Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Approximating prediction error variances and accuracies of estimated breeding values from a SNP–BLUP model for genotyped individuals

L. Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3601-9729 A * , P. M. Gurman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4375-115X A , A. A. Swan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8048-3169 A and B. Tier A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (a joint venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries and the University of New England), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia

* Correspondence to: lli4@une.edu.au

Handling Editor: Sue Hatcher

Animal Production Science 63(11) 1086-1094 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN23027
Submitted: 16 January 2023  Accepted: 24 April 2023   Published: 18 May 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context: The accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBVs) is an important metric in genetic evaluation systems in Australia. With reduced costs for DNA genotyping due to advances in molecular technology, more and more animals have been genotyped for EBVs. The rapid increase in genotyped animals has grown beyond the capacity of the current genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method.

Aims: This study aimed to implement and evaluate a new single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–BLUP model for the computation of prediction error variances (PEVs) to accommodate the increasing number of genotyped animals in beef and sheep single-step genetic evaluations in Australia.

Methods: First, the equivalence of PEV estimates obtained from both GBLUP and SNP-BLUP models was demonstrated. Second, the computing resources required by each model were compared. Third, within the SNP-BLUP model, the PEVs obtained from subsets of SNP were evaluated against those from the complete dataset. Fourth, the new model was tested in the Australian Merino sheep and Angus beef cattle datasets.

Key results: The PEVs of genotyped animals calculated from the SNP–BLUP model were equivalent to the PEVs derived from the GBLUP model. The SNP–BLUP model used much less time than did the GBLUP model when the number of genotyped animals was larger than the number of SNPs. Within the SNP–BLUP model, the running time could be further reduced using a subset of SNPs makers, with high correlations (>0.97) observed between the PEVs obtained from the complete dataset and subsets. However, it is important to exercise caution when selecting the size of the subsets in the SNP–BLUP model, as reducing the subset size may result in an increase in the bias of the PEVs.

Conclusions: The new SNP-BLUP model for PEV calculation for genotyped animals outperforms the current GBLUP model. A new accuracy program has been developed for the Australian genetic evaluation system which uses much less memory and time to compute accuracies.

Implications: The new model has been implemented in routine sheep and beef genetic evaluation systems in Australia. This development ensures that the calculation of accuracies is sustainable, with increasing numbers of animals with genotypes.

Keywords: coefficient matrix, effective progeny numbers, GBLUP model, mixed model equations, PEV, reliability, single nucleotide polymorphism, single-step genetic evaluations.


References

Ben Zaabza H, Mäntysaari EA, Strandén I (2020) Using Monte Carlo method to include polygenic effects in calculation of SNP-BLUP model reliability. Journal of Dairy Science 103, 5170–5182.
Using Monte Carlo method to include polygenic effects in calculation of SNP-BLUP model reliability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ben Zaabza H, Van Tassell CP, Vandenplas J, VanRaden P, Liu Z, Eding H, McKay S, Haugaard K, Lidauer MH, Mäntysaari EA, Strandén I (2022) Invited review: reliability computation from the animal model era to the single-step genomic model era. Journal of Dairy Science 106, 1518–1532.
Invited review: reliability computation from the animal model era to the single-step genomic model era.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bermann M, Lourenco D, Misztal I (2021) Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the algorithm for proven and young. Journal of Animal Science 100, skab353
Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the algorithm for proven and young.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown DJ, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Graser H-U, Woolaston RR, Ball AJ, Atkins KD, Banks RB (2007) Genetic evaluation for the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 187–194.

Brown DJ, Swan AA, Boerner V, Li L, Gurman PM, McMillan AJ, van der Werf JHJ, Chandler HR, Tier B, Banks RG (2018) Single-step genetic evaluations in the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 11, 460

Edel C, Pimentel ECG, Erbe M, Emmerling R, Götz K-U (2019) Short communication: calculating analytical reliabilities for single-step predictions. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 3259–3265.
Short communication: calculating analytical reliabilities for single-step predictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ferdosi MH, Connors NK, Tier B (2019) An efficient method to calculate genomic prediction accuracy for new individuals. Frontiers in Genetics 10, 596
An efficient method to calculate genomic prediction accuracy for new individuals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garcia A, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Lourenco D (2022) Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP. Genetics Selection Evolution 54, 66
Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Graser HU, Tier B (1997) Applying the concept of number of effective progeny to approximate accuracies of predictions derived from multiple trait analyses. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 12, 547–551.

Henderson CR (1984) ‘Applications of linear models in animal breeding.’ (University of Guelph: Guelph, Canada)

Johnston DJ, Ferdosi MH, Connors NK, Boerner V, Cook J, Girard CJ, Swan AA, Tier B (2018) Implementation of single-step genomic BREEDPLAN evaluations in Australian beef cattle. Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 11, 269

Li L, Swan AA, Tier B (2017) Approximating the accuracy of single step EBVs. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 22, 89–92.

Liu Z, VanRaden PM, Lidauer M, Calus MPL, Benhajali H, Jorjani H, Ducrocq V (2017) Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation. Interbull Bulletin 51, 75–85.

Meuwissen TH, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of identity by descent probabilities from marker-haplotypes. Genetics Selection Evolution 33, 605–634
Prediction of identity by descent probabilities from marker-haplotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sargolzaei M, Schaeffer LR, Chesnais JP, Kistemaker G, Wiggans GR, Schenkel FS (2014) Approximation of reliability of direct genomic breeding values. Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 10, 485

Strandén I, Garrick DJ (2009) Technical note: derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2971–2975.
Technical note: derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4414–4423.
Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, Madden PA, Heath AC, Martin NG, Montgomery GW, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2010) Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature Genetics 42, 565–569.
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |