Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Factors affecting antler investment in Iberian red deer

J. A. Gómez A E , F. Ceacero B C , T. Landete-Castillejos A B D , E. Gaspar-López A , A. J. García A B D and L. Gallego B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Grupo de Recursos Cinegéticos, Instituto de Desarrollo Regional (IDR), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), 02071 Albacete, Spain.

B Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología Agroforestal y Genética, ETSIA, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), 02071 Albacete, Spain.

C Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Praha 10-Uhříněves, Czech Republic.

D Animal Science Tech. Applied to Wildlife Management Research Group, IREC Section Albacete, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (UCLM–CSIC–JCCM), Campus UCLM, 02071 Albacete, Spain.

E Corresponding author. Email: jagomezn@jccm.es

Animal Production Science 52(9) 867-873 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11316
Submitted: 18 November 2011  Accepted: 8 March 2012   Published: 12 July 2012

Abstract

Antler constitutes such a costly trait that the skeleton of the deer undergoes a process similar to osteoporosis to meet the high demands of mineral deposition in the antler. The allometric relationship between antler and body size is one of the oldest known. However, no study has assessed the proportion that antlers constitute with regard to the skeleton (from which most of the material is drawn), nor which factors influence this investment. To assess this, we studied 171 males (aged 1–5 years), determined their antler and bodyweights and scored their body condition. Then we calculated antler investment as antler weight relative to estimated skeletal weight. Results showed that antler investment in males ≥2 years old (i.e. excluding yearlings) depended on age rather than the whole bodyweight or body condition. Antler investment increased from 6% in yearlings to 35% in 5-year-old males, with a mean of 19%. A GLMM showed that in males ≥2 years old, within age, the heavier the male and the better the body condition at the start of antler growth, the greater the investment in antlers. In yearlings, antler investment did not depend on bodyweight or body condition. In conclusion, antler weight relative to skeleton weight is a good method to assess antler investment. This investment is influenced by age and, in males ≥2 years old, also by bodyweight or condition at the start of antler growth.

Additional keywords: allometry, body resources, bone, male red deer, Spain.


References

Andersson M (1982) Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 17, 375–393.
Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Andersson M (1994) ‘Sexual selection.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ)

Appleby MC (1980) Social rank and food access in red deer stags. Behaviour 74, 294–309.
Social rank and food access in red deer stags.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arman P, Hamilton WJ, Sharman GAM (1978) Observations on the calving of free-ranging tame red deer. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54, 279–283.
Observations on the calving of free-ranging tame red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE1M%2FntVSjtA%3D%3D&md5=a643268592311ba3ce000d64e3cfc1faCAS |

ASAB (2008) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioral research and teaching. Animal Behaviour 75, II–XII.
Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioral research and teaching.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Asdell SA (1946) ‘Patterns of mammalian reproduction.’ (Comstock: Ithaca, NY)

Ashley EP, McCullough GB, Robinson JT (1998) Morphological responses of white-tailed deer to a severe population reduction. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76, 1–5.
Morphological responses of white-tailed deer to a severe population reduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Audigé L, Wilson PR, Morris RS (1998) A body condition score system and its use for farmed red deer hinds. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 545–553.
A body condition score system and its use for farmed red deer hinds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ball AJ, Thompson JM, Fennessy PF (1994) Relationship between velvet antler weight and liveweight in red deer (Cervus elaphus). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 153–157.
Relationship between velvet antler weight and liveweight in red deer (Cervus elaphus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrette C, Vandal D (1986) Social rank, dominance, antler size, and access to food in snow-bound wild woodland caribou. Behaviour 97, 118–145.
Social rank, dominance, antler size, and access to food in snow-bound wild woodland caribou.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bartoš L, Bubenik GA (2011) Relationships between rank-related behaviour, antler cycle timing and antler growth in deer: behavioural aspects. Animal Production Science 51, 303–310.

Bartoš L, Perner V, Losos S (1988) Red deer stag rank position, body weight and antler growth. Acta Theriologica 33, 209–217.

Bartoš L, Bubenik GA, Kuzmova E (2012) Endocrine relationships between rank-related behavior and antler growth in deer. Frontiers in Bioscience E4, 1111–1126.
Endocrine relationships between rank-related behavior and antler growth in deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baxter BJ, Andrews RN, Barrell GK (1999) Bone turnover associated with antler growth in red deer (Cervus elaphus). The Anatomical Record 256, 14–19.
Bone turnover associated with antler growth in red deer (Cervus elaphus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzos1Gntg%3D%3D&md5=2593dcb284a2a7d719a989faee0388feCAS |

Blaxter KL, Kay RNB, Sharman GAM, Cunningham JMM, Hamilton WJ (1974) ‘Farming the red deer.’ (Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: Edinburgh, UK)

Brelurut A, Pingard A, Thériez M (1990) ‘Le Cerf Et Son Élevage.’ (INRA: Paris)

Carrión D, García AJ, Gaspar-López E, Landete-Castillejos T, Gallego L (2008) Development of body condition in hinds of Iberian red deer during gestation and its effects on calf birth weight and milk production. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 309A, 1–10.

Ceacero F, Landete-Castillejos T, García AJ, Estévez JA, Gallego L (2010) Effects of ad libitum mineral consumption in Iberian red deer hinds and calves. Animal Production Science 50, 37–44.
Effects of ad libitum mineral consumption in Iberian red deer hinds and calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsFOms7jN&md5=a048290ea74cffdc21cf610590624d44CAS |

Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Gibson RM, Guinness FE (1979) The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Animal Behaviour 27, 211–225.
The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) ‘Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes’. (Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK)

Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1988) Reproductive success in male and female red deer. In ‘Reproductive success’. (Ed. TH Clutton-Brock) pp. 325–343. (The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL)

Currey JD, Landete-Castillejos T, Estévez JA, Ceacero F, Olguín A, García AJ, Gallego L (2009) The mechanical properties of red deer antler bone when used in fighting. The Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 3985–3993.
The mechanical properties of red deer antler bone when used in fighting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MjovFWmtg%3D%3D&md5=9998a9e983df6a0e92e0f12bef89d6afCAS |

Espmark Y (1964) Studies in dominance-subordination relationship in a group of semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.). Animal Behaviour 12, 420–426.
Studies in dominance-subordination relationship in a group of semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fennessy PF, Thomson JM, Suttie JM (1991) Season and growth strategy in red deer. Evolutionary implications and nutritional management. In ‘Wildlife production: conservation and sustainable development’. (Eds IA Renecker, RJ Hudson) pp. 495–501. (University of Alaska: Fairbanks, AK)

Gaspar-López E, García AJ, Landete-Castillejos T, Carrión D, Estévez JA, Gallego L (2008) Growth of the first antler in Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). European Journal of Wildlife Research 54, 1–5.
Growth of the first antler in Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gaspar-López E, Landete-Castillejos T, Estévez JA, Ceacero F, Gallego L, García AJ (2010) Biometrics, testosterone, cortisol and antler growth cycle in Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Reproduction in Domestic Animals 45, 243–249.
Biometrics, testosterone, cortisol and antler growth cycle in Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gilbert SF, Epel D (2009) ‘Ecological developmental biology: integrating epigenetics, medicine, and evolution.’ (Sinauer: Sunderland, MA)

Gómez JA (2004) Crecimiento corporal y desarrollo de la cuerna hasta los dos años y medio de vida en el ciervo ibérico (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Factores condicionantes. PhD Thesis, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.

Gómez JA, Landete-Castillejos T, García AJ, Gallego L (2006) Importance of growth during lactation on body size and antler development in the Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Livestock Science 105, 27–34.
Importance of growth during lactation on body size and antler development in the Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grace ND, Castillo-Alcalá F, Wilson PR (2008) Amounts and distribution of mineral elements associated with liveweight gains of grazing red deer (Cervus elaphus). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 439–449.
Amounts and distribution of mineral elements associated with liveweight gains of grazing red deer (Cervus elaphus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXisFertLk%3D&md5=21a2b71d34eb7fb3321f97e7de16873aCAS |

Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1978) Factors affecting calf mortality in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 817–832.
Factors affecting calf mortality in red deer (Cervus elaphus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harvey PH, Bradbury JW (1991) Sexual selection. In ‘Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach’. (Eds JR Krebs, NB Davies) pp. 203–233. (Blackwell Scientific: Oxford, UK)

Huxley J (1931) The relative size of antlers of deer. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1931, 819–864.

Hyvärinen H, Kay RNB, Hamilton WJ (1977) Variation in the weight, specific gravity and composition of the antlers of red deer (Cervus elaphus L). The British Journal of Nutrition 38, 301–311.
Variation in the weight, specific gravity and composition of the antlers of red deer (Cervus elaphus L).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kozłowski J (1992) Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7, 15–19.
Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kruuk LEB, Slate J, Pemberton JM, Brotherstone S, Guinness F, Clutton-Brock T (2002) Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution 56, 1683–1695.

Landete-Castillejos T, García A, Gallego L (2001) Calf growth in captive Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus): effect of birth date and hind milk production and composition. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1085–1092.

Landete-Castillejos T, Garcia AJ, Gallego L (2007a) Body weight, early growth and antler size influence antler bone mineral composition of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Bone 40, 230–235.
Body weight, early growth and antler size influence antler bone mineral composition of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xht12ktrvE&md5=690c7f1031d9a82b5f18bec3ada56010CAS |

Landete-Castillejos T, Estevez JA, Martínez A, Ceacero F, Garcia AJ, Gallego L (2007b) Does chemical composition of antler bone reflect the physiological effort made to grow it? Bone 40, 1095–1102.
Does chemical composition of antler bone reflect the physiological effort made to grow it?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjtVaksbs%3D&md5=d67fadf152952a606003ba921323504dCAS |

Landete-Castillejos T, Currey JD, Estevez JA, Gaspar-López E, García AJ, Gallego L (2007c) Influence of physiological effort of growth and chemical composition on antler bone mechanical properties. Bone 41, 794–803.
Influence of physiological effort of growth and chemical composition on antler bone mechanical properties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtF2htbzO&md5=90ab9ba5b1250ddae9c373f414edc3c5CAS |

Landete-Castillejos T, Currey JD, Estevez JA, Fierro Y, Calatayud A, Ceacero F, Garcia AJ, Gallego L (2010) Do drastic weather effects on diet influence changes in chemical composition, mechanical properties and structure in deer antlers? Bone 47, 815–825.
Do drastic weather effects on diet influence changes in chemical composition, mechanical properties and structure in deer antlers?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtFClsb3K&md5=7dc2be49775aa149de3aa384fb76db23CAS |

Landete-Castillejos T, Currey JD, Ceacero F, García AJ, Gallego L, Gomez S (2012a) Does nutrition affect bone porosity and mineral tissue distribution in deer antlers? The relationship between histology, mechanical properties and mineral composition. Bone 50, 245–254.
Does nutrition affect bone porosity and mineral tissue distribution in deer antlers? The relationship between histology, mechanical properties and mineral composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xht1Clsw%3D%3D&md5=4c65cb6f7b2f96e96f24a6fa61fb6b42CAS |

Landete-Castillejos T, Estevez JA, Ceacero F, Garcia AJ, Gallego L (2012b) A review of factors affecting antler composition and mechanics. Frontiers in Bioscience E4, 2328–2339.

Landete-Castillejos T, Molina-Quilez I, Estevez F, Ceacero JA, Garcia AJ, Gallego L (2012c) Alternative hypothesis for the origin of osteoporosis: the role of Mn. Frontiers in Bioscience E4, 1385–1390.
Alternative hypothesis for the origin of osteoporosis: the role of Mn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lincoln GA (1971) Puberty in a seasonally breeding male the red deer stag (Cervus elaphus L.). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 25, 41–54.
Puberty in a seasonally breeding male the red deer stag (Cervus elaphus L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE3M7lslGmug%3D%3D&md5=3d30289f372bd8ab04b93d5c2923069cCAS |

McCullough DR (1982) Antler characteristics of George Reserve deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management 46, 821–826.
Antler characteristics of George Reserve deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Montoya JM (1999) ‘El ciervo y el monte. Manejo y conservación.’ (Coediciones Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar/Mundi-prensa: Madrid)

Moore GH, Littlejohn RP, Cowie GM (1988) Factors affecting liveweight gain in red deer calves from birth to weaning. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 279–283.
Factors affecting liveweight gain in red deer calves from birth to weaning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muir PD, Sykes AR, Barrell GK (1985) Mineralization during antler growth in red deer. In ‘Biology of deer production. Royal Society of New Zealand, Bulletin no. 22’. (Eds PF Fennessy, KR Drew) pp. 251–254. (Royal Society of New Zealand: Wellington)

Muir PD, Sykes AR, Barrell GK (1987) Calcium metabolism in red deer (Cervus elaphus) offered herbages during antlerogenesis: kinetic and stable balance studies. Journal of Agricuture Science Cambrigde 109, 357–364.
Calcium metabolism in red deer (Cervus elaphus) offered herbages during antlerogenesis: kinetic and stable balance studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXjs1GgsQ%3D%3D&md5=77b084287120a43c4a91b1e60f0e6230CAS |

Pélabon C, van Breukelen L (1998) Asymmetry in antler size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): an index of individual and population conditions. Oecologia 116, 1–8.
Asymmetry in antler size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): an index of individual and population conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rerabek J, Bubenik AB (1963) ‘The metabolism of phosphorus and iodine in deer.’ Translation Series AEC-tr-5631. (US Atomic Energy Commission)

Rue LL (2004) ‘The encyclopedia of deer.’ (Voyageur Press: Stillwater, MN)

Schmidt KT, Stien A, Albon SD, Guinness FE (2001) Antler length of yearling red deer is determined by population density, weather and early life-history. Oecologia 127, 191–197.
Antler length of yearling red deer is determined by population density, weather and early life-history.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schröder J (1983) Antler and body weight allometry in red deer: a comparison of statistical estimators. Biometrical Journal 25, 669–680.

Smith MH, Chesser RK, Cothran EG, Johns PE (1982) Genetic variability and antler growth in a natural population of white-tailed deer. In ‘Antler development in Cervidae’. (Ed. RD Brown) pp. 365–387. (Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute: Kingsville, TX)

Solberg EJ, Sæther BE (1994) Male traits in life-history variables: annual variation in body mass antler size in moose (Alces alces). Journal of Mammalogy 75, 1069–1079.
Male traits in life-history variables: annual variation in body mass antler size in moose (Alces alces).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Suttie JM (1980) The effect of antler removal on dominance and fighting behavior in farmed red deer stags. Journal of Zoology 190, 217–224.
The effect of antler removal on dominance and fighting behavior in farmed red deer stags.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Suttie JM, Kay RNB (1982) The influence of nutrition and photoperiod on the growth of antlers of young red deer. In ‘Antler development in Cervidae’. (Ed. RD Brown) pp. 61–71. (Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute: Kingsville, TX)

Suttie JM, Wenham G, Kay RNB (1984) Influence of winter feed restriction and summer compensation on skeletal development in red deer stags (Cervus elaphus). Research in Veterinary Science 36, 183–186.

Techawiboonwong A, Song HK, Leonard MB, Wehrli RW (2008) Cortical bone water: in vivo quantification with ultrashort eco-time MR imaging. Radiology 248, 824–833.
Cortical bone water: in vivo quantification with ultrashort eco-time MR imaging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ullrey DE (1982) Nutrition and antler development in white-tailed deer. In ‘Antler development in Cervidae’. (Ed. RD Brown) pp. 49–58. (Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute: Kingsville, TX)

Wallace V, Davies AS (1985) Pre- and post-rut body composition of red deer stags. In ‘Biology of deer production. Royal Society of New Zealand, Bulletin no. 22’. (Eds PF Fennessy, KR Drew) pp. 291–293. (Royal Society of New Zealand: Wellington)