An evaluation of carbon offset supplementation options for beef production systems on coastal speargrass in central Queensland, Australia
D. Cottle A D , R. Eckard B , S. Bray C and M. Sullivan C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
C Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, PO Box 6014, Rockhampton MC, Qld 4702, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: david.cottle@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 56(3) 385-392 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15446
Submitted: 12 August 2015 Accepted: 25 November 2015 Published: 9 February 2016
Abstract
In 2014, the Australian Government implemented the Emissions Reduction Fund to offer incentives for businesses to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by following approved methods. Beef cattle businesses in northern Australia can participate by applying the ‘reducing GHG emissions by feeding nitrates to beef cattle’ methodology and the ‘beef cattle herd management’ methods. The nitrate (NO3) method requires that each baseline area must demonstrate a history of urea use. Projects earn Australian carbon credit units (ACCU) for reducing enteric methane emissions by substituting NO3 for urea at the same amount of fed nitrogen. NO3 must be fed in the form of a lick block because most operations do not have labour or equipment to manage daily supplementation. NO3 concentrations, after a 2-week adaptation period, must not exceed 50 g NO3/adult animal equivalent per day or 7 g NO3/kg dry matter intake per day to reduce the risk of NO3 toxicity. There is also a ‘beef cattle herd management’ method, approved in 2015, that covers activities that improve the herd emission intensity (emissions per unit of product sold) through change in the diet or management. The present study was conducted to compare the required ACCU or supplement prices for a 2% return on capital when feeding a low or high supplement concentration to breeding stock of either (1) urea, (2) three different forms of NO3 or (3) cottonseed meal (CSM), at N concentrations equivalent to 25 or 50 g urea/animal equivalent, to fasten steer entry to a feedlot (backgrounding), in a typical breeder herd on the coastal speargrass land types in central Queensland. Monte Carlo simulations were run using the software @risk, with probability functions used for (1) urea, NO3 and CSM prices, (2) GHG mitigation, (3) livestock prices and (4) carbon price. Increasing the weight of steers at a set turnoff month by feeding CSM was found to be the most cost-effective option, with or without including the offset income. The required ACCU prices for a 2% return on capital were an order of magnitude higher than were indicative carbon prices in 2015 for the three forms of NO3. The likely costs of participating in ERF projects would reduce the return on capital for all mitigation options.
Additional keywords: cottonseed meal, Emissions Reduction Fund, greenhouse gases, Monte Carlo simulation, nitrates.
References
Ash A, Hunt L, McDonald C, Scanlan J, Bell L, Cowley R, Watson I, McIvor J, MacLeod N (2015) Boosting the productivity and profitability of northern Australian beef enterprises: exploring innovation options using simulation modelling and systems analysis. Agricultural Systems 139, 50–65.| Boosting the productivity and profitability of northern Australian beef enterprises: exploring innovation options using simulation modelling and systems analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
BoM (2015) ‘Climate statistics for Australian locations.’ Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_039083.shtml [Verified 21 July 2015]
Bortolussi G, McIvor JG, Hodgkinson JJ, Coffey SG, Holmes CR (2005a) The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 1. Regional enterprise activity and structure. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1057–1073.
| The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 1. Regional enterprise activity and structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bortolussi G, McIvor JG, Hodgkinson JJ, Coffey SG, Holmes CR (2005b) The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 3. Annual liveweight gains from pasture based systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1093–1108.
| The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 3. Annual liveweight gains from pasture based systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bray S, Walsh D, Hoffmann M, Henry B, Eady S, Collier C, Pettit C, Navarro J, Corbet D (2015) ‘Desktop research project to provide data on liveweight and liveweight gain in the beef cattle sector in Queensland and the Northern Territory.’ (Department of Agriculture and Fisheries: Rockhampton, Qld)
Callaghan MJ, Tomkins NW, Benu I, Parker AJ (2014) How feasible is it to replace urea with nitrates to mitigate greenhouse gas emission from extensively managed beef cattle? Animal Production Science 54, 1300–1304.
CER (2015a) ‘Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by feeding nitrates to beef cattle.’ Available at http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/ERF/Choosing-a-project-type/Opportunities-for-the-land-sector/Agricultural-methods/Reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-Feeding-Nitrates-to-Beef-Cattle [Verified 21 July 2015]
CER (2015b) ‘Emissions Reduction Fund auction results factsheet.’ Available at http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/DocumentAssets/Pages/Emissions-Reduction-Fund-auction-results-factsheet-November-2015.aspx [Verified 4 December 2015]
Charmley E, Williams SRO, Moate PJ, Hegarty RS, Herd RM, Oddy VH, Reyenga P, Staunton KM, Anderson A, Hannah MC (2016) A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia. Animal Production Science in press.
Coates DB, Dixon RM (2008) Faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy estimates of diet quality and responses to nitrogen supplements by cattle grazing Bothriochloa pertusa pastures. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 829–834.
| Faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy estimates of diet quality and responses to nitrogen supplements by cattle grazing Bothriochloa pertusa pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXnsVGhtLo%3D&md5=fabf16716b492620c8289c45b31048b7CAS |
Cohn P (2015) ‘Can northern beef producers make money from the ERF?’ Future beef webinar. (RAMP carbon). Available at https://futurebeefnew-daff.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/Can-producers-make-money-from-the-ERF.pdf [Verified 10 August 2015]
Comlaw (2014) ‘Carbon credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) (reducing greenhouse gas emissions by feeding nitrates to beef cattle) methodology determination 2014.’ Available at https://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2014L01129 [Verified 10 August 2015]
Cottle DJ, Eckard R (2014) Modelling the reduction in enteric methane from voluntary intake versus controlled individual animal intake of lipid or nitrate supplements. Animal Production Science 54, 2121–2131.
Cottle DJ, Wyld R (2014) Multi-bin bunker systems to control delivery of supplements to individual grazing animals. In ‘Proceedings 17th symposium on precision agriculture Australasia’. (Ed. B Whelan) pp. 45–50. (University of Sydney: Sydney)
Cottle DJ, Nolan JV, Wiedemann SG (2011) Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review. Animal Production Science 51, 491–514.
| Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXntVGisLY%3D&md5=ca8409519db155f19af58311f9f4e1d4CAS |
CQLX (2015) ‘Central Queensland livestock exchange.’ Available at http://www.cqlx.com.au/reports.html [Verified 10 August 2015]
DAF (2015a) ‘Future beef. Land types.’ Available at http://www.futurebeef.com.au [Verified 10 August 2015]
DAF (2015b) ‘Breedcow and Dynama software.’ Available at https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/business-trade/business-and-trade-services/breedcow-and-dynama-software [Verified 21 July 2015]
Dixon RM (2011) A meta-analysis of the responses to non-protein nitrogen supplementation by cattle grazing native pastures in the seasonally dry tropics. Advances in Animal Biosciences 2, 336
Dixon RM (2013) Controlling voluntary intake of molasses-based supplements in grazing cattle. Animal Production Science 53, 217–225.
DoE (2015a) ‘About the Emissions Reduction Fund.’ Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction-fund/about [Verified 3 August 2015]
DoE (2015b) ‘Beef cattle herd management.’ Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction-fund/methods/beef-cattle-herd-management [Verified 21 July 2015]
Eckard RJ (1990) The relationship between the nitrogen and nitrate content and nitrate toxicity potential of Lolium multiflorum. Journal of the Grassland Society of South Africa 7, 174–178.
| The relationship between the nitrogen and nitrate content and nitrate toxicity potential of Lolium multiflorum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrison MT, McSweeney C, Tomkins NW, Eckard RJ (2015) Improving greenhouse gas emissions intensities of subtropical and tropical beef farming systems using Leucaena leucocephala. Agricultural Systems 136, 138–146.
| Improving greenhouse gas emissions intensities of subtropical and tropical beef farming systems using Leucaena leucocephala.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hennessy DW, Williamson PJ, Darnell RE (2000) Feed intake and liveweight responses to nitrogen and/or protein supplements by steers of Bos taurus, Bos indicus and Bos taurus × Bos indicus breed types offered a low quality grass hay. The Journal of Agricultural Science 135, 35–45.
| Feed intake and liveweight responses to nitrogen and/or protein supplements by steers of Bos taurus, Bos indicus and Bos taurus × Bos indicus breed types offered a low quality grass hay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holmes WE (2012) Breedcowplus software package, Version 6.0. Training Series QE99002. Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Townsville, Qld.
Hristov AN, Oh J, Giallongoa F, Frederick TW, Harper MT, Weeks HL, Branco AF, Moate PJ, Deighton MH, Williams SRO, Kindermann M, Duvale S (2015) An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 10 663–10 668.
| An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXht1GrsL3P&md5=1c3d9175995aea8695a264f3f1772926CAS |
Hulshof RBA, Berndt A, Gerrits WJJ, Dijkstra J, van Zijderveld SM, Newbold JR, Perdok HB (2015) Dietary nitrate supplementation reduces methane emission in beef cattle fed sugarcane-based diets. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2317–2323.
| Dietary nitrate supplementation reduces methane emission in beef cattle fed sugarcane-based diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Landmark (2015) ‘Benchmark.’ Available at http://photos.harcourts.com.au/Harcourts.Public.WebTemplates/602/Files/CL_LandmarkHarcourts_BenchmarkReport_SeventhEd_web-2.jpg [Verified 25 September 2015]
Leng RA (2008) The potential of feeding nitrate to reduce enteric methane production in ruminants. A report to the Department of Climate Change. Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra. Available at http://www.penambulbooks.com/Downloads/Leng-FinalModified2017-9-2008.pdf [Verified 10 August 2015]
McCown RL (1980–1981) The climatic potential for beef cattle production in tropical Australia: part 1 – simulating the annual cycle of liveweight change. Agricultural Systems 6, 303–317.
| The climatic potential for beef cattle production in tropical Australia: part 1 – simulating the annual cycle of liveweight change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGowan MR, McCosker KD, Fordyce G, Smith DR, O’Rourke PK, Perkins N, Barnes T, Marquart L, Morton J, Newsome T, Menzies D, Burns BM, Jephcott S (2014) Northern Australian beef fertility project: CashCow. B.NBP.0382. Final report prepared for Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney.
McLean I, Holmes P, Counsell D (2014) The northern beef report 2013. Northern beef situation analysis. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney.
McLennan SR (2004) More effective supplements for the northern beef industry. Project number NAP3.122. Final report prepared for Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney.
McLennan SR (2014) Optimising growth paths of beef cattle in northern Australia for increased profitability. B.NBP.0391. Final report prepared for Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney.
Monjardino M, MacLeod N, McKellar L, Prestwidge D (2015) Economic evaluation of irrigated forage production in a beef cattle operation in the semi-arid tropics of northern Australia. Agricultural Systems 139, 122–143.
| Economic evaluation of irrigated forage production in a beef cattle operation in the semi-arid tropics of northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Murphy K (1995) ‘Beef production systems.’ (Tropical Beef Centre: Rockhampton, Qld)
Palisade (2015) ‘@risk.’ Available at http://www.palisade.com/risk/ [Verified 21 July 2015]
Poppi DP, McLennan SR (1995) Protein and energy utilization by ruminants at pasture. Journal of Animal Science 73, 278–290.
Risco CA, Holmberg CA, Kutches A (1992) Effect of graded concentrations of gossypol on calf performance: toxicological and pathological considerations. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2787–2798.
| Effect of graded concentrations of gossypol on calf performance: toxicological and pathological considerations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXnvFKnsQ%3D%3D&md5=c1435338d03c360625881d01d16fc524CAS | 1430484PubMed |
Tothill JC, Gillies C (1992) ‘The pasture lands of northern Australia.’ Occasional publication no. 5. (Tropical Grassland Society of Australia: Brisbane)
UNFCCC (2015) ‘National inventory submissions 2015.’ Available at https://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_ghg_inventories/national_inventories_submissions/items/8812.php [Verified 21 July 2015]
Ungerfeld EM, Kohn RA (2006) The role of thermodynamics in the control of ruminal fermentation. In ‘Ruminant physiology’. (Eds K Sejrsen, T Hvelplund, MO Nielsen) pp. 55–85. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands)
van Zijderveld SM, Gerrits WJJ, Dijkstra J, Newbold JR, Hulshof RBA, Perdok HB (2011) Persistency of methane mitigation by dietary nitrate supplementation in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4028–4038.
| Persistency of methane mitigation by dietary nitrate supplementation in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXpsVylur4%3D&md5=4b50ef913e6ff901e51ebf368f5f53b0CAS | 21787938PubMed |
