Milk yield and feeding behaviour responses to two flat-rate levels of concentrate supplementation fed over a period of 8 months to cohorts of grazing dairy cows, differing in genotype, bodyweight, or milk yield
Pieter J. M. Raedts
A * and James L. Hills A
A
Abstract
In most pasture-based herds in Australia, supplementation with concentrates is normally a flat rate, with quantities determined by average cow requirements, rather than individual-cow requirements. Comparisons between flat rate and individual feeding rarely show advantages such as milk yield benefits for either. However, in pasture-based systems little is understood regarding milk production responses or levels of pasture substitution, when different groups of cows within the herd are fed concentrates at higher supplementation levels.
To investigate the effect on milk yield, feeding time, and ruminating time, of two flat-rate supplementation levels of concentrate, fed over 8 months to 180 cows selected for one of three different parameters.
Cohorts of cows were selected on contrasting differences for either milk production at the start of lactation, bodyweight, or genotype. Each cohort was divided into two balanced groups receiving either 2 or 6 kg DM/cow.day of concentrate, from approximately 12 days in milk onward. All cows remained part of the main milking herd (total herd size 320 spring-calving cows), with a similar opportunity for all cows to graze pasture or feed on supplemented grass silage during periods of pasture shortage. Milk yield was recorded at each milking and feeding behaviour continuously recorded by MooMonitor+ collars. Results were analysed for three seasonal periods of 10, 12 and 10 weeks (P1, P2 and P3 respectively) commencing in spring.
Mean marginal milk response (L milk per 1 kg DM extra of concentrate) over the trial period was 0.88 L, increasing from 0.71 L in P1, to 0.92 L in P2 and 1.03 L in P3. The high-concentrate cohorts recorded reduced feeding time per day of 37 min overall (46, 35 and 29 min for P1, P2 and P3 respectively). Significant differences were found for milk yield and feeding time between several contrasting cohorts. The lowest marginal milk response was for cross-breed cows in P1 with 0.18 L and feeding reduced by 65 min/cow.day, with the contrasting cohort of Friesian cows at a larger marginal response of 0.94 L and smaller feeding time reduction of 32 min/cow.day.
The differences among cohorts demonstrated potential for targeted concentrate feeding to specific groups of cows that respond differently in marginal milk yield and grazing behaviour.
When a significant change is made in strategic amounts of concentrate feeding, the impact not only on marginal milk response should be considered, but also on pasture intake.
Keywords: feeding time, flat-rate concentrate, lactating dairy cows, milk yield, pasture based, pasture substitution, resting time, rumination time.
References
Arriaga-Jordan CM, Holmes W (1986) The effect of concentrate supplementation on high-yielding dairy cows under two systems of grazing. The Journal of Agricultural Science 107, 453-461.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Auldist MJ, Marett LC, Greenwood JS, Hannah M, Jacobs JL, Wales WJ (2013) Effects of different strategies for feeding supplements on milk production responses in cows grazing a restricted pasture allowance. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 1218-1231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Auldist MJ, Marett LC, Greenwood JS, Wright MM, Hannah M, Jacobs JL, Wales WJ (2014) Replacing wheat with canola meal in a partial mixed ration increases the milk production of cows grazing at a restricted pasture allowance in spring. Animal Production Science 54, 869-878.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bargo F, Muller LD, Delahoy JE, Cassidy TW (2002) Milk response to concentrate supplementation of high producing dairy cows grazing at two pasture allowances. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1777-1792.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bargo F, Muller LD, Kolver ES, Delahoy JE (2003) Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1-42.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bines JA (1985) Feeding systems and food intake by housed dairy cows. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44, 355-362.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cabezas-Garcia EH, Gordon AW, Mulligan FJ, Ferris CP (2021) Revisiting the relationships between fat-to-protein ratio in milk and energy balance in dairy cows of different parities, and at different stages of lactation. Animals 11, 3256.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Dillon P, Hennessy T, Shalloo L, Thorne F, Horan B (2008) Future outlook for the Irish dairy industry: a study of international competitiveness, influence of international trade reform and requirement for change. International Journal of Dairy Technology 61, 16-29.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dixon RM, Stockdale CR (1999) Associative effects between forages and grains: consequences for feed utilisation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 757-773.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Enevoldsen C, Kristensen T (1997) Estimation of body weight from body size measurements and body condition scores in dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1988-1995.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gill MS, Kaushal JR (2000) Feeding of grass silage to dairy cows with special reference to systems of concentrate feeding in United Kingdom – a review. Agricultural Reviews–Agricultural Research Communications Centre India 21(2), 71-79.
| Google Scholar |
Hills JL, Wales WJ, Dunshea FR, Garcia SC, Roche JR (2015) Invited review: an evaluation of the likely effects of individualized feeding of concentrate supplements to pasture-based dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 1363-1401.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kibon A, Holmes W (1987) The effect of height of pasture and concentrate composition on dairy cows grazed on continuously stocked pastures. The Journal of Agricultural Science 109, 293-301.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mertens DR (1997) Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1463-1481.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Orr RJ, Rutter SM, Penning PD, Rook AJ (2001) Matching grass supply to grazing patterns for dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 56, 352-361.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Roche JR, Friggens NC, Kay JK, Fisher MW, Stafford KJ, Berry DP (2009) Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5769-5801.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Roche JR, Kay JK, Rius AG, Grala TM, Sheahan AJ, White HM, Phyn CVC (2013) Short communication: immediate and deferred milk production responses to concentrate supplements in cows grazing fresh pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 2544-2550.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Soca P, González H, Manterola H, Bruni M, Mattiauda D, Chilibroste P, Gregorini P (2014) Effect of restricting time at pasture and concentrate supplementation on herbage intake, grazing behaviour and performance of lactating dairy cows. Livestock Science 170, 35-42.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stockdale CR (1999) The nutritive characteristics of herbage consumed by grazing dairy cows affect milk yield responses obtained from concentrate supplementation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 379-387.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stockdale CR (2000) Differences in body condition and body size affect the responses of grazing dairy cows to high-energy supplements in early lactation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 903-911.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thompson NA, Holmes CW (1995) Supplementary feeding for increased milk production. Proceedings of the Massey Dairy Farmers Conference 47, 20-27.
| Google Scholar |
Tyrrell HF, Reid JT (1965) Prediction of the energy value of cow’s milk. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 1215-1223.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wales WJ, Kolver ES (2017) Challenges of feeding dairy cows in Australia and New Zealand. Animal Production Science 57(7), 1366-1383.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
