Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Meal pattern analysis for effects of compound feed formulation in mid to late lactating dairy cows fed hay and compound feed both ad libitum

F. Leen A B C , A. Navarro-Villa B , R. Fowers B , J. Martín-Tereso B and W. F. Pellikaan A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.

B Nutreco R&D, PO Box 220, 5830 AE, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.

C Corresponding author. Email: frederik.leen@ilvo.vlaanderen.be

Animal Production Science 54(10) 1752-1756 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14361
Submitted: 13 March 2014  Accepted: 26 June 2014   Published: 19 August 2014

Abstract

The Kempen System is a dairy feeding system allowing ad libitum access to pelleted compound feed (CF) and hay. This system allows high DM intake (DMI) up to 30 kg DM (80% CF), but small and frequent CF meals are essential to reduce negative ruminal pH fluctuations. Little is known about feed intake patterns of cows on ad libitum and separated access to CF and hay. Meal pattern analysis was performed to evaluate feed intake behaviour of two different isoenergetic and isonitrogenous CF (starch vs fibre), contrasting in neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre and starch content. Twenty primi- and multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows (203 ± 35.4 days in milk) received grass hay ad libitum with one of the two CF also offered ad libitum. Meal criteria, the shortest non-feeding interval between feeding events separating two consecutive meals, were used to cluster feeding events into separate meals. The meal criteria were determined per cow by fitting the log10-transformed feeding intervals to Gaussian–Gaussian probability density functions. The DMI of CF fibre (18.8 ± 0.54 kg) tended to be greater (P = 0.09) than starch (18.1 ± 0.54 kg/day), while that of grass hay (4.8 ± 0.29 kg) was unaffected (P = 0.23). The CF meal size did not differ (P = 0.26) between treatments (starch 2.9 vs fibre 3.0 ± 0.11 kg/meal), but number of meals per day (6.36 ± 0.229, P = 0.87) and meal durations (64 ± 3.5 min, P = 0.87) did not differ between treatments. The differences in CF formulation were insufficient to create detectable differences in feed intake nor intake behaviour patterns.

Additional keywords: dairy cow, feed intake behaviour, high-concentrate diet, meal criterion.


References

Abrahamse PA, Vlaeminck B, Tamminga S, Dijkstra J (2008) The effect of silage and concentrate type on intake behavior, rumen function, and milk production in dairy cows in early and late lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4778–4792.
The effect of silage and concentrate type on intake behavior, rumen function, and milk production in dairy cows in early and late lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVKgtrjJ&md5=deacd453e535c02d99a4d19db506b4b1CAS | 19038953PubMed |

Allen MS (2000) Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 1598–1624.
Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXltVGgtb0%3D&md5=7817d0d67447a47c4db4f9aca64b3833CAS | 10908065PubMed |

Allen MS, Bradford BJ, Oba M (2009) Board-invited review: the hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3317–3334.
Board-invited review: the hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1WksLzL&md5=e9dc4f18b330d72eb28c4ecfb59a35ffCAS | 19648500PubMed |

Beauchemin KA, Eriksen L, Nørgaard P, Rode LM (2008) Salivary secretion during meals in lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2077–2081.
Salivary secretion during meals in lactating dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXltlWmu74%3D&md5=cabe470b00577946c7668577245a92f5CAS | 18420637PubMed |

Craninx M, Steen A, van Laar H, van Nespen T, Martin-Tereso J, de Baets B, Fievez V (2008) Effect of lactation stage on the odd- and branched-chain milk fatty acids of dairy cattle under grazing and indoor conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2662–2677.
Effect of lactation stage on the odd- and branched-chain milk fatty acids of dairy cattle under grazing and indoor conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXot1Ols7g%3D&md5=7fc8f92f43c73fda3aa64095dbd4c8dcCAS | 18565925PubMed |

CVB (2012) ‘Tabellenboek Veevoeding 2012, Voedernormen landbouwhuisdieren en voederwaarde veevoeders.’ (CVB Productschap Diervoeder: The Hague, The Netherlands)

DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM, Beauchemin KA (2003) Measuring the feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows in early to peak lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3354–3361.
Measuring the feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows in early to peak lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXotFOjt78%3D&md5=b6318ffd4e840d4dbee2319a60b8113fCAS | 14594255PubMed |

González LA, Manteca X, Calsamiglia S, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Ferret A (2012) Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review). Animal Feed Science and Technology 172, 66–79.
Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Görgülü M, Boğa M, Şahin A, Serbester U, Kutlu HR, Şahinler S (2008) Diet selection and eating behaviour of lactating goats subjected to time restricted feeding in choice and single feeding system. Small Ruminant Research 78, 41–47.
Diet selection and eating behaviour of lactating goats subjected to time restricted feeding in choice and single feeding system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Görgülü M, Akyol MA, Boğa M, Goncu S (2012) The effects of choice feeding and season on the feeding behaviour and growth performance of calves. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 21, 263–275.

Greter AM, von Keyserlingk MA, DeVries TJ (2012) Ration composition affects short-term diurnal feeding patterns of dairy heifers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 140, 16–24.
Ration composition affects short-term diurnal feeding patterns of dairy heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huntington GB (1997) Starch utilization by ruminants: from basics to the bunk. Journal of Animal Science 75, 852–867.

Huzzey JM, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM (2005) Changes in feeding, drinking, and standing behavior of dairy cows during the transition period. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2454–2461.
Changes in feeding, drinking, and standing behavior of dairy cows during the transition period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXlsFCmsLc%3D&md5=95d1f4a995ec2f0ccbee81d89cf08ae1CAS | 15956308PubMed |

Kaufmann W (1976) Influence of the composition of the ration and the feeding frequency on pH-regulation in the rumen and on feed intake in ruminants. Livestock Production Science 3, 103–114.
Influence of the composition of the ration and the feeding frequency on pH-regulation in the rumen and on feed intake in ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE28XlsVWlsrw%3D&md5=1771a6cf3d2cd03746ad1058da8c1a23CAS |

Melin M, Wiktorsson H, Norell L (2005) Analysis of feeding and drinking patterns of dairy cows in two cow traffic situations in automatic milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 71–85.
Analysis of feeding and drinking patterns of dairy cows in two cow traffic situations in automatic milking systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXms1yj&md5=399a8b7fd1bc042e9285543a482f5302CAS | 15591369PubMed |

Miron J, Yosef E, Nikbachat M, Zenou A, Maltz E, Halachmi I, Ben-Ghedalia D (2004) Feeding behavior and performance of dairy cows fed pelleted nonroughage fiber byproducts. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 1372–1379.
Feeding behavior and performance of dairy cows fed pelleted nonroughage fiber byproducts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjvF2js70%3D&md5=21f675a0b3d83dc255359c2e2e0e9a0aCAS | 15290984PubMed |

Tamminga S, van Straalen WM, Subnel APJ, Meijer RGM, Steg A, Wever CJG, Blok MC (1994) The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Science 40, 139–155.
The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tolkamp BJ, Kyriazakis I (1997) Measuring diet selection in dairy cows: effect of training on choice of dietary protein level. Animal Science 64, 197–207.
Measuring diet selection in dairy cows: effect of training on choice of dietary protein level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tolkamp BJ, Allcroft DJ, Austin EJ, Nielsen BL, Kyriazakis I (1998) Satiety splits feeding behaviour into bouts. Journal of Theoretical Biology 194, 235–250.
Satiety splits feeding behaviour into bouts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9778436PubMed |

Tolkamp BJ, Schweitzer DPN, Kyriazakis I (2000) The biologically relevant unit for the analysis of short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2057–2068.
The biologically relevant unit for the analysis of short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmvFKit7g%3D&md5=49941209f04788dd724c91f6b0971907CAS | 11003239PubMed |

Tolkamp BJ, Friggens NC, Emmans GC, Kyriazakis I, Oldham JD (2002) Meal patterns of dairy cows consuming mixed foods with a high or a low ratio of concentrate to grass silage. Journal of Animal Science 74, 369–382.

Van Es AJH (1975) Feed evaluation for dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 2, 95–107.
Feed evaluation for dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yeates MP, Tolkamp BJ, Allcroft DJ, Kyriazakis I (2001) The use of mixed distribution models to determine bout criteria for analysis of animal behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 213, 413–425.
The use of mixed distribution models to determine bout criteria for analysis of animal behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnpt1ejtQ%3D%3D&md5=779880e9897077caa5d0c1d89bd74063CAS | 11735288PubMed |