Application of composted pig bedding litter on a Vertosol and Sodosol soil. 1. Effect on crop growth and soil water
R. D. Armstrong A , C. Eagle A B , V. Matassa A and S. D. Jarwal A CA Department of Primary Industries, PB 260 Horsham, Vic. 3401, Australia.
B Present address: Conservation Volunteers Australia, 130 Franklin Street, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
C Present address: Department of Primary Industries, PB 4166, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: roger.armstrong@dpi.vic.gov.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(6) 689-699 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05156
Submitted: 1 June 2005 Accepted: 13 October 2006 Published: 17 May 2007
Abstract
Trials were undertaken at two sites with contrasting soil types in the Wimmera region of Victoria: a well-structured grey cracking clay soil (Vertosol) at Traynors Lagoon and a poorly structured sodic clay soil (Sodosol) at Gre Gre. The effect of a once-off application of three different types of bedding litter (wheat straw and two types of rice hulls) applied at three rates (20, 30 and 40 t/ha) was compared with that of a control (no amelioration), nitrogen fertiliser (46 kg N/ha) applied to each crop, or nitrogen plus a once-off application of gypsum (2.5 t/ha). The growth of three subsequent crops and soil water was examined.
Pig bedding litter (rice hulls 1, rice hulls 2 or wheat straw) produced marked improvements in the dry matter production and grain yield of the first crop (wheat) in 1997 and a following canola crop in 1998. In 1999, bedding litter significantly improved the growth of an oats crop at Gre Gre, but had no effect on a crop of field peas at Traynors Lagoon. The beneficial effects of bedding litter on grain yields, however, were matched by small but significant reductions in grain quality resulting from soil water limitations for the yield potential. Although crop growth was improved by the addition of nitrogen fertiliser each year or both nitrogen plus gypsum, the effect was usually small compared with that of adding litter and provided minimal residual value in the following year. There was a general trend for gravimetric soil water to be higher at sowing where bedding litter had been applied, especially at Gre Gre. In contrast, soil water tended to be lower at grain maturity at Traynors Lagoon, where bedding litter or nitrogen fertiliser had been applied, reflecting the enhanced crop growth in these treatments compared with the control. There was no consistent effect of treatments on soil water at maturity in either 1998 or 1999 at Gre Gre.
Additional keywords: organic matter, sodicity, water use.
Acknowledgements
This project was jointly funded by the Department of Primary Industries (Victoria), the Pig Research and Development Corporation and John O’Shae (Bunge Pty Ltd). We would like to express our thanks to Greg Baldwin and family (Gre Gre) and Graeme Meade (Traynors Lagoon) for use of their properties to undertake trials.
Angus JF, Fischer RA
(1991) Grain and protein responses to nitrogen applied to wheat growing on a red earth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 735–746.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Armstrong RD,
McCosker K,
Millar G,
Kuskopf B,
Johnson S,
Walsh K,
Probert ME, Standley J
(1999) Legume and opportunity cropping systems in Central Queensland. 2. Effect of legumes on following crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 925–936.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Armstrong RD,
Eagle C, Jarwal SD
(2007) Application of composted bedding straw on alkaline soils in southern Australia. 2. Effect on soil chemical and physical fertility. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture in press ,
Avalakki UK,
Strong WM, Saffigna PG
(1995) Measurement of gaseous emissions from denitrification of applied nitrogen-15. III. Field measurements. Australian Journal of Soil Research 33, 101–111.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Black AS,
Sherlock RR, Smith NP
(1987) Effect of timing of simulated rainfall on ammonia volatilisation from urea, applied to soil of varying moisture content. Journal of Soil Science 38, 679–687.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brechin J, McDonald GK
(1994) Effect of form and rate of pig manure on the growth, nutrient uptake, and yield of barley (cv. Galleon). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 505–510.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carey PL,
Rate AW, Cameron KC
(1997) Fate of nitrogen in pig slurry applied to a New Zealand pasture soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 941–959.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Churchman GJ,
Skemstad JO, Oades JM
(1993) Influence of clay minerals and organic matter on effects of sodicity on soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 31, 779–800.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Herwaarden AF,
Angus JF,
Farquhar GD,
Howe GN, Richards RA
(1998) ‘Haying off’, the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertiliser. I. Biomass, grain yield and water-use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1067–1081.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hocking PJ, Mason L
(1993) Accumulation, distribution and redistribution of dry matter and mineral nutrients in fruits of canola (oilseed rape), and the effects of nitrogen fertiliser and windrowing. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 1377–1388.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hocking PJ,
Kirkegaard JA,
Angus JF,
Gibson AH, Koetz EA
(1997) Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments. I. Effects of nitrogen fertiliser on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality. Field Crops Research 49, 107–125.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holford ICR,
Doyle AD, Leckie CC
(1992) Nitrogen response characteristics of wheat protein in relation to yield responses and their interaction with phosphorus. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 969–986.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kliese YJ,
Dalal RC,
Strong WM, Menzies NJ
(2005) Piggery pond sludge as a nitrogen source for crops. 2. Assay of wet and dried piggery pond sludge by successive cereal crops or direct measurement of soil available N. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 245–255.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ladd JN, Amato M
(1986) The fate of nitrogen from legume and fertiliser sources in soils successively cropped with winter wheat under field conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 18, 417–425.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lauer DA,
Bouldin DR, Kauser SD
(1976) Ammonium volatilisation from liquid swine manure spread on the soil surface. Journal of Environmental Quality 5, 134–141.
McDonald GK
(1992) Effect of nitrogenous fertiliser on the growth, grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 949–967.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nuttall JG,
Armstrong RD, Connor DJ
(2003) Evaluating physico-chemical constraints of calcarosols on wheat yield in the Victorian southern Mallee. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 487–498.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
O’Leary GJ, Connor DJ
(1997a) Stubble retention and tillage in a semi-arid environment. 1. Soil water accumulation during fallow. Field Crops Research 52, 209–219.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Phillips IR
(2004) Using PEAK and CHEMFLO to predict leaching of piggery wastewater in large undisturbed soil cores. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 35, 2005–2022.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strong WM,
Dalal RC,
Weston EJ,
Cooper JE,
Lehane KJ,
King AJ, Chicken CJ
(1996) Sustaining the productivity of a vertisol at Warra, Queensland, with fertilisers, no tillage or legumes. 2. Long-term fertiliser nitrogen needs to enhance wheat yields and grain protein. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36, 665–674.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tuohey CL, Robson AD
(1980) The effect of cropping after medic and non-medic pastures on total soil nitrogen, and on the grain yield and nitrogen content of wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 20, 220–228.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |