Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of strategies for increasing irrigation water productivity of maize in southern New South Wales using the MaizeMan model

E. Humphreys A B E , R. J. G. White C , D. J. Smith A and D. C. Godwin D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Land and Water, PMB3 Griffith, NSW 2680, Australia.

B Present address: Challenge Program on Water and Food, International Rice Research Institute, DAPO 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines.

C 2 Gunn Drive, Estella, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

D Altin Park, Dubbo, NSW 2830, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: e.humphreys@cgiar.org

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(3) 304-312 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06092
Submitted: 14 March 2006  Accepted: 7 February 2007   Published: 4 February 2008

Abstract

MaizeMan is Windows-based decision support software, derived from CERES Maize and SWAGMAN Destiny, which can be used for real-time irrigation scheduling or strategic analysis. Evaluation of MaizeMan for sprinkler and furrow-irrigated maize (Pioneer 3153) showed good predictive ability for yield, biomass, runoff and soil water depletion between sowing and harvest. MaizeMan simulations using 43 years of weather data from Griffith, New South Wales, suggested that the biggest influence on yield, irrigation requirement and irrigation water productivity is seasonal weather conditions. For example, yield of October-sown 3153 irrigated frequently to avoid soil water deficit varied from about 8 to 16 t/ha, while net irrigation and net irrigation water productivity varied from 7 to 11 ML/ha and 0.8 to 1.6 t/ML, respectively. The optimum sowing window for maximising yield and irrigation water productivity is wide, from late September to mid November. Delaying sowing beyond this may result in higher yield and irrigation water productivity; however, delayed maturity would lead to problems for grain drying and harvesting in winter and increased insect pressure. The simplest management strategy for maximising yield and irrigation water productivity is irrigation scheduling tailored to soil type. Irrigation scheduling can be assisted by real-time scheduling using MaizeMan, provided soil hydraulic properties are accurately characterised. One to two irrigations can also be saved by growing shorter duration hybrids, but the tradeoff is lower yield, while irrigation water productivity is maintained. Simulated sprinkler irrigation increased yield and net irrigation water productivity by small amounts (averages of 0.5 t/ha and 0.2 t/ML, respectively) relative to well-scheduled flood irrigation, through improved soil water and aeration status and reduced deep drainage loss.


Acknowledgements

The development of MaizeMan was initiated by Professor Wayne Meyer of CSIRO Land and Water and supported with funds from GRDC. We thank Brad Fawcett (CSIRO Land and Water) for excellent technical support. We are grateful for input from members of the project steering committee, workshop participants and farmers for access to crops, especially Nick Hutchins, Nick Maynard, Sam Mancini, Paul Lander and Tim and Roger Commins. We also thank Professor Meyer and Drs Jagadish Timsina and Warren Muirhead for their feedback on drafts of this paper.


References


Duffield S (2000) The ecology and pest status of Helicoverpa armigera (heliothis) in the Riverina. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th Australian maize conference’. (Eds D McCaffery, A Vince) pp. 82–87. (The Maize Association of Australia: Darlington Point, NSW)

Edraki M, Smith D, Humphreys E, Khan S, O’Connell N, Xevi E (2003) Validation of the SWAGMAN Farm and SWAGMAN Destiny models. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report 44/03. Available at http://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/technical2003/tr44-03.pdf [Verified 10 December 2007]

Greenwood KL, Mundy GN, Kelly KB (2008) On-farm measurement of the water use productivity of maize. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 274–284. [Verified 10 December 2007]

Kiniry JR, Williams JR, Vanderlip RL, Atwood JD, Reicosky DC, Mulliken J, Cox WJ, Mascagni J, Hollinger SE, Wiebold WJ (1997) Evaluation of two maize models for nine U.S. locations. Agronomy Journal 89, 421–426. [Verified 10 December 2007]

Meyer WS, Smith DJ, Shell G (1999) Estimating reference evaporation and crop evapotranspiration from weather data and crop coefficients. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report 34/98. Available at http://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/technical98/index.html [Verified 10 December 2007]

O’Neill CJ, Humphreys E, Louis J, Katupitiya A (2008) Maize productivity in Southern New South Wales under furrow and pressurised irrigation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 285–295. open url image1

Ritchie JT (1972) Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resources Research 8(5), 1204–1213. open url image1

Sidhu HS, Manpreet-Singh , Humphreys E, Yadvinder-Singh , Balwinder-Singh , Dhillon SS, Blackwell J, Bector V, Malkeet-Singh , Sarbjeet-Singh (2007) The Happy Seeder enables direct drilling of wheat into rice stubble. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 844–854.
Crossref |
open url image1

Smith DJ, Meyer WS, Barrs HD (1993) Effects of soil type on maize crop daily water use and capillary upflow in weighing lysimeters during 1989–90. CSIRO Division of Water Resources Technical Memorandum 93/20. CSIRO Land and Water, Griffith.