Predicting the quality of browse-containing diets fed to sheep using faecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy
M. B. P. Kumara Mahipala A B E , G. L. Krebs C , P. McCafferty D , T. Naumovski D , K. Dods D and R. Stephens DA School of Agriculture and Environment, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.
B Present address: Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
C E. H. Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.
D ChemCentre, 126 Hay Street, East Perth, WA 6004, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: pmahi@pdn.ac.lk
Animal Production Science 50(10) 925-930 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09141
Submitted: 27 October 2009 Accepted: 23 July 2010 Published: 21 October 2010
Abstract
The potential of data collected from past feeding trials to derive faecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (fNIRS) calibrations for predicting the attributes of browse-containing sheep diets was examined. Reference data and faecal near-infrared spectrum pairs (n = 240) originated from five feeding trials involving 40 diets consisting of varying levels of fresh browse and oaten chaff. The fNIRS calibrations were developed to predict crude protein (CP), total phenolics (TP), total tannin (TT) and phosphorus (P) contents, protein precipitation capacity of tannin (PPC), in vivo digestibility of dry matter (DMD), organic matter (OMD) and crude protein (CPD) and in vitro OMD (IVOMD), metabolisable energy (ME) and short chain fatty acid production (eSCFA) in the diet. The precision of calibrations was evaluated by the coefficient of determination (R2c) and standard error (SEC) of calibration. The predictive ability of calibrations was evaluated by standard error of cross-validation (SECV), standard error of prediction (SEP), slope of the validation regression and the ratio of the standard deviation of the reference data to the SECV (RPD). For all fNIRS calibrations, R2c was >0.80 and SEC was close to the respective SECV. Slope of the validation regressions did not deviate from 1 for chemical attributes but deviated from 1 for functional attributes (except eSCFA). The RPD of DMD and OMD was <3, whereas the ratio was >3 for CP, TP, TT, PPC, P, CPD, IVOMD, ME and eSCFA calibrations. Data derived from the past feeding trials could be used to derive robust fNIRS calibrations to predict chemical attributes (CP, TP, TT, PPC, P) of browse-containing sheep diets. Although, fNIRS calibrations predicting dietary in vitro functional properties (digestibility and ME) were superior to those predicting in vivo functional properties, both were not so robust. Statistics of fNIRS calibrations derived using reference data originating from in vitro methods needs to be carefully interpreted.
Additional keywords: crude protein, digestibility, metabolisable energy, tannins.
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), Chemistry Centre (WA), and Curtin University of Technology.
Boval M,
Coats DB,
Lecomte P,
Decruyenaere V, Archimede H
(2004) Faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to assess chemical composition, in vivo digestibility and intake of tropical grass by Creole cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 19–29.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Decruyenaere V,
Lecomte P,
Demarquilly C,
Aufrere J,
Dardenne P,
Stilmant D, Buldgen A
(2009) Evaluation of green forage intake and digestibility in ruminants using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): developing a global calibration. Animal Feed Science and Technology 148, 138–156.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Hill JO,
Coates DB,
Whitbread AM,
Clem RL,
Robertson MJ, Pengelly BC
(2009) Seasonal changes in pasture quality and diet selection and their relationship with liveweight gain of steers grazing tropical grass and grass–legume pastures in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 49, 983–993.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huston JE,
Rector BS,
Ellis WC, Allen ML
(1986) Dynamics of digestion in cattle, sheep, goats and deer. Journal of Animal Science 62, 208–215.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Landau S,
Glasser T,
Dvash L, Perevolotsky A
(2004) Faecal NIRS to monitor the diet of Mediterranean goats. South African Journal of Animal Science 34(5), 76–80.
Landau S,
Glasser T,
Muklada H,
Dvash L,
Perevolotsky A,
Ungar ED, Walker JW
(2005) Fecal NIRS prediction of dietary protein percentage and in vitro dry matter digestibility in diets ingested by goats in Mediterranean scrubland. Small Ruminant Research 59, 251–263.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Landau S,
Glasser T, Dvash L
(2006) Monitoring nutrition in small ruminants with the aid of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) technology. Small Ruminant Research 61, 1–11.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Landau S,
Giger-Reverdin S,
Rapetti L,
Dvash L,
Dorleans M, Ungar ED
(2008) Data mining old digestibility trials for nutritional monitoring in confined goats with aids of fecal near infra-red spectroscopy. Small Ruminant Research 77, 146–158.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lefroy EC,
Dann PR,
Wildin JH,
Wesley-Smith RN, McGowan AA
(1992) Trees and shrubs as sources of fodder in Australia. Agroforestry Systems 20, 117–139.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leite ER, Stuth JW
(1995) Fecal NIRS equations to assess diet quality of free-ranging goats. Small Ruminant Research 15, 223–230.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Li H,
Tolleson D,
Stuth J,
Bai K,
Mo F, Kronberg S
(2007) Faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict diet quality for sheep. Small Ruminant Research 68, 263–268.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lyons RK, Stuth JW
(1992) Fecal NIRS equations for predicting diet quality of free-ranging cattle. Journal of Range Management 45, 238–244.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lyons RK,
Stuth JW, Angerer JP
(1995) Technical note: fecal NIRS equation validation. Journal of Range Management 48, 380–382.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McQuaker NR,
Brown DF, Kluckner PD
(1979) Digestion of environmental materials for analysis by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 51, 1082–1084.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Menke KH, Steingas H
(1988) Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analyses and in vitro production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28, 7–55.
Russell P, Fletcher W
(2003) Relative palatability of selected perennial plants in the southern rangelands of Western Australia – results of a survey of rangeland practitioners. Range Management Newsletter 03, 1–8.
Searle PL
(1984) The Berthelot or indophenol reaction and its use in the analytical chemistry of nitrogen. Analyst 109, 549–568.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Stuth J,
Jama A, Tolleson D
(2003) Direct and indirect means of predicting forage quality through near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Field Crops Research 84, 45–56.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams PC, Sobering DC
(1993) Comparison of commercial near infrared transmittance and reflectance instruments for analysis of whole grains and seeds. Near Infrared Spectroscopy 1, 25–32.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |