Biodiversity benefits of alley farming with old man saltbush in central western New South Wales
Julian Seddon A C , Stuart Doyle A , Mark Bourne A , Richard Maccallum B and Sue Briggs AA Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW), c/- CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, GPO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B NSW Department of Primary Industries, Condobolin Agricultural Research and Advisory Station, PO Box 300, Condobolin, NSW 2877, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: julian.seddon@csiro.au
Animal Production Science 49(10) 860-868 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08280
Submitted: 17 November 2008 Accepted: 19 January 2009 Published: 16 September 2009
Abstract
Agricultural production systems that also provide opportunities to conserve biodiversity will be a crucial component of integrated and sustainable land use in mixed farming landscapes and should be considered and evaluated. Alley farming is an innovative farming system that aims to increase farm profitability while also enhancing environmental outcomes. Alley farming incorporates belts of woody perennial plants such as trees or shrubs, interspersed with alleys of conventionally rotated cropping and livestock grazing land. In the present study, we assessed the impacts on terrestrial biodiversity of alley farming with the native perennial chenopod shrub old man saltbush (Atriplex nummularia Lindl.) in central western New South Wales. Terrestrial biodiversity conservation status was assessed by site surveys conducted in spring 2005, 2006 and 2007 at 15 old man salt bush alley farming sites (OMSB), 15 conventionally managed sites and three native woodland remnants in and around the Condobolin Agricultural Research and Advisory Station in the central western plains of New South Wales. Biodiversity surveys included an assessment of ‘site condition’ – a metric of biodiversity conservation status at the site scale based on measurement of 10 habitat and vegetation condition attributes, compared against benchmark values for the appropriate native ecosystems with relatively little recent anthropogenic modification. Bird surveys were also conducted to assess the diversity and abundance of birds in OMSB, conventional and remnant woodland sites in four functional response groups. Site condition was significantly higher at remnant woodland sites than at conventional farming and OMSB alley farming sites. Remnant woodland sites had greater native overstorey cover and native ground cover of forbs, more trees with hollows, presence of at least some overstorey regeneration and the presence of fallen logs. Site condition was also significantly higher at OMSB sites than at conventional sites and increased significantly across 3 years. By the third year after establishment, OMSB sites had higher native plant species richness and native mid-storey cover than did conventionally farmed sites. These attributes increased markedly over time at the OMSB sites whereas they did not increase at conventional or remnant woodland sites. Native grasses and forbs established under and around the saltbush plants, indicating that OMSB alley plantings can provide habitat for a wide range of native plant species, enhancing biodiversity values of these areas through improved structure and composition. Improved habitat condition at the OMSB sites after 3 years did not lead to a significantly higher diversity or to a higher overall abundance of birds at the OMSB than at conventional sites. Furthermore, diversity and abundance of birds at both OMSB and conventional sites remained significantly below those of remnant woodland sites. Some decliner bird species were observed using OMSB sites, but not conventional sites. Old man saltbush alley farming can provide direct on-site benefits for native biodiversity by improving the structure, function and composition of vegetation at the site or paddock scale. If proposed as a replacement to conventional crop–pasture rotation, OMSB alley farming can enhance biodiversity conservation values, and where production benefits are likely, could play an important role in the integration of production and conservation as a synergistic ‘win–win’ system in mixed farming enterprises.
Additional keywords: biodiversity conservation, multiple catchment outcomes, sustainable production.
Acknowledgements
This project was possible due to the hard work of NSW Department of Primary Industries staff who established and ran the alley farming trial at the Condobolin Agricultural Research and Advisory Station. We are also grateful to CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems for providing office and computing support. This project was funded through the Central West/Lachlan Grain & Graze Regional Initiative and by the Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW). The conclusions of this study do not necessarily represent the official views or policies of the NSW Government.
Barrett-Lennard EG,
George RJ,
Hamilton G,
Norman HC, Masters DG
(2005) Multi-disciplinary approaches suggest profitable and sustainable farming systems for valley floors at rick of salinity. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1415–1424.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bathgate A,
Seddon J,
Finlayson J, Hacker R
(2009) Managing catchments for multiple objectives: the implications of land use change for salinity, biodiversity and economics. Animal Production Science 49, 852–859.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gibbons P, Boak M
(2002) The value of paddock trees for regional conservation in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Management & Restoration 3, 205–210.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gibbons P,
Briggs SV,
Ayers D,
Seddon J,
Doyle S,
Cosier P,
McElhinny C,
Pelly V, Roberts K
(2009) An operational method to assess impacts of land clearing on terrestrial biodiversity. Ecological Indicators 9, 26–40.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holloway JC,
Furlong MJ, Bowden PI
(2008) Management of beneficial invertebrates and their potential role in integrated pest management for Australian grain systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1531–1542.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knight A,
Blott K,
Portelli M, Hignett C
(2002) Use of tree and shrub belts to control leakage in three dryland cropping environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 571–586.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lefroy EC,
Flugge F,
Avery A, Hume I
(2005) Potential of current perennial plant-based farming systems to deliver salinity management outcomes and improve prospects for native biodiversity: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1357–1367.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McElhinny C,
Gibbons P,
Brack C, Bauhus J
(2006) Fauna–habitat relationships: a basis for identifying key stand structural attributes in temperate Australian eucalypt forests and woodlands. Pacific Conservation Biology 12, 89–110.
McIntyre S,
McIvor J, Macleod N
(2001) New grazing approach is vital for sustainability. Farming Ahead 120, 27–28.
McIntyre S,
McIvor J, Macleod N
(2002) Maintaining trees enhances grazing potential. Farming Ahead 121, 47–48.
Pressey RL,
Hagar TC,
Ryan KM,
Schwarz J,
Wall S,
Ferrier S, Creaser PM
(2000) Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions: quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation 96, 55–82.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pretty JN
(1997) The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Natural Resources Forum 21, 247–256.
Ridley AM
(2005) The role of farming systems group approaches in achieving sustainability in Australian agriculture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 603–615.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schellhorn NA,
Macfadyen S,
Bianchi FJJA,
Williams DG, Zalucki MP
(2008) Managing ecosystem services in broadacre landscapes: what are the appropriate spatial scales? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1549–1559.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seddon JA,
Briggs SV, Doyle SJ
(2003) Relationships between bird species and characteristics of woodland remnants in the central wheat/sheep belt of New South Wales. Pacific Conservation Biology 9, 95–119.
Tsitsilas A,
Stuckey S,
Hoffmann AA,
Weeks AR, Thomson LJ
(2006) Shelterbelts in agricultural landscapes suppress invertebrate pests. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1379–1388.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tullberg JN,
Yule DF, McGarry D
(2007) Controlled traffic farming – from research to adoption in Australia. Soil & Tillage Research 97, 272–281.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Unkovich M,
Blott K,
Knight A,
Mock I,
Rab A, Portelli M
(2003) Water use, competition, and crop production in low rainfall, alley farming systems of south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 751–762.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
