Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Lucerne improves some sustainability indicators but may decrease profitability of cropping rotations on the Jimbour Plain

R. B. Murray-Prior A C , J. Whish B , P. Carberry B and N. Dalgleish B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Muresk Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Northam, WA 6401, Australia.

B APSRU/CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: R.Murray-Prior@curtin.edu.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(6) 651-663 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA03164
Submitted: 8 August 2003  Accepted: 3 June 2004   Published: 29 June 2005

Abstract

Long-run rotational gross margins were calculated with yields derived from biophysical simulations in a crop simulation model over a period of 100 years and prices simulated in @Risk based on subjective triangular price distributions elicited from the Jimbour Plain farmer group. Rotations included chickpeas, cotton, lucerne, sorghum, wheat and different lengths of fallow. The aim was to assess the profitability of rotations with and without lucerne. Output presented to the farmers included mean annual gross margins and distributions of gross margins with box and whisker plots found to be suitable. Mean–standard deviation and first- and second-degree stochastic dominance efficiency measures were also calculated. The paper outlines a method for combining biophysical and price simulations that can be understood by farmers. Including lucerne in the rotations improved some sustainability indicators but reduced profitability.

Additional keywords: APSIM, modelling rotations.


Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the contributions of the farmer members of the Jimbour Plain’s group (Glen, Jamie and Rob), Professor David Trechter for comments on this paper, and the assistance of Perry Poulton in developing and adapting Visual Basic macros. Thanks also to 2 anonymous referees for their helpful comments. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 2003 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Conference, Fremantle, WA. Financial assistance from GRDC through the Eastern Farming Systems Project is acknowledged.


References


Abadi Ghadim AK , Pannell DJ (2003) Risk attitudes and risk perceptions of crop producers in Western Australia. In ‘Risk management and the environment: agriculture in perspective’. (Eds BA Babcock, RW Fraser, JN Lekakis) pp. 113–133. (Kluwer: Dordrecht)

Anderson JR, Dillon JL, Hardaker JB (1977) ‘Agricultural decision analysis.’ (Iowa State University Press: Ames)

Bardsley P, Harris M (1991) Rejoinder: an approach to the econometric estimation of attitudes to risk in agriculture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 35, 319. (verified 27 April 2004).

Ghosh D, Ray MR (1997) Risk, ambiguity, and decision choice: some additional evidence. Decision Sciences 28, 81–104. open url image1

Hardaker JB, Huirne RBM, Anderson JR (1997) ‘Coping with risk in agriculture.’ (CAB International: New York)

Keating BA, McCown RL (2000) Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention. Agricultural Systems 70, 555–579.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, Probert ME, Robertson MJ , et al . (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agromony 18, 267–288.
Crossref |
open url image1

Kingwell R (1993) Effects of tactical responses and risk aversion on farm wheat supply. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Agricultural Economics Association conference’. (Australian Agricultural Economics Association: Sydney)

Kunreuther H, Meszaros J, Hogarth RM, Spranca M (1995) Ambiguity and underwriter decision processes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 26, 337–352.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Meinke H, Baethgen WE, Carberry PS, Donatelli M, Hammer GL, Selvaraju R, Stockle CO (2001) Increasing profits and reducing risks in crop production using participatory systems simulation approaches. Agricultural Systems 70, 493–513.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mukerji S (1998) Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of contractual form. The American Economic Review 88, 1207–1231. open url image1

Munro RG, Fisher BS (1982). The formulation of price expectations: an empirical study of woolgrowers in New South Wales. Report No. 8, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Sydney, Sydney.

Murray-Prior R (1996) Strategy and the role of decision aids. In ‘Proceedings of the 22nd national conference of the Australian Farm Management Society. Workshop papers’. pp. 19–22. (Australian Farm Management Society: Adelaide)

Murray-Prior R, Wright V (2001) Influence of strategies and heuristics on farmers’ response to change under uncertainty. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 45, 573–598.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Palisade (1997) ‘Guide to using @Risk: windows version.’ (Palisade Corporation: Newfield NY)

Pannell DJ (1995) Economic aspects of legume management and legume research in dryland farming systems of southern Australia. Agricultural Systems 49, 217–236.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pannell DJ (2001) Explaining non-adoption of practices to prevent dryland salinity in Western Australia: implications for policy. In ‘Land degradation’. (Ed. A Conacher) pp. 335–346. (Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht)

Sarin RK, Weber M (1993) Effects of ambiguity in market experiments. Management Science 39, 602–615. open url image1

Weston EJ, Dalal RC, Strong WM, Lehane J (1997) The benefit of a partial lay in cereal cropping. In ‘Pastures under adverse conditions: proceedings of the 12th annual conference of the Grasslands Society of NSW’. (Eds A Bowman, D Michalk) pp. 11–17. (Grasslands Society of NSW Conference: Dubbo, NSW)