herbage intakes and the liveweight gains of young sheep grazing forage oats, dual-purpose wheat or phalaris-based pasture. Animal Production Science 55, 1230–1240.
| Comparison of the alkane-based herbage intakes and the liveweight gains of young sheep grazing forage oats, dual-purpose wheat or phalaris-based pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dove H, Kelman WM (2015b) Responses of young sheep grazing dual-purpose wheat to supplementary sodium and magnesium supplied as direct supplement, or to magnesium supplied as fertiliser. Animal Production Science 55, 1217–1229.
| Responses of young sheep grazing dual-purpose wheat to supplementary sodium and magnesium supplied as direct supplement, or to magnesium supplied as fertiliser.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhsVyqu7fK&md5=eb3144b67ef6ea222352f2cb411779d2CAS |
Dove H, Kirkegaard J (2014) The use of dual-purpose crops in sheep-grazing systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94, 1276–1283.
| The use of dual-purpose crops in sheep-grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXht1ygsLs%3D&md5=afcf635f920b599fd6a792f9009eca4bCAS |
Dove H, Kirkegaard J, Kelman W, Sprague S, Hamblin P (2011) Integrating dual-purpose crops: capturing the whole-farm benefits. In ‘GRDC-sponsored grains research technical update’, Young, NSW, 15–16 February 2011. (Eds K Toomey, J Crane) pp. 141–148. (ORM Communications: Bendigo Vic.)
Dove H, Kelman WM, Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ (2012) Impact of sodium/magnesium supplementation on liveweight gains of young sheep grazing dual-purpose cereal or canola crops. Animal Production Science 52, 1027–1035.
| Impact of sodium/magnesium supplementation on liveweight gains of young sheep grazing dual-purpose cereal or canola crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsVCgtbrO&md5=dbfcdd201cd38f7602109a34ee4dbb88CAS |
Dove H, Kirkegaard JA, Kelman WM, Sprague SJ, McDonald SE, Graham JM (2015) Integrating dual-purpose wheat and canola into high-rainfall livestock systems in south-eastern Australia. 2. Pasture and livestock production. Crop and Pasture Science 66, 377–389.
| Integrating dual-purpose wheat and canola into high-rainfall livestock systems in south-eastern Australia. 2. Pasture and livestock production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dove H, Masters DG, Thompson AN (2016) New perspectives on the mineral nutrition of livestock grazing cereal and canola crops. Animal Production Science 56, 1350–1360.
| New perspectives on the mineral nutrition of livestock grazing cereal and canola crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XhtVCltLjM&md5=02c29f921ce175cfdef4fc7f0ab4498fCAS |
Fahim M, Dove H, Kelman W, Ayala-Navarrete L, Larkin PJ (2010) Does grazing of infected wheat by sheep result in salivary transmission of wheat streak mosaic virus? Crop and Pasture Science 61, 247–254.
| Does grazing of infected wheat by sheep result in salivary transmission of wheat streak mosaic virus?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freer M, Dove H, Nolan JV (Eds) (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Gorham J, Hardy C, Wyn Jones RG, Joppa LR, Law CN (1987) Chromosomal location of a K/Na discrimination character in the D genome of wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 74, 584–588.
| Chromosomal location of a K/Na discrimination character in the D genome of wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXjsV2iug%3D%3D&md5=f86f5ffaaa86af9eddc60bff04fb0484CAS |
Harrison MT, Kelman WM, Moore AD, Evans JR (2010) Grazing winter wheat relieves plant water stress and transiently increases photosynthesis. Functional Plant Biology 37, 726–736.
| Grazing winter wheat relieves plant water stress and transiently increases photosynthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXpt1Ckt7Y%3D&md5=3ec6bbec88630bed5311dabc3d7ae73fCAS |
Harrison MT, Evans JR, Dove H, Moore AD (2011) Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected? Crop and Pasture Science 62, 930–946.
| Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelman WM, Dove H (2007) Effects of a spring-sown brassica crop on lamb performance and on subsequent establishment and grain yield of dual-purpose winter wheat and oat crops. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 815–824.
| Effects of a spring-sown brassica crop on lamb performance and on subsequent establishment and grain yield of dual-purpose winter wheat and oat crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelman WM, Dove H (2009) Growth and phenology of winter wheat and oats in a dual-purpose management system. Crop and Pasture Science 60, 921–932.
| Growth and phenology of winter wheat and oats in a dual-purpose management system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Khorasani GR, Armstrong DG (1990) Effect of sodium and potassium level on the absorption of magnesium and other macro-minerals in sheep. Livestock Production Science 24, 223–235.
| Effect of sodium and potassium level on the absorption of magnesium and other macro-minerals in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Sarwar M (1999) Glucosinolate profiles of Australian canola (Brassica napus annua L.) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cultivars: implications for biofumigation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 315–324.
| Glucosinolate profiles of Australian canola (Brassica napus annua L.) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cultivars: implications for biofumigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXit1Klsrs%3D&md5=21678190ee370808faf13f4f6dc99ac6CAS |
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Dove H, Kelman WM, Marcroft SJ, Lieschke AK, Howe JN, Graham JM (2008) Dual-purpose canola: a new opportunity in mixed farming systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 291–302.
| Dual-purpose canola: a new opportunity in mixed farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGrath SR, Bhanugopan MS, Dove H, Clayton EH, Virgona JM, Friend MA (2015) Mineral supplementation of lambing ewes grazing dual-purpose wheat. Animal Production Science 55, 526–534.
| Mineral supplementation of lambing ewes grazing dual-purpose wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXjvVOns78%3D&md5=6d017440e6d83a3227bc8a3fb401d623CAS |
McMullen G, Virgona J, Angus J (2006) Grazing management and the yield of winter wheat in southern NSW: experiments in 2004 and 2005. In ‘GRDC grains research technical update for irrigation croppers’. (Irrigation Research and Extension Committee: Griffith, NSW)
Moore AD (2009) Opportunities and trade-offs in dual-purpose cereals across the southern Australian mixed-farming zone. Animal Production Science 49, 759–768.
| Opportunities and trade-offs in dual-purpose cereals across the southern Australian mixed-farming zone.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nicol AM, Barry TN (1986) The feeding of forage crops. In ‘Supplementary feeding’. (Eds KR Drew, PF Fennessy) pp. 69–106. Occasional publication no. 7. (New Zealand Society of Animal Production: Mosgiel, New Zealand)
Redmon LA, Krenzer EG, Bernado DJ, Horn GW (1996) Effect of wheat morphological stage at grazing termination on economic return. Agronomy Journal 88, 94–97.
| Effect of wheat morphological stage at grazing termination on economic return.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robson S (2007) ‘Nitrate and nitrite poisoning of livestock. Primefact 415 (February 2007).’ (NSW Department of Primary Industries)
Sill WH, Lowe AE, Bellingham RC, Fellows H (1954) Transmission of wheat streak mosaic virus by abrasive leaf contacts during strong winds. Plant Disease Reporter 38, 445–447.
Sprague SJ, Kirkegaard JA, Graham J, Dove H, Kelman W (2014) Crop and livestock production for dual-purpose winter canola (Brassica napus) in the high rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia. Field Crops Research 156, 30–39.
| Crop and livestock production for dual-purpose winter canola (Brassica napus) in the high rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Suttle NF (2010) ‘Mineral nutrition of livestock.’ 4th edn. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Virgona JM, Gummer FAJ, Angus JF (2006) Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1307–1319.
| Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) Decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
| Decimal code for growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
