Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH FRONT

Emissions of nitrous oxide, ammonia and methane from Australian layer-hen manure storage with a mitigation strategy applied

T. A. Naylor A C , S. G. Wiedemann B , F. A. Phillips A , B. Warren B , E. J. McGahan B and C. M. Murphy B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

B FSA Consulting, PO Box 2175, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: naylort@uow.edu.au

Animal Production Science 56(9) 1367-1375 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15584
Submitted: 14 September 2015  Accepted: 22 December 2015   Published: 22 March 2016

Abstract

Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions are important environmental impacts from manure management in the layer-hen industry. The present study aimed to quantify emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4) and ammonia (NH3) from layer-hen manure stockpiles, and assess the use of an impermeable cover as an option to mitigate emissions. Gaseous emissions of N2O, CH4 and NH3 were measured using open-path FTIR spectroscopy and the emission strengths were inferred using a backward Lagrangian stochastic model. Emission factors were calculated from the relationship between gaseous emissions and stockpile inputs over a 32-day measurement period. Total NH3 emissions were 5.97 ± 0.399 kg/t (control) and 0.732 ± 0.116 kg/t (mitigation), representing an 88% reduction due to mitigation. Total CH4 emissions from the mitigation stockpile were 0.0832 ± 0.0198 kg/t. Methane emissions from the control and N2O emissions (control and mitigation) were below detection. The mass of each stockpile was 27 820 kg (control) and 25 120 kg (mitigation), with a surface area of ~68 m2 and a volume of ~19 m3. Total manure nitrogen (N) and volatile solids (VS) were 25.2 and 25.8 kg/t N, and 139 and 106 kg/t VS for the control and mitigation stockpiles respectively. Emission factors for NH3 were 24% and 3% of total N for the control and mitigation respectively. Methane from the mitigation stockpile had a CH4 conversion factor of 0.3%. The stockpile cover was found to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 74% compared with the control treatment, primarily via reduced NH3 and associated indirect N2O emissions.

Additional keywords: agriculture, bLs, GHG, manure, nitrogen, OP-FTIR.


References

Bai M (2011) Methane emissions from livestock measured by novel spectroscopic techniques. PhD Thesis, University of Wollongong, NSW.

Chadwick DR (2005) Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering. Atmospheric Environment 39, 787–799.
Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXktVChsg%3D%3D&md5=1d2887a218d4f0f89bbd5cff18d0fc82CAS |

Chadwick D, Sommer S, Thorman R, Fangueiro D, Cardenas L, Amon B, Misselbrook T (2011) Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 514–531.
Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Commonwealth of Australia (2014) Australian national greenhouse accounts: national inventory report 2012. Volume 1. Department of the Environment, Canberra.

DCCEE (2013) ‘National inventory report 2011. Vol. 1. The Australian Government submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.’ (Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency: Canberra) Available at http://www.climatechange.gov.au/en/publications/greenhouse-acctg/~/media/publications/greenhouse-acctg/NationalInventoryReport-2010-Vol-1.pdf [Verified 7 August 2015]

Dong H, Mangino J, McAllister TA, Hatfield JL, Johnson DE, Lassey KR, Aparecida de Lima M, Romanovskaya A, Bartram D, Gibb DJ, Martin JHJ (2006) Chapter 10. Emissions from livestock and manure management. In ‘IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Vol. 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use’. (Eds S Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara, K Tanabe) pp. 10.1–10.87. (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Kanagawa, Japan)

DSEWPaC (2013) ‘National pollutant inventory. Emission estimation technique manual for intensive livestock: poultry raising.’ (Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Australian Government: Canberra) Available at http://www.npi.gov.au/resource/emission-estimation-technique-manual-intensive-livestock-poultry-raising-version-30 [Verified 27 April 2015]

Flesch T, Wilson J, Harper L, Crenna B, Sharpe R (2004) Deducing ground-to-air emissions from observed trace gas concentrations: a field trial. Journal of Applied Meteorology 43, 487–502.
Deducing ground-to-air emissions from observed trace gas concentrations: a field trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flesch TK, Wilson JD, Harper LA (2005) Deducing ground-to-air emissions from observed trace gas concentrations: a field trial with wind disturbance. Journal of Applied Meteorology 44, 475–484.
Deducing ground-to-air emissions from observed trace gas concentrations: a field trial with wind disturbance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flesch TK, Harper LA, Desjardins RL, Gao Z, Crenna BP (2009) Multi-source emission determination using an inverse-dispersion technique. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 132, 11–30.
Multi-source emission determination using an inverse-dispersion technique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fukumoto Y, Osada T, Hananjima D, Haga K (2003) Patterns and quantities of NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions during swine manure composting without forced aeration-effect of compost pile scale. Bioresource Technology 89, 109–114.
Patterns and quantities of NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions during swine manure composting without forced aeration-effect of compost pile scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXivV2lu7c%3D&md5=4680f2f8bb8f419aa4e49e5600db8fd0CAS | 12699927PubMed |

Griffith DWT (1996) Synthetic calibration and quantitative analysis of gas-phase FT-IR spectra. Applied Spectroscopy 50, 59–70.
Synthetic calibration and quantitative analysis of gas-phase FT-IR spectra.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XlslGrsA%3D%3D&md5=e82f41f7b9835d74f7b31c18b090d154CAS |

Hansen MN, Henriksen K, Sommer SG (2006) Observations of production and emission of greenhouse gases and ammonia during storage of solids separated from pig slurry: effects of covering. Atmospheric Environment 40, 4172–4181.
Observations of production and emission of greenhouse gases and ammonia during storage of solids separated from pig slurry: effects of covering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlvFaru78%3D&md5=a8c9eb471a35d14b6747ec4d3ddd50c1CAS |

Harper LA, Sharpe RR, Parkin TB (2000) Gaseous nitrogen emissions from anaerobic swine lagoons: ammonia, nitrous oxide, and dinitrogen gas. Journal of Environmental Quality 29, 1356–1365.
Gaseous nitrogen emissions from anaerobic swine lagoons: ammonia, nitrous oxide, and dinitrogen gas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXlt1Wjt74%3D&md5=02a4d89d198001f93fde978c92744335CAS |

Harper LA, Flesch TK, Weaver KH, Wilson JD (2010) The effect of biofuel production on swine farm methane and ammonia emissions. Journal of Environmental Quality 39, 1984–1992.
The effect of biofuel production on swine farm methane and ammonia emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsVKlu73N&md5=c41e35883f792b424f2f6ea068bd3913CAS | 21284295PubMed |

Jones F, Phillips F, Naylor T, Mercer N (2011) Methane emissions from grazing Angus beef cows selected for divergent residual feed intake. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 302–307.
Methane emissions from grazing Angus beef cows selected for divergent residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Laubach J, Bai M, Pinares-Patiño CS, Phillips FA, Naylor TA, Molano G, Cárdenas Rocha EA, Griffith DWT (2013) Accuracy of micrometeorological techniques for detecting a change in methane emissions from a herd of cattle. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 176, 50–63.
Accuracy of micrometeorological techniques for detecting a change in methane emissions from a herd of cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li H, Xin H (2010) Lab-scale assessment of gaseous emissions from laying-hen manure storage as affected by physical and environmental factors. Transactions of the ASABE 53, 593–604.
Lab-scale assessment of gaseous emissions from laying-hen manure storage as affected by physical and environmental factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXns1Cgtrc%3D&md5=8dc9c1ff5add6b552c85182067122f72CAS |

Loyon L, Guiziou F, Saint Cast P (2008) Impact of manure management of different livestock on gaseous emissions: laboratory study. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 128–131.
Impact of manure management of different livestock on gaseous emissions: laboratory study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXovV2j&md5=4e0322e81de999da94119141452c915cCAS |

Mulbry W, Ahn H (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions during composting of dairy manure: influence of the timing of pile mixing on total emissions. Biosystems Engineering 126, 117–122.
Greenhouse gas emissions during composting of dairy manure: influence of the timing of pile mixing on total emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Phillips FA, Wiedemann SG, Naylor TA, McGahan EJ, Warren BR, Murphy CM, Parkes S, Wilson J (2016) Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from pigs housed on litter and from stockpiling of spent litter. Animal Production Science 56, 1390–1403.
Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from pigs housed on litter and from stockpiling of spent litter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Redding MR (2013) Bentonite can decrease ammonia volatilisation losses from poultry litter: laboratory studies. Animal Production Science 53, 1115–1118.
Bentonite can decrease ammonia volatilisation losses from poultry litter: laboratory studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhsVSgsb%2FM&md5=e8275d6ffac4437fb2b9be3969881e38CAS |

Sagoo E, Williams JR, Chambers BJ, Boyles LO, Matthews R, Chadwick DR (2007) Integrated management practices to minimise losses and maximise the crop nitrogen value of broiler litter. Biosystems Engineering 97, 512–519.
Integrated management practices to minimise losses and maximise the crop nitrogen value of broiler litter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shen Y, Ren L, Li G, Chen T, Guo R (2011) Influence of aeration on CH4, N2O and NH3 emissions during aerobic composting of a chicken manure and high C/N waste mixture. Waste Management 31, 33–38.
Influence of aeration on CH4, N2O and NH3 emissions during aerobic composting of a chicken manure and high C/N waste mixture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20888749PubMed |

Shepherd TA, Zhao Y, Li H, Stinn JP, Hayes MD, Xin H (2015) Environmental assessment of three egg production systems- Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions. Poultry Science 94, 534–543.
Environmental assessment of three egg production systems- Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2MngvFOrtQ%3D%3D&md5=e445efd18afb55f99422ff24729fa028CAS | 25737568PubMed |

Skiba U, Dimarco C, Hargreaves K, Sneath R, McCartney L (2006) Nitrous oxide emissions from a dung heap measured by chambers and plume methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112, 135–139.
Nitrous oxide emissions from a dung heap measured by chambers and plume methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xktl2mug%3D%3D&md5=3587a42d96c6faed3c7e44f998085a8bCAS |

Sommer SG, McGinn SM, Hao X, Larney FJ (2004) Techniques for measuring gas emissions from a composting stockpile of cattle manure. Atmospheric Environment 38, 4643–4652.
Techniques for measuring gas emissions from a composting stockpile of cattle manure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXlvFalt74%3D&md5=c65e8482d8f20d84d8721c2bd237d476CAS |

Sullivan CA, Madani A, Gordon RJ, Burton DL, Stratton GW (2009) Environmental impacts of mink manure and poultry litter stockpiling on air quality and water quality. pp. 2501–2519. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers annual international meeting 2009, ASABE. Available at http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-76449093771&partnerID=40&md5=72c73d3986bd8070a9db29c1c08217a1

Thorman RE, Chadwick DR, Boyles LO, Matthews R, Sagoo E, Harrison R (2006) Nitrous oxide emissions during storage of broiler litter and following application to arable land. International Congress Series 1293, 355–358.
Nitrous oxide emissions during storage of broiler litter and following application to arable land.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhs1amtbg%3D&md5=dba9a82ba9b6a60bb81c84523f47b063CAS |

Thorman RE, Chadwick DR, Harrison R, Boyles LO, Matthews R (2007) The effect on N2O emissions of storage conditions and rapid incorporation of pig and cattle farmyard manure into tillage land. Biosystems Engineering 97, 501–511.
The effect on N2O emissions of storage conditions and rapid incorporation of pig and cattle farmyard manure into tillage land.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Xin H, Gates RS, Green AR, Mitloehner FM, Moore PA, Wathes CM (2011) Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems. Poultry Science 90, 263–277.
Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M%2FmtFWlsw%3D%3D&md5=a0cc86e28d78a479df4755aa87bc8b47CAS | 21177468PubMed |