Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA08168
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 49(11)

Lessons learnt about effectively applying participatory action research: a case study from the New South Wales dairy industry

M. A. Friend A D , A. M. Dunn B and J. Jennings C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (Industry & Investment NSW and Charles Sturt University), Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.

B School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.

C School of Natural Sciences, University of Western Sydney – Hawkesbury, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: mfriend@csu.edu.au

Animal Production Science 49(11) 1007-1014 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08168
Submitted: 19 May 2008  Accepted: 26 June 2009   Published: 14 October 2009

Abstract

A participatory action research (PAR) project was implemented in the New South Wales dairy industry. Six regional dairy groups were given funding to investigate issues relating to management of the feedbase. Facilitated meetings in the regions identified limitations to local systems and how these limitations could be addressed. Local groups then implemented research of relevance to their systems. Activities varied but groups were guided by the principles of PAR. Regional groups consisted of farmers, government extension and/or research staff, processors and other stakeholders. A leadership team, consisting of representatives from each of the regional groups and other stakeholders, was formed to administer the project and assist groups in using the PAR approach. Evaluation of the project indicated high levels of participation in all regions and a strong sense of ownership of the project and/or project work. The most commonly mentioned outcome in the groups was what they learned as a result of involvement. The project and its evaluation are discussed in relation to PAR principles, the outcomes from the approach, and lessons learnt for improving the success of PAR.


Acknowledgements

Funding for PPP was provided by Dairy Australia through the NSW Dairy Industry Development Co. The participation of NSW dairy farmers and other industry stakeholders is gratefully acknowledged.


References


Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (1999) ‘Technology and farm management practices in the Australian dairy industry.’ (ABARE: Canberra)

Black AW (2000) Extension theory and practice: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 493–502.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Verified 23 September 2009]

Kemmis S, McTaggart R (1988) ‘The action research planner.’ (Deakin University: Waurn Ponds, Vic.)

Knowles MS (1990) ‘The adult learner: a neglected species.’ (Gulf Publishing Company: Houston, TX)

Leeuwis C, van den Ban A (2004) ‘Communication for rural innovation: rethinking agricultural extension.’ (Blackwell: London)

Malouf D (1994) ‘How to teach adults in a fun and exciting way.’ (Business and Professional Publishing: Chatswood, NSW)

McTaggart R (1991) Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly 41, 168–187.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McTaggart R (1997) Guiding principles for participatory action research. In ‘Participatory action research: international contexts and consequences’. (Ed. R McTaggart) pp. 25–44. (State University of New York Press: Albany)

Ridley AM, Paramore TR, Beverly CR, Dunin FX, Froelich VMC (2003) Developing environmental monitoring tools from sustainability indicators in the southern Riverina. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 271–284.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Roberts K (2001) Review of the learning process in the Profitable Pastures Project. Final report. Roberts Research and Evaluation, University of Western Sydney, Sydney.

Russell DB, Ison RL, Gamble DR, Williams RK (1989) ‘A critical review of rural extension theory and practice.’ (Faculty of Agriculture and Rural Development, University of Western Sydney – Hawkesbury: Richmond)

Savin-Baden M, Wimpenny K (2007) Exploring and implementing participatory action research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 31, 331–343.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stanfield D (1997) Training – if you grab them by their learning principles the rest will follow. In ‘Australasian Pacific Extension Conference: managing change, building knowledge and skills. Vol. 1’. pp. 391–400. (Conference Design: Sandy Bay, Tas.)

Trompf JP, Sale PWG (2001) Differences in management practices and attitudes between the Triple P Program entrants and other pastoral producers in the region. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 773–779.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tyson T (1998) ‘Working with groups.’ 2nd edn. (McMillan: South Melbourne)

Vanclay F (2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 213–222.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1