Grazing preferences by dairy cows for 14 forage species
A. Horadagoda A C , W. J. Fulkerson A , K. S. Nandra B and I. M. Barchia BA University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
B Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Menangle, NSW 2570, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: ajanthah@camden.usyd.edu.au
Animal Production Science 49(7) 586-594 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08299
Submitted: 29 December 2008 Accepted: 24 March 2009 Published: 11 June 2009
Abstract
The objective of this study was to quantify the grazing preference of dairy cows for eight grass, four legume and two herb species in eight seasons over 2 years. All species were grown at the same site, under the same climatic conditions, and with soil moisture and nutrient availability being non-limiting to plant growth.
The forage species evaluated were cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata cv. Kara H0265), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Bronsyn), short rotation ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum cv. Concord), fescue (Festuca arundinacea cv. Advance Maxp.), phalaris (Phalaris tuberose cv. Holdfast), paspalum (Paspalum dilatatum cv. Poir. Common), kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum cv. Whittet), prairie grass (Bromus willdenowii cv. Matua), lucerne (Medicago sativa cv. Sceptre), persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum cv. Maral), red clover (Trifolium pretense cv. Astred), white clover (Trifolium repens cv. Kopu II), chicory (Cichorium intybus cv. Grouse) and plantain (Plantago lanceolata cv. Tonic).
The 14 forage species treatment plots were laid out in a completely randomised block design with three replicate blocks. The treatment plots were around the circumference of a circle so that the three cows used in each test had unbiased access to all forage species within the blocks. The tests comprised observing the forage being grazed at 10-s intervals for 1 h. The cow preference was recorded as time (min) spent grazing on each forage species.
Three Holstein Friesian dairy cows of similar dominance were selected and had grazed all 14 forage species before tests. Cows were fed to requirements before each test so that they would be selective in choice of forages.
The most preferred species over the whole year was prairie grass followed by kikuyu and then white clover, despite the fact that kikuyu was not available in winter. Fescue was the least preferred grass species. The mean grazing times for prairie grass and kikuyu during the 1-h test periods of grazing was 11.6 and 10.5 min, respectively. White clover and lucerne were the most preferred legumes (9.6 and 9.0 min, respectively), whereas chicory and plantain were little consumed (3.5 and 3.2 min, respectively).
A prediction equation comprising water soluble carbohydrates (WSC%) and nitrate-nitrogen [NO3-N (g/kg DM)] over all seasons and forage species accounted for more variation in cow preference than any other single or combination of variables measured: cow preference [time (min) on plots] = 1.86 + 0.67 WSC% – 1.9 NO3-N (g/kg DM) (r2 = 0.76; s.e. = 2.22; n = 109). The results indicate that the relative palatability of forages can be reasonably well predicted from WSC% and NO3-N concentration, having a positive and negative effect on cow preference, respectively.
The prediction equation was improved for groups of species if neutral detergent fibre (NDF%) was included: grasses, cow preference [time (min) on plots] = 24.5 + 0.42 WSC% – 1.31 NO3-N (g/kg DM) – 0.39 NDF% (r2 = 0.87; s.e. = 1.62; n = 57); legumes, cow preference [time (min) on plots] = 3.02 + 0.98 WSC% – 2.15 NO3-N (g/kg DM) – 0.08 NDF% (r2 = 0.92; s.e. = 1.38; n = 36); and herbs, cow preference [time (min) on plots] = 19.41 + 0.22 WSC% – 1.74 NO3-N (g/kg DM) – 0.69 NDF% (r2 = 0.53; s.e. = 1.81; n = 19).
Additional keywords: cow preference, forages, palatability.
Acknowledgements
This project was partly funded by Dairy Australia and The University of Sydney. Authors appreciate the excellent technical assistance provided by S. G. Suarez Sandoval and Kim McKane for his skilled assistance at the May Farm, University of Sydney.
Aderibigbe AO,
Church DC,
Frakes RV, Petersen RG
(1982) Factors determining palatability of ryegrass to cattle. Journal of Animal Science 54, 164–172.
Baker SK,
Klein L, Purser DB
(1994) Physical characters of forages as constraints to voluntary intake. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 20, 57–59.
Barry TN
(1998) The feeding value of chicory (Cichorium intybus) for ruminant livestock. The Journal of Agricultural Science 131, 251–257.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baumont R,
Prache S,
Meuret M, Morand-fehr P
(2000) How forage characteristics influence behaviour and intake in small ruminants: a review. Livestock Production Science 64, 15–28.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beauchemin KA, Rode LM
(1997) Minimum versus optimum concentrations of fibre in dairy cow diets based on barley silage and concentrates of barley or corn. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1629–1639.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Cataldo DA,
Haroo M,
Schrader LE, Young VL
(1975) Rapid calorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 6, 71–80.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Clarke T,
Filma PC, McGowan AA
(1982) Low cost pepsin–cellulase assays for prediction of digestibility of herbage. Grass and Forage Science 37, 147–150.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Corbett JL,
Langlands JP, Reid GW
(1963) Effect of season on growth and digestibility of herbage on intake by grazing dairy cows. Animal Production 5, 119–129.
Cosgrove GP,
Waghorne GC, Parsons AJ
(1999) Exploring the nutritional basis of preference and diet selection by sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 61, 175–180.
Cowlishaw SJ, Alder FE
(1960) The grazing preferences of cattle and sheep. The Journal of Agricultural Science 54, 257–265.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dumont B
(1996) Diet preferences of herbivores at pasture. Productions Animales 9, 359–366.
Foster JG,
Fedders JM,
Clapham WM,
Robertson JW,
Bligh DP, Turner KE
(2002) Nutritive value and animal selection of forage chicory cultivars grown in central Appalachia. Journal of Agronomy 94, 1034–1042.
Francis SA,
Chapman DF,
Doyle PT, Leury BL
(2006) Dietary preference of cows offered choices between white clover and ‘high sugar’ and typical ryegrass cultivars. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1579–1587.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fulkerson WJ, Donaghy DJ
(2001) Plant-soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence-key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 261–275.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Fulkerson WJ,
Slack K,
Hennessy DW, Hough GM
(1998) Nutrients in ryegrass (Lolium spp.), white clover (Trifolium repens) and kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures in relation to season and stage of regrowth in subtropical environment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 227–240.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Garner FH
(1963) The palatability of herbage plants. Journal of British Grassland Society 18, 79–89.
Heady HF
(1964) Palatability of herbage and animal preference. Journal of Range Management 17, 76–82.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Inoue T,
Brookes IM, Barry TN
(1989) Effects of selection for shear strength on the voluntary intake and digestion of perennial ryegrass fed to sheep. New Zealand Society of Animal Production 49, 221–223.
Jones EL, Roberts JE
(1991) A note on the relationship between palatability and water-soluble carbohydrates concentration in perennial ryegrass. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 163–167.
|
CAS |
Marotti DM,
Cosgrove GP,
Chapman DF,
Parsons AJ,
Egan AR, Anderson CB
(2001) Novel methods of forage presentation to boost nutrition and performance of grazing dairy cows. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 56, 161.
Marten GC
(1978) The animal-plant complex in forage palatability phenomena. Journal of Animal Science 46, 1470–1477.
Mayland HF,
Shewmaker GE,
Harrison PA, Chatterton NJ
(2000) Nonstructural carbohydrates in tall fescue cultivars. Relationship to animal preference. Agronomy Journal 92, 1203–1206.
|
CAS |
Crossref |
Nombekela SW,
Murphy MR,
Gonyou HW, Marden JI
(1994) Dietary preferences in early lactation cows as affected by primary tastes and some common feed flavours. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2393–2399.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Provenza FD,
Villalba JJ,
Haskell J,
MacAdam JW,
Griggs TC, Wiedmeier RD
(2007) The value to herbivores of plant physical and chemical diversity in time and space. Crop Science 47, 382–398.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reeves M,
Fulkerson WJ, Kellaway RC
(1996) Forage quality of kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum): the effect of time of defoliation and nitrogen fertiliser application and in comparison with perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1349–1359.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reid RL,
Jung GA, Murray SJ
(1966) Nitrogen fertilization in relation to the palatability and nutritive value of orchard grass. Journal of Animal Science 25, 636–645.
Sanada Y,
Takai T, Yamada T
(2007) Inheritance of concentration of water-soluble carbohydrates and its relationship with the concentrations of fibre and crude protein in herbage of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). Grass and Forage Science 62, 322–331.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Sanderson MA,
Labreveux M,
Hall MH, Elwinger GF
(2003) Nutritive value of chicory and English plantain forage. Crop Science 43, 1797–1804.
|
CAS |
Smit HJ,
Tamminga S, Elgersma A
(2006) Dairy cattle grazing preference among six cultivars of perennial ryegrass. Agronomy Journal 98, 1213–1220.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith D
(1969) Removing and analysing total structural carbohydrates from plant tissue. Wisconsin Agriculture Experimental Station Research Report 41, 1–11.
Van Soest PJ,
Robertson JB, Lewis BA
(1991) Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
