Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA07144
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 47(9)

A simple statistical model to estimate precision of 300-day milk and fat production for dairy cows

T. Clarke A B and M. C. Hannah A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, 1301 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: tim.clarke@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(9) 1095-1099 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07144
Submitted: 17 May 2007  Accepted: 25 May 2007   Published: 6 August 2007

Abstract

In this paper we use a statistical model to examine the relative precision of lactation milk yield and milk fat yield, under various production recording regimes with different metering and sampling precision, recording frequencies combined with empirical daily variations in milk yield and fat composition. The analysis shows that if traditional monthly production recording was performed with devices of International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR) precision, the resultant coefficient of variation (CV) for lactation yields of milk and fat would be 2.22 and 4.81%, respectively. These values are determined primarily by measurement frequency coupled with the natural daily biological variations in animal milk yield and fat composition. Meter and sampler precision play a relatively minor role. For example, our model shows that if the devices had double the CV prescribed by ICAR, the milk and fat yield CV would increase by only 0.20 and 0.19%, respectively. These are minute losses of precision. If the ICAR precision standards for meters and samples were relaxed, it could encourage development of innovative metering and sampling technologies that could provide much more cost-effective and convenient ways for farmers to conduct production recording.


Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the National Herd Improvement Association of Australia and the Dairy Herd Improvement Fund of Victoria for their support. We also thank Graeme Mein for his advice and encouragement.


References


Clarke T, McGowan AA (1984) Accuracy of alternative methods of estimating weekly yields of milk fat and protein. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 24, 464–468.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Clarke T, Andrew S-P, Moate PJ, Pollino CA, Schmidt WL (1997) Evaluation of low cost in-line milk samplers for estimating individual cow somatic cell counts. The Journal of Dairy Research 64, 13–22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Dairy Research and Development Corporation (1993) ‘International benchmarking in the Australian dairy industry.’ (Dairy Research and Development Corporation: Melbourne)

ICAR (2007) ICAR recording guidelines. International agreement of recording practices. ICAR guidelines approved by the general assembly held in Kuopio, Finland on 9 June 2006. p. 332–333. Available at http://www.icar.org/Documents/Rules%20and%20regulations/Guidelines/Guidelines_2007.pdf [Verified 14 June 2007]

Koorn DS (1998) The introduction of a milk recording system based on milk yields of ICAR approved electronic milk meters and AT4 sampling for fat, protein and SCC. In ‘Performance recording of animals: state of the art, 1998. Proceedings of the 31st biennial session of ICAR, Rotorua, New Zealand. January 18–23, 1998’. EAAP Publication No. 91. (Ed. C Linton) pp. 147–150. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen)

Mein GA, Hannah MC, Clarke T (2001) Limits of error for permanently-installed milk meters used for herd recording or for daily herd management purposes. In ‘Proceedings of ICAR, 32nd biennial session, Bled, Slovenia, 2000’. EAAP publication No. 98. (Eds M Klopcic, N Siard, S Zgur) pp. 159–162. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen)

Short C, Gleeson T, Abdalla A, Tiepu A (1997) Herd recording’s economic contribution to the Victorian dairy industry. ABARE project 1282, Canberra, Australia.

Wilcox CJ, Krienke WA (1964) Variation and interrelationship of composition and yield of daily milk samples. Journal of Dairy Science 47, 638–641. open url image1

Wilmink J, Galesloot P, Johnson D, Outweltjes W, Rosati L, Schaeffer L, Steine T, Vanraden P (1998) Final report of the ICAR-INTERBULL working group on milk recording accuracy and its impact on genetic evaluations. In ‘Performance recording of animals: state of the art, 1998. Proceedings of the 31st biennial session of ICAR, Rotorua, New Zealand. January 18–23, 1998’. EAAP Publication No. 91. (Ed. C Linton) pp. 249–257. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen)