Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Acidification with sulfur of the separated solid fraction of raw and co-digested pig slurry: effect on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions during storage

F. Gioelli A , E. Dinuccio A B , D. Cuk A , L. Rollè A and P. Balsari A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Agriculture, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), Università degli Studi di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini, 2 – 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy.

B Corresponding author. Email: elio.dinuccio@unito.it

Animal Production Science 56(3) 343-349 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15618
Submitted: 16 September 2015  Accepted: 19 November 2015   Published: 9 February 2016

Abstract

A study was performed to assess: (1) the feasibility to acidify the separated solid fraction of raw and co-digested pig slurry by using a powdery sulfur-based product; and (2) the effect of this acidification method on greenhouse gases and ammonia emissions during manure storage. Samples of raw and co-digested pig slurry were collected at two commercial farms and mechanically separated by a laboratory-scale screw press device. The sulfur powder (80% concentration) was added to the obtained separated solid fractions at three application rates: 0.5%, 1% and 2% (w/w). Carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions were afterwards measured during storage of the acidified samples and compared with those measured from untreated samples (Control). Gaseous emissions were determined with dynamic chamber method by Infrared Photoacoustic Detection. Gaseous losses were monitored along 30 and 60 days of storage time for raw solid fraction and digested solid fraction, respectively. The addition of the tested sulfur powder to solid fractions showed to be a reliable and effective method to acidify raw and co-digested solid fractions. Results showed a significant reduction of both greenhouse gases and ammonia emission regardless of the separated solid fraction type. The highest sulfur application rate (2% w/w) led to a reduction of up to 78% of greenhouse gas emission and 65% of ammonia losses from raw separated solid fraction when compared with the Control. Similar results were achieved from the co-digested solid fraction, with emission reduction of up to 67% for ammonia and 61% for greenhouse gas.

Additional keywords: ammonia volatilisation, greenhouse gases, manure.


References

Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Amon T (2006) Influence of different methods of covering slurry stores on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions. International Congress Series: Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture: An Update 1293, 315–318.

Anderson N, Strader R, Davidson C (2003) Airborne reduced nitrogen: ammonia emissions from agriculture and other sources. Environment International 29, 277–286.
Airborne reduced nitrogen: ammonia emissions from agriculture and other sources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXis1aru78%3D&md5=9cbf3ad2051a79035e695b0f4e95ca96CAS | 12676214PubMed |

AOAC (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists.’ 15th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC)

Balsari P, Dinuccio E, Gioelli F (2006a) A low cost solution for ammonia emission abatement from slurry storage. International Congress Series: Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture: An Update 1293, 323–326.

Balsari P, Gioelli F, Dinuccio E, Santoro E (2006b) Monitoraggio degli impianti di separazione solido liquido dei liquami di suini e di bovini (Monitoring and assessment of different devices for mechanical separation of pig and cattle slurries). Internal report. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Balsari P, Dinuccio E, Gioelli F (2013) A floating coverage system for digestate liquid fraction storage. Bioresource Technology 134, 285–289.
A floating coverage system for digestate liquid fraction storage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXlslWhur0%3D&md5=fc3d08855a0e3e6258cc7cd978124d01CAS | 23500586PubMed |

Berg W, Brunsch R, Pazsiczki I (2006) Greenhouse gas emissions from covered slurry compared with uncovered during storage. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112, 129–134.
Greenhouse gas emissions from covered slurry compared with uncovered during storage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xktl2mtQ%3D%3D&md5=ddc57468292a3fd955143b2f4038506aCAS |

Chadwick D, Sommer S, Thorman R, Fangueiro D, Cardenas L, Amon B, Misselbrook T (2011) Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 514–531.
Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dai XR, Blanes-Vidal V (2013) Emissions of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide from swine wastewater during and after acidification treatment: effect of pH, mixing and aeration. Journal of Environmental Management 115, 147–154.
Emissions of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide from swine wastewater during and after acidification treatment: effect of pH, mixing and aeration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXitFers7Y%3D&md5=6a71c9208e17d9f4cb307046e6110315CAS | 23246907PubMed |

Dinuccio E, Berg W, Balsari P (2008) Gaseous emissions from the storage of untreated slurries and the fractions obtained after mechanical separation. Atmospheric Environment 42, 2448–2459.

Dinuccio E, Gioelli F, Balsari P, Dorno N (2012) Ammonia losses from the storage and application of raw and chemo-mechanically separated slurry. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 153, 16–23.
Ammonia losses from the storage and application of raw and chemo-mechanically separated slurry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dinuccio E, Gioelli F, Balsari P (2014) Prove di separazione meccanica del liquame suino tal quale e co-digerito (Mechanical separation of raw and co-digested pig slurries). In ‘Sostenibilità ambientale ed economica: la gestione degli effluenti negli allevamenti di suini’. (Eds P Bonfanti, G Provolo) pp. 29–37. (Forum Editrice Universitaria Udinese S.r.l.: Udine, Italy)

European Environment Agency (EEA) (2013) Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2011 and inventory report 2013; submission to the UNFCCC secretariat. Copenhagen, Denmark. Available at http://www.eea.europa.eu//publications/european-union-greenhouse-gas-inventory-2013 [Verified 2 December 2015]

European Environment Agency (EEA) (2014) Ammonia (NH3) emissions (APE 003). Copenhagen, Denmark. Available at http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea-32-ammonia-nh3-emissions-1/assessment-4 [Verified 2 December 2015]

Eriksen J, Sorensen P, Elsgaard L (2008) The fate of sulfate in acidified pig slurry during storage and following application to cropped soil. Journal of Environmental Quality 37, 280–286.
The fate of sulfate in acidified pig slurry during storage and following application to cropped soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFegsb0%3D&md5=19382ba30abfb8f673695132f62cd33eCAS | 18178902PubMed |

Fangueiro D, Hjorth M, Gioelli F (2015) Acidification of animal slurry – a review. Journal of Environmental Management 149, 46–56.
Acidification of animal slurry – a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhslyrt7%2FN&md5=865a9cd52dfc3c23d3e4a2f208bd96a6CAS | 25463570PubMed |

Frost JP, Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ (1990) Effect of separation and acidification on ammonia volatilization and on the efficiency of slurry nitrogen for herbage production. The Journal of Agricultural Science 115, 49–56.
Effect of separation and acidification on ammonia volatilization and on the efficiency of slurry nitrogen for herbage production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXltlOn&md5=0fbe65cfe688452eb3955c529d4fb5afCAS |

Fukumoto Y, Rom HB, Dahl P (2003) Relationship between gas depth profiles in compost heap and gas emission. Agricultural Engineering International 5, 1–13.

Hjorth M, Christensen KV, Christensen ML, Sommer SG (2010) Solid–liquid separation of animal slurry in theory and practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30, 153–180.
Solid–liquid separation of animal slurry in theory and practice. A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXjs12ks7g%3D&md5=8356a924a7cba0527bd1ae168d13f192CAS |

Huszár H, Pogány A, Bozóki Z, Mohácsi Á, Horváth L, Szabó G (2008) Ammonia monitoring at ppb level using photoacoustic spectroscopy for environmental application. Sensors and Actuators. B, Chemical 134, 1027–1033.
Ammonia monitoring at ppb level using photoacoustic spectroscopy for environmental application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

IPCC (2013) ‘Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.’ (Eds TF Stocker, D Qin, GK Plattner, M Tignor, SK Allen, J Boschung, A Nauels, Y Xia, V Bex, PM Midgley) (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY) 1535 pp.

Jaggi RC, Aulakh MS, Sharma R (1999) Temperature effect on soil organic sulphur mineralization and elemental sulphur oxidation in subtropical soils of varying pH. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 54, 175–182.
Temperature effect on soil organic sulphur mineralization and elemental sulphur oxidation in subtropical soils of varying pH.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXktFCqur0%3D&md5=ad928d3c855468205afaf4a43ad36340CAS |

Jensen AO (2002) Changing the environment in swine buildings using sulfuric acid. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 45, 223–227.
Changing the environment in swine buildings using sulfuric acid.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jørgensen K, Jensen LS (2009) Chemical and biochemical variation in animal manure solids separated using different commercial separation technologies. Bioresource Technology 100, 3088–3096.
Chemical and biochemical variation in animal manure solids separated using different commercial separation technologies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19272772PubMed |

Kai P, Pedersen P, Jensen JE, Hansen MN, Sommer SG (2008) A whole-farm assessment of the efficacy of slurry acidification in reducing ammonia emissions. European Journal of Agronomy 28, 148–154.
A whole-farm assessment of the efficacy of slurry acidification in reducing ammonia emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlyrsbfJ&md5=ed61eea12e6a7cb4ef19c93f679072e9CAS |

Lin W-C, Chen Y-P, Tseng C-P (2012) Pilot-scale chemical–biological system for efficient H2S removal from biogas. Bioresource Technology 1355, 283–291.

Ndegwa PM, Hristov AN, Arogo J, Sheffield RE (2008) A review of ammonia emission mitigation techniques for concentrated animal feeding operations. Biosystems Engineering 100, 453–469.
A review of ammonia emission mitigation techniques for concentrated animal feeding operations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oenema O, Oudendag D, Velthof L (2007) Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union. Livestock Science 112, 261–272.
Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ottosen LDM, Poulsen HV, Nielsen DA, Finster K, Nielsen LP, Revsbech NP (2009) Observations on microbial activity in acidified pig slurry. Biosystems Engineering 102, 291–297.
Observations on microbial activity in acidified pig slurry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pain BF, Thompson RB, Rees YJ, Skinner JH (1990) Reducing gaseous losses of nitrogen from cattle slurry applied to grassland by the use of additives. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 50, 141–153.
Reducing gaseous losses of nitrogen from cattle slurry applied to grassland by the use of additives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXpslGjsQ%3D%3D&md5=f4a9a9b81105c45f16636198ae55eff6CAS |

Popovic O, Gioelli F, Dinuccio E, Balsari P (2014) Improved pig slurry mechanical separation using chitosan and biochar. Biosystems Engineering 127, 115–124.
Improved pig slurry mechanical separation using chitosan and biochar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ramos I, Fdz-Polanco M (2014) Microaerobic control of biogas sulphide content during sewage sludge digestion by using biogas production and hydrogen sulphide concentration. Chemical Engineering Journal 250, 303–311.
Microaerobic control of biogas sulphide content during sewage sludge digestion by using biogas production and hydrogen sulphide concentration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXovVKisbs%3D&md5=0da1aa6081d4a470b34115d8da9061ddCAS |

Roig A, Cayuela ML, Sanchez MA (2004) The use of elemental sulphur as organic alternative to control pH during composting of olive mill wastes. Chemosphere 57, 1099–1105.
The use of elemental sulphur as organic alternative to control pH during composting of olive mill wastes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXovVKntbc%3D&md5=7f73c1262261c5e67b8733d9f47ad3a5CAS | 15504468PubMed |

Sierra-Alvarez R, Beristan-Cardoso R, Salazar M, Gomez J, Razo-Florez E, Field JA (2007) Chemolithotrophic denitrification with elemental sulfur for groundwater treatment. Water Research 41, 1253–1262.
Chemolithotrophic denitrification with elemental sulfur for groundwater treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXitV2rur4%3D&md5=297a5ca76aa0a8a20b150cbe4ee6405fCAS | 17296214PubMed |

Sommer SG, Petersen SO, Sogaard HT (2000) Greenhouse gas emission from stored livestock slurry. Journal of Environmental Quality 29, 744–751.
Greenhouse gas emission from stored livestock slurry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXktFanu7w%3D&md5=a355f5151c6e921b493e2b1b28d6388cCAS |

Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ, Frost JP (1989) Effect of acidification with sulphuric acid on the volatilization of ammonia from cow and pig slurries. Cambridge Journal of Agricultural Science 113, 389–395.
Effect of acidification with sulphuric acid on the volatilization of ammonia from cow and pig slurries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXktVGitrk%3D&md5=a26cb1c555dc87a0a86a79d2200c8dd4CAS |

Tirol-Padre A, Rai M, Gathala M, Sharma S, Kumar V, Sharma PC, Sharma DK, Wassmann R, Ladha J (2014) Assessing the performance of the photo-acoustic infrared gas monitor for measuring CO2, N2O, and CH4 fluxes in two major cereal rotations. Global Change Biology 20, 287–299.
Assessing the performance of the photo-acoustic infrared gas monitor for measuring CO2, N2O, and CH4 fluxes in two major cereal rotations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23929733PubMed |

VDI 4630 (2006) Fermentation of organic materials, characterisation of substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests. VDI-Handbuch Energietechnik, Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

Wang K, Huang D, Ying H, Luo H (2014) Effects of acidification during storage on emissions of methane, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from digested pig slurry. Biosystems Engineering 122, 23–30.
Effects of acidification during storage on emissions of methane, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from digested pig slurry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXjtlyhurY%3D&md5=d34a64a2eb1a7b84f304253b432537fdCAS |