Selection for growth rate at pasture in Angus cattle results in heavier cattle that eat more in the feedlot

R. M. Herd; V. H. Oddy; P. F. Arthur; M. B. McDonagh

doi:10.1071/AN24084

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Next Contents Vol 64(9)

Selection for growth rate at pasture in Angus cattle results in heavier cattle that eat more in the feedlot

R. M. Herd

^A ^B ^* , V. H. Oddy ^A ^B , P. F. Arthur ^C and M. B. McDonagh ^D

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Livestock Industry Centre, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

^B Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

^C NSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia.

^D Australian Wagyu Association, Suite 6, 146 Marsh Street, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

^* Correspondence to: robert.herd@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Handling Editor: Forbes Brien

Animal Production Science 64, AN24084 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN24084

Submitted: 8 March 2024 Accepted: 31 May 2024 Published: 18 June 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context

Selection for growth rate has received considerable attention in beef cattle but the evidence for an improvement in the efficiency of feed conversion is equivocal.

Aim

To examine whether feed efficiency by beef cattle finished in a feedlot had been changed in response to divergence selection for growth rate.

Methods

The Angus cattle used came from three lines of cattle selected for over five generations for fast growth rate to yearling age (High-line), slow growth (Low-line), or from an unselected Control-line. Over sequential years, a cohort of steers, then of heifers and then of steers, representative of the lines, were measured for feedlot performance, and carcase- and meat-quality traits. The animals were fed a high-energy feedlot ration and after an adjustment period they underwent a performance test of at least 70 days of duration. After slaughter, muscle samples were taken for subsequent measurement of the components of the endogenous calpain proteolytic enzyme system. Their carcasses underwent a standard chiller assessment and meat samples were taken after 1 day and 14 days (steers) or 17 days (heifers) for objective measurement of tenderness.

Key results

Cattle from the High-line grew 48% faster (P < 0.05), and ate 48% more feed (P < 0.05) than did those from the Low-line, but had similar (P > 0.05) feed conversion ratio and residual feed intake. There were no differences between the High-line and Low-line in the visual meat-quality attributes of meat colour, fat colour and marbling, and no differences in the objective measurements of tenderness and connective-tissue toughness. There was no evidence of a selection response in the circulating concentrations of the metabolites and hormones measured, nor in the endogenous calpain proteolytic enzyme system in muscle.

Conclusions

The superior growth demonstrated by the High-line cattle over the feedlot test was accompanied by a higher feed intake, with no evidence for an improvement in feed efficiency.

Implications

Selection for growth rate is a powerful tool to alter animal performance but the beef industry needs to be cognisant of the proportional increase in feed requirement from breeding bigger animals.

Keywords: ADG, calpain, calpastatin, FCR, meat quality, RFI, tenderness, weight.

References

Arthur PF, Parnell PF, Richardson EC (1997) Correlated responses in calf body weight and size to divergent selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle. Livestock Production Science 49, 305-312.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Barlow R (1984) Selection for growth and size in ruminants: is it time for a moratorium? In ‘Proceedings of the second world congress sheep and cattle breeding’, 16–19 April 1984, Pretoria, South Africa. Vol. 1. (Eds JH Hofmeyr, EHH Meyer) pp. 1–12. (South African Stud Book and Livestock Improvement Association)

Bhat ZF, Morton JD, Mason SL, Bekhit AE-DA (2018) Role of calpain system in meat tenderness: a review. Food Science and Human Wellness 7, 196-204.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bindon BM (2001) Genesis of the cooperative research centre for the cattle and beef industry: integration of resources for beef quality research (1993–2000). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 843-853.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bouton PE, Ford AL, Harris PV, Ratcliff D (1975) Objective–subjective assessment of meat tenderness. Journal of Texture Studies 6, 315-328.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cantalapiedra-Hijar G, Abo-Ismail M, Carstens GE, Guan LL, Hegarty R, Kenny DA, McGee M, Plastow G, Relling A, Ortigues-Marty I (2018) Review: biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle. Animal 12, s321-s335.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Ferns AN, Herd RM, Woodgate RT, Quinn C, Zirkler K, Oddy VH (1996) Can IGF1 be used as an indirect selection criterion for beef cattle? In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production’, Vol. 21, p. 403. Available at http://www.livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8658

Freer M, Dove H, Nolan JV (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic, Australia)

Goll DE, Thompson VF, Taylor RG, Ouali A (1998) The calpain system and skeletal muscle growth. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78, 503-512.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Herd RM (1992) IGF1 – a poor indicator of growth rate in different-sized Angus cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics 10, 404-407.
| Google Scholar |

Herd RM (1995) Effect of divergent selection for yearling growth rate on the maintenance feed requirements of mature Angus cows. Livestock Production Science 41, 39-49.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Herd RM, Oddy VH (2023) Selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle results in bigger cows that eat more. Animal Production Science 63, 1272-1287.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Herd RM, Speck PA, Wynn PC (1991) Feed requirements for maintenance and growth of one-year-old Angus steers selected for either fast or slow yearling growth rate. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 591-595.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Herd RM, Velazco JI, Smith H, Arthur PF, Hine B, Oddy H, Dobos RC, Hegarty RS (2019) Genetic variation in residual feed intake is associated with body composition, behavior, rumen, heat production, hematology, and immune competence traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 97, 2202-2219.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Jeyaruban MG, Johnston DJ, Graser H-U (2009) Genetic association of net feed intake measured at two stages with insulin-like growth factor-I, growth and ultrasound scanned traits in Angus cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18, 584-587.
| Google Scholar |

Kaur L, Hui SX, Morton JD, Kaur R, Chian FM, Boland M (2021) Endogenous proteolytic systems and meat tenderness: influence of post-mortem storage and processing. Food Science of Animal Resources 41, 589-607.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kenny DA, Fitzsimons C, Waters SM, McGee M (2018) Invited review: improving feed efficiency of beef cattle – the current state of the art and future challenges. Animal 12, 1815-1826.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Koch RM, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Van Vleck LD (2004) Genetic response to selection for weaning weight or yearling weight or yearling weight and muscle score in Hereford cattle: efficiency of gain, growth, and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 82, 668-682.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Koohmaraie M (1990) Quantification of Ca²⁺-dependent protease activities by hydrophobic and ion-exchange chromatography. Journal of Animal Science 68, 659-665.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kretchmar DH, Hathaway MR, Epley RJ, Dayton WR (1990) Alterations in postmortem degradation of myofibrillar proteins in muscle of lambs fed a beta-adrenergic agonist. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1760-1772.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Li CB, Li J, Zhou GH, Lametsch R, Ertbjerg P, Brüggemann DA, Huang HG, Karlsson AH, Hviid M, Lundström K (2012) Electrical stimulation affects metabolic enzyme phosphorylation, protease activation, and meat tenderization in beef. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1638-1649.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lobley GE (1998) Nutritional and hormonal control of muscle and peripheral tissue metabolism in farm species. Livestock Production Science 56, 91-114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lobley GE (2003) Protein turnover – what does it mean for animal production? Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83, 327-340.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McDonagh MB, Fernandez C, Oddy VH (1999) Hind-limb protein metabolism and calpain system activity influence post-mortem change in meat quality in lamb. Meat Science 52, 9-18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

McDonagh MB, Herd RM, Richardson EC, Oddy VH, Archer JA, Arthur PF (2001) Meat quality and the calpain system of feedlot steers following a single generation of divergent selection for residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 1013-1021.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moore KL, Johnston DJ, Graser H-U, Herd R (2005) Genetic and phenotypic relationships between insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and net feed intake, fat, and growth traits in Angus beef cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 211-218.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Morris CA, Baker RL, Hunter JC (1992) Correlated responses to selection for yearling or18-month weight in Angus and Hereford cattle. Livestock Production Science 30, 33-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Oddy VH (1999) Protein metabolism and nutrition in farm animals: an overview. In ‘Protein metabolism and nutrition’. (Eds GE Lobley, A White, JC MacRae) pp. 9–23. (European Association for Animal Production: Wageningen, Netherlands)

Oddy VH, Herd RM, McDonagh MB, Woodgate R, Quinn CA, Zirkler K (1998) Effect of divergent selection for yearling growth rate on protein metabolism in hind-limb muscle and whole body of Angus cattle. Livestock Production Science 56, 225-231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Oddy VH, Harper GS, Greenwood PL, McDonagh MB (2001) Nutritional and developmental effects on the intrinsic properties of muscles as they relate to the eating quality of beef. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 921-942.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Parnell PF, Herd RM, Perry D, Bootle B (1994) The Trangie experiment – Responses in growth rate, size, maternal ability, reproductive performance, carcase composition, feed requirements and herd profitabilty. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production’, Perth, WA, Australia, Vol. 20, pp. 17–20. Available at http://www.livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8566

Parnell PF, Arthur PF, Barlow R (1997) Direct response to divergent selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle. Livestock Production Science 49, 297-304.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Perry D, Arthur PF (2000) Correlated responses in body composition and fat partitioning to divergent selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle. Livestock Production Science 62, 143-153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Richardson EC, Herd RM (2004) Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 431-440.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Richardson EC, Herd RM, Archer JA, Arthur PF (2004) Metabolic differences in Angus steers divergently selected for residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 441-452.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

SAS (2022) ‘SAS STAT software, Version 9.4 of SAS OnDemand for Academics.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA)

Speck PA, Herd RM, Ward W, Newman R, Brennan C, Patterson T, Wynn PC (1990) Selection for yearling weight in cattle – the role of metabolic hormones. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production’, Vol. 18, p. 551.

Upton W, Burrow HM, Dundon A, Robinson DL, Farrell EB (2001) CRC breeding program design, measurements and database: methods that underpin CRC research results. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 943-952.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |