Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > AN24309
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)
Contents Vol 64(16)

Modelling the impact of increasing supplementary feed allowance on predicted sheep enterprise production, profit and financial risk across southern Australia

A. L. Bates https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4984-3581 A * , S. M. Robertson https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-2216 B C , S. R. McGrath https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-4267 B C , M. B. Allworth B C and G. Refshauge D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Qld 4701, Australia.

B School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.

C Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.

D New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Rural Development, Cowra, NSW 2794, Australia.

* Correspondence to: a.bates@cqu.edu.au

Handling Editor: Wayne Bryden

Animal Production Science 64, AN24309 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN24309
Submitted: 18 September 2024  Accepted: 9 October 2024  Published: 24 October 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context

Supplementary feeding may alter sheep enterprise production and profit margin, but use may vary across regions, sheep breeds and mating seasons. Supplementary feeding is a means of ensuring adequate nutrition but increases operating costs. Modelling has previously indicated the most profitable sheep enterprises optimise stocking rate and target lamb production, whereas those that minimise supplementary feeding incur the least financial risk.

Aims

To explore the impact of increasing supplementary feed allowance on production, profit and financial risk.

Methods

Seventy-two sheep farm enterprises were simulated across eight southern Australian locations, including three breeds and three mating seasons. For each enterprise a low grain allowance (LGA) of 30 kg/head.year (threshold used in previous modelling) was compared to a high grain allowance (HGA) of 35 kg/head.year and 42 kg/head.year for Merino and non-Merino ewes (current industry recommendations), respectively. The financial risk of each enterprise was determined via Conditional Value at Risk of gross margins over 30 years, exploring downside risk in the worst 20% of scenarios.

Key results

A HGA increased production and profit in 32% of farm enterprises, but financial risk was often increased. Merino enterprises were generally the most profitable, least risky and consumed the greatest amount of supplementary feed, followed by Composite and then Maternal enterprises. Summer and autumn mating was often most profitable, but high supplement consumption in autumn-mated enterprises increased financial risk.

Conclusions

Increasing supplementary feeding may improve production and profit but may also increase financial risk using the parameters examined.

Implications

Producers may be able to improve the production, profit and financial risk of an enterprise through increased supplementary feeding, but this will be dependent on breed, input costs, commodity prices and location.

Keywords: AusFarm, composite, grain, management, maternal, Merino, reproduction, sheep production, supplementation, time of mating.

References

Amidy MR, Behrendt K, Badgery WB (2017) Assessing the profitability of native pasture grazing systems: a stochastic whole-farm modelling approach. Animal Production Science 57(9), 1859-1868.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bates AL, McGrath SR, Robertson SM, Refshauge G (2022) Mating conditions and management practices influence pregnancy scanning outcomes differently between ewe breeds. Animals 12(21), 2908.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Bates AL, McGrath SR, Allworth MB, Robertson SM, Refshauge G (2023) A cross-sectional study of commercial ewe management practices for different sheep breeds across southern Australia. Animals 13(3), 388.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Blumer S, Behrendt R, Hocking Edwards J, Young J, Thompson A (2019) Lifetime maternals - Phase II: feeding standards for maternal ewes (Project code: L.LSM.0008) [Report]. Meat and Livestock Australia Limited. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/reports/2019/feeding-standards-for-modern-maternal-ewes/

Bureau of Meteorology (2022) Average annual, seasonal and monthly rainfall Vol. 2022. Commonwealth of Australia. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/climate_averages/rainfall/index.jsp

Byrne F, Robertson MJ, Bathgate A, Hoque Z (2010) Factors influencing potential scale of adoption of a perennial pasture in a mixed crop-livestock farming system. Agricultural Systems 103(7), 453-462.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Casburn G (2010) The profitability of a lamb meat system is greatly influenced by lambing time. Australian Farm Business Management Journal 7(2), 37-43.
| Google Scholar |

DEDJTR (2018) Drought feeding and management of sheep - a guide for farmers and land managers 2018. Victorian Government, Department of Economic Development, Transport and Resources, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

EverGraze (2012) Hamilton proof site: Key messages Vol. 2024. (EverGraze) Available at https://www.evergraze.com.au/research-and-demonstration/hamilton-proof-site/index.html

Fogarty NM, Mulholland JG (2014) Seasonal reproductive performance of crossbred ewes in intensive lamb-production systems. Animal Production Science 54(6), 791-801.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (2012) The GRAZPLAN animal biology model for sheep and cattle and the GrazFeed decision support tool [Reviewed 2012]. Available at https://grazplan.csiro.au/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/TechPaperMay12.pdf

Kingwell R (2002) Sheep animal welfare in a low rainfall Mediterranean environment: a profitable investment? Agricultural Systems 74(2), 221-240.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kleemann DO, Walker SK (2005) Fertility in South Australian commercial Merino flocks: sources of reproductive wastage. Theriogenology 63(8), 2075-2088.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kopke E, Young J, Kingwell R (2008) The relative profitability and environmental impacts of different sheep systems in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Systems 96(1–3), 85-94.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Making More From Sheep (2008) Making More From Sheep. Available at https://www.makingmorefromsheep.com.au/

Masters DG, Ferguson MB (2019) A review of the physiological changes associated with genetic improvement in clean fleece production. Small Ruminant Research 170, 62-73.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Meat and Livestock Australia Limited (2022a) Australia - Sheepskin prices - Lambs - Calendar year. Available at http://statistics.mla.com.au/Report/List

Meat and Livestock Australia Limited (2022b) Australia - Sheepskin prices - Merino sheep - Calendar year. Available at http://statistics.mla.com.au/Report/List

Moore AD (2009) Opportunities and trade-offs in dual-purpose cereals across the southern Australian mixed-farming zone: a modelling study. Animal Production Science 49(10), 759-768.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moore AD (2014) The case for and against perennial forages in the Australian sheep–wheat zone: modelling livestock production, business risk and environmental interactions. Animal Production Science 54(12), 2029-2041.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moore AD, Holzworth DP, Herrmann NI, Huth NI, Robertson MJ (2007) The common modelling protocol: a hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems. Agricultural Systems 95(1–3), 37-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

NSW DPI (2021) Livestock gross margin budgets Vol. 2021. Available at https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/budgets/livestock

Robertson SM, Friend MA (2020) Performance of sheep systems grazing perennial pastures. 4. Simulated seasonal variation and long-term production. Animal Production Science 60(3), 423-435.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Robertson SM, Southwell AF, Friend MA (2014) Modelling the risk of different joining times and lamb sale policies. Animal Production Science 54(10), 1694-1698.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking and Finance 26(7), 1443-1471.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Salmon L, Donnelly JR, Moore AD, Freer M, Simpson RJ (2004) Evaluation of options for production of large lean lambs in south–eastern Australia. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112(1), 195-209.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Stone G, Pozza RD, Carter J, McKeon G (2019) Long Paddock: climate risk and grazing information for Australian rangelands and grazing communities. The Rangeland Journal 41(3), 225-232.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thomas DT, Moore AD, Bell LW, Webb NP (2018) Ground cover, erosion risk and production implications of targeted management practices in Australian mixed farming systems: lessons from the Grain and Graze program. Agricultural Systems 162, 123-135.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Walkom SF, Brown DJ (2017) Genetic evaluation of adult ewe bodyweight and condition: relationship with lamb growth, reproduction, carcass and wool production. Animal Production Science 57(1), 20-32.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Warn L, Webb Ware J, Salmon L, Donnelly J, Alcock D (2006) Analysis of the profitability of sheep wool and meat enterprises in southern Australia (Project 1.2.6) [Report: Australian Sheep Industry CRC]. Sheep CRC, Armidale, Australia. Available at https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.472.8604&rep=rep1&type=pdf

White DH, Bowman PJ, Morley FHW, McManus WR, Filan SJ (1983) A simulation model of a breeding ewe flock. Agricultural Systems 10(3), 149-189.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Young JM, Thompson AN, Curnow M, Oldham CM (2011) Whole-farm profit and the optimum maternal liveweight profile of Merino ewe flocks lambing in winter and spring are influenced by the effects of ewe nutrition on the progeny’s survival and lifetime wool production. Animal Production Science 51(9), 821-833.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Young M, Vercoe PE, Kingwell RS (2022) Optimal sheep stocking rates for broad-acre farm businesses in Western Australia: a review. Animal Production Science 62(9), 803-817.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |