Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA04182
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 46(10)

Managing yield reductions from wide row spacing in wheat

M. Amjad A D and W. K. Anderson B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Western Australian Department of Agriculture, PMB 50, Esperance, WA 6450, Australia.

B Western Australian Department of Agriculture, 444 Albany Highway, Albany, WA 6450, Australia.

C School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009 Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: mamjad@agric.wa.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(10) 1313-1321 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04182
Submitted: 25 August 2004  Accepted: 10 March 2006   Published: 13 September 2006

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to investigate row spacing effects on wheat yield and grain quality and the interactions between row spacing and cultivars, plant population density, nitrogen application rate, time of sowing, fertiliser placement and row spread from 2000 to 2002 in the south coast region of Western Australia. In the experiments that were conducted following pasture or lupins, wider row spacings of 240 and 360 mm consistently reduced wheat yield and increased grain protein and small grain screenings compared with a narrow row spacing of 180 mm. Average plant numbers were reduced in the wider rows in all experiments. This result, possibly related to increased competition for water as the seeds were placed closer together in the wide rows, may also have been related to reductions in wheat grain yield. The yield decline in wider rows was lowest for the long season cultivar Camm with a May sowing in 1 experiment and at the higher N rate in another experiment. The response of Camm at wider row spacings can be partially explained by its higher dry matter production as measured in 2000 and may also help to explain the observed advantage of Camm in suppressing weed growth at all row spacings. In 2002, the row spread (seed width within the row) was varied from normal 25 mm widths to 50 and 75 mm widths. Yield was increased at the widest row spacing (360 mm) by using the wider row spreads of 50 or 75 mm. Fertiliser placement methods significantly affected plant establishment but not grain yield. Grain quality (protein percentage, small grain screenings and hectolitre weight) was reduced in wider rows in some cases or unaffected in others. This research has demonstrated that yield reductions due to wide row spacing can be minimised by using a long season cultivar when sown in May, by using adequate N fertiliser and by increasing the spread of seed across the row.

Additional keyword: sowing rates.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank Veronika Reck for technical help with data collection, Mario D’Antuono for help with experimental design and statistical analyses, and staff of the Esperance Downs Research Station for trial management. The research was undertaken as a joint venture between the Department of Agriculture and the South East Premium Wheat-growers Association (SEPWA). The project is funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation and the Department of Agriculture. The authors also thank all the collaborating farmers and the project advisory team for their assistance in planning and execution of this research.


References


Amjad M, Riethmuller GP, Jarvis RJ (1998) Wheat yield responds to the previous year’s lupin seeding rate. In ‘Highlights of cereal research and development in Western Australia’. (Eds W Anderson, J Blake) pp. 52–53. (Western Australia Department of Agriculture: Perth)

Anderson WK (1986) Some relationships between plant population, yield components and grain yield of wheat in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 219–233.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Anderson WK, Crosbie GB, Lambe WJ (1997) Production practices in Western Australia for wheats suitable for white, salted noodles. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 49–58.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Anon.  (2001) Harvest Handbook 2000/01. Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited, Perth, Western Australia.

Belford RK, Riethmuller GP (1992) Narrow row spacing has little effect on yield of wheat in the eastern wheatbelt. Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Technical Report No. 51, Perth.

Burch RN (1986) Effects of changing row spacing on wheat yields. Final report: Wheat Industry Research Council Project No. 498/0051 and Western Australian State Wheat Research Committee Project No. 355/0067, Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Perth

Carter OG (1967) The effect of chemical fertilizers on seedling establishment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 7, 174–180.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Del Cima R, D’Antuono MF, Anderson WK (2004) The effects of soil type and seasonal rainfall on the optimum sowing rate for wheat in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 585–594.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

French RJ, Schultz JE (1984) Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. 1. The relationship between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 743–764.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Genstat (2003) ‘GenStat® statistical package for Windows.’ (Lawes Agricultural Trust: Hemel Hempsted, UK)

Jarvis RJ (1992) Lupin row spacing. Western Australian Department of Agriculture Technote No 161, Perth.

Leonard L (1993) Managing for stubble retention. Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Bulletin No. 4271, Perth.

Mason MG (1971) Effects of urea, ammonium nitrate and superphosphate on establishment of cereals, linseed and rape. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 11, 662–669.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Riethmuller GP, Amjad M (1996) Machinery for no-tillage sowing into wheat and lupin stubble. Western Australian Department of Agriculture. Farmnote No. 70/96, Perth .

Shackley BJ (2000) Crop management. In ‘The wheat book — principles and practice’. (Eds WK Anderson, JR Garlinge) pp. 140–145. (Western Australia Department of Agriculture: Perth)

Stoneman TC, Overheu TD, Muller PG (1990) An introduction to the soils of the Esperance Advisory District — descriptions, illustrations and notes on seven common soils. Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Bulletin No. 4230, Perth.

Tennant D (2000) Crop water use. In ‘The wheat book — principles and practice’. (Eds WK Anderson, JR Garlinge) pp. 55–67. (Western Australia Department of Agriculture: Perth)

Yunusa IAM, Belford RK, Tennant D, Sedgley RH (1993) Row spacing fails to modify soil evaporation and grain yield in spring wheat in a dry Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 661–676.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1