Selection response in fecal worm egg counts in the Rylington Merino parasite resistant flock
L. J. E. Karlsson A B and J. C. Greeff AA Department of Agriculture and Food WA, 10 Dore Street, Katanning, WA 6317, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: jkarlsson@agric.wa.gov.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(7) 809-811 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05367
Submitted: 22 December 2005 Accepted: 21 May 2006 Published: 8 June 2006
Abstract
The Rylington Merino internal parasite resistant selection line was initiated in 1987 from a wide genetic base of 100 ewe flocks. Selection for parasite resistance was based on selecting animals with a low worm egg count in a natural parasite challenge environment. The realised annual genetic gain for estimated breeding value of worm egg count is 2.7%. The genetic gain in parasite resistance has been achieved without any adverse genetic correlations with the other economically important production traits. There is an unfavourable genetic correlation between worm egg count and scouring traits. The recommendation to industry is to select for both low worm egg count and reduced diarrhoea and combine these traits with other economically important production traits. The relative weighting applied to each component trait will vary according to the local parasite challenge situation and the time frame available to achieve sustainable parasite control.
Acknowledgments
This long-term selection line has had various funding support including; wool producer research funding through Australian Wool Corporation and the Department of Agriculture WA. The initial ewe and ram contributions by sheep farmers and research organisations are acknowledged. Richard Coole and other farmers associated with Rylington Merino have provided assistance to the running of this project. Departmental staffs at research stations and laboratories have helped. Numerous scientific colleagues have collaborated.
Albers GAA,
Gray GD,
Piper LR,
Barker JSF,
Le Jambre LF, Barger IA
(1987) The genetics of resistance and resilience to Haemonchus contortus infection in young Merino sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 17, 1355–1363.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Edwards JR,
Wroth R,
De Chaneet GC,
Besier RB,
Karlsson J,
Morcombe PW,
Dalton–Morgan G, Roberts D
(1986) Survey of anthelmintic resistance in Western Australian sheep flocks. 1. Prevalence. Australian Veterinary Journal 63, 135–138.
| PubMed |
Karlsson LJE, Greeff JC
(1996) Preliminary genetic parameters of fecal worm egg count and scouring traits in Merino sheep selected for low worm egg count in a Mediterranean environment. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 21, 477.
Karlsson LJE,
Pollott GE,
Eady SJ, Greeff JC
(2004) Relationship between fecal worm egg count and scouring in Australian Merino sheep. Proceeding of the Australian Society of Animal Production 25, 100–103.
Pollott GE,
Karlsson LJE,
Eady SJ, Greeff JC
(2004) Genetic parameters for indicators of host resistance to parasites from weaning to hogget age in Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2852–2864.
| PubMed |
Windon RG, Dineen JK
(1981) The effect of selecting both sire and dam on the response of F1 generation lambs to vaccination with irradiated Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae. International Journal for Parasitology 11, 11–18.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Woolaston RR, Piper LP
(1996) Selection of Merino sheep for resistance to Haemonchus contortus: genetic variation Animal Science 62, 451–460.
van Wyk J
(2001) Refugia – overlooked as perhaps the most potent factor concerning the development of anthelmintic resistance. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 68, 55–67.
| PubMed |