The relevance of captive breeding to conservation of native ratites in Argentina: an overview
J. L. Navarro A B and M. B. Martella AA Centro de Zoología Aplicada, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
B Corresponding author. Email: navarroj@efn.uncor.edu
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(10) 1302-1307 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08155
Submitted: 30 April 2008 Accepted: 2 July 2008 Published: 11 September 2008
Abstract
The two South American ratites (Lesser Rhea, Pterocnemia pennata and Greater Rhea, Rhea americana) are categorised as ‘Near Threatened’ in the Red List of Threatened Species of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, and are included in Appendices 1 and II of Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. The wild populations of rheas are affected by human activities, such as illegal hunting and egg harvesting, and conversion of natural habitats into croplands. On the other hand, commercial farming of rheas has been expanding in the last two decades. Studies on farms have led to improved production, not only for commercialisation, but also for the release of individuals to the wild. Effectiveness of this latter strategy was confirmed by fieldwork and radio-telemetry. Molecular studies revealed that genetic variability of captive populations of Greater Rhea were similar to those of wild ones, and they do not show signs of inbreeding depression or differences in allele frequencies. Consequently, as natural populations of rheas continue to decline, farms will arguably serve as genetic reservoirs and provide a source of individuals for repopulation. Therefore captive breeding should be regarded as having high value as a conservation tool for native ratites.
Additional keywords: management, population genetics, radio-tracking, reintroduction.
Acknowledgements
The Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) of Argentina, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica, Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, and Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología de Córdoba (formerly Agencia Córdoba Ciencia SE), supported successive works that the authors conducted on rheas. The Organising Committee of the 4th International Ratite Symposium and the 23rd World Poultry Congress supported JLN to present this paper in Brisbane (Australia). JLN and MBM are researchers of CONICET.
Amelotti I,
Martella MB, Navarro JL
(In press) ¿Difiere la probabilidad de eclosión de los huevos de ñandú (Rhea americana), según su ubicación dentro de la incubadora? Revista Argentina de Producción Animal ,
[Verified 29 July 2008]
Lábaque MC,
Navarro JL, Martella MB
(1999) A note on chick adoption: a complementary strategy for rearing rheas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 165–170.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lábaque MC,
Navarro JL, Martella MB
(2003) Microbial contamination of artificially incubated Greater Rhea eggs. British Poultry Science 44, 355–358.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Lábaque MC,
Navarro JL, Martella M
(2004b) Effects of storage time on hatchability of artificially incubated Greater Rhea (Rhea americana) eggs. British Poultry Science 45, 638–642.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Lábaque MC,
Martella MB, Navarro JL
(2007) Coefficients for the estimation of fresh weight and volume of Greater Rhea eggs. British Poultry Science 48, 308–311.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Martella MB,
Navarro JL,
Gonnet J, Monge S
(1996) Diet of Greater Rheas in an agroecosystem of central Argentina. The Journal of Wildlife Management 60, 586–592.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Navarro JL, Martella MB
(2002) Reproductivity and raising of Greater Rhea (Rhea americana) and Lesser Rhea (Pterocnemia pennata) – a review. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 66, 124–132.
Navarro JL, Martella MB
(2004) Conservación y manejo de ñandúes en Argentina. V Jornada Nacional de Ornitología del Perú. Dilloniana 3, 5–7.
Navarro JL,
Martella MB, Cabrera MB
(1998) Fertility of Greater Rhea orphan eggs: conservation and management implications. Journal of Field Ornithology 69, 117–120.
Navarro JL,
López ML,
Maestri DM, Labuckas DO
(2001) Physical characteristics and chemical composition of Greater Rhea (Rhea americana) eggs from wild and captive populations. British Poultry Science 42, 658–662.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Navarro JL,
Barri FR,
Maestri DM,
Labuckas DO, Martella MB
(2003) Physical characteristics and chemical composition of Lesser Rhea (Pterocnemia pennata) eggs from farmed populations. British Poultry Science 44, 586–590.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Rossi Fraire HJ, Martella MB
(2006) DNA test to sex the Lesser Rhea (Rhea pennata pennata). British Poultry Science 47, 375–377.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Sales J
(2006) The rhea, a ratite native to South America. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 17, 105–124.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sarasqueta DV
(1988) Observaciones sobre la biología del choique o Ñandú petiso (Pterocnemia pennata) de la Patagonia. Presencia 15, 17–22.
Seddon PJ,
Armstrong DP, Maloney RE
(2007) Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology 21, 303–312.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Storfer A
(1999) Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Biological Conservation 87, 173–180.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vignolo PE,
Martella MB,
Navarro JL,
Maceira NO, Demaría MR
(2001) Preferencia alimentaria y tasa de crecimiento en pichones de ñandú moro (Rhea americana). Revista Argentina de Producción Animal 21, 9–16.
